Science is facts as we know them today. Science was used to prop up the institution of slavery in America and the Third Reich in Germany. It is hardly the pure pursuit that you want it to be.
Science is never settled because the more facts we learn the more we throw out of what we thought we knew before.
I know in your little bubble anyone who disagrees with you is anti science but that's not the case.
Sorry
There's room for skepticism, but skepticism isn't a position. Skepticism is part of the scientific method, and how scientists approach the pursuit of truth.
There's a difference between scientific application to humans and race and the application to physical, elementary, molecular truths in our world.
Science is facts as we know them today. Science was used to prop up the institution of slavery in America and the Third Reich in Germany. It is hardly the pure pursuit that you want it to be.
Science is never settled because the more facts we learn the more we throw out of what we thought we knew before.
I know in your little bubble anyone who disagrees with you is anti science but that's not the case.
Sorry
There's room for skepticism, but skepticism isn't a position. Skepticism is part of the scientific method, and how scientists approach the pursuit of truth.
There's a difference between scientific application to humans and race and the application to physical, elementary, molecular truths in our world.
Science is facts as we know them today. Science was used to prop up the institution of slavery in America and the Third Reich in Germany. It is hardly the pure pursuit that you want it to be.
Science is never settled because the more facts we learn the more we throw out of what we thought we knew before.
I know in your little bubble anyone who disagrees with you is anti science but that's not the case.
Sorry
There's room for skepticism, but skepticism isn't a position. Skepticism is part of the scientific method, and how scientists approach the pursuit of truth.
There's a difference between scientific application to humans and race and the application to physical, elementary, molecular truths in our world.
The latest survey, taken in November 2013, finds that the majority of Americans — 63 percent — do believe in climate change, and 53 percent are "somewhat" or "very" worried about the consequences.
Considering the one-sided non-stop mantra from our "educators" for the past 20+ years, I'm shocked at how low those numbers are. BTW, they used to be much higher.
The accessibility of far right websites like Breitbart, redstate.com, etc has a lot to do with it.
Your envy of Ivy League intellectuals (Yale) is showing.
The latest survey, taken in November 2013, finds that the majority of Americans — 63 percent — do believe in climate change, and 53 percent are "somewhat" or "very" worried about the consequences.
Considering the one-sided non-stop mantra from our "educators" for the past 20+ years, I'm shocked at how low those numbers are. BTW, they used to be much higher.
The accessibility of far right websites like Breitbart, redstate.com, etc has a lot to do with it.
Your envy of Ivy League intellectuals (Yale) is showing.
The latest survey, taken in November 2013, finds that the majority of Americans — 63 percent — do believe in climate change, and 53 percent are "somewhat" or "very" worried about the consequences.
Considering the one-sided non-stop mantra from our "educators" for the past 20+ years, I'm shocked at how low those numbers are. BTW, they used to be much higher.
The accessibility of far right websites like Breitbart, redstate.com, etc has a lot to do with it.
Your envy of Ivy League intellectuals (Yale) is showing.
The latest survey, taken in November 2013, finds that the majority of Americans — 63 percent — do believe in climate change, and 53 percent are "somewhat" or "very" worried about the consequences.
Considering the one-sided non-stop mantra from our "educators" for the past 20+ years, I'm shocked at how low those numbers are. BTW, they used to be much higher.
The accessibility of far right websites like Breitbart, redstate.com, etc has a lot to do with it.
Your envy of Ivy League intellectuals (Yale) is showing.
It's the dead of Winter when half-brains go dormant more frequently and in vaster numbers of the northern American populace. Climatic science logically tells us that even with global warming, Winter is still Winter and always will be. It will always be difficult and likely impossible for the under-educated, science hating average American to grasp the thermodynamic laws which allow Mother Nature to dump more snow on New England, the Great Plains, and Rocky Mountains because the oceans are warmer with slightly higher water level and less salt concentration (brackishness).
Of course, the deeper snow will melt faster causing more floods inundating America's rivers and deltas with the coming of Spring and it's companion killer tornadoes. By the time the hurricane season arrives heralding another hot Summer accompanied by draught to plague red and blue states alike, the belief in global warming amongst the scientifically ignorant of the land and town alike will be back in vogue like a travelling evangelical born-again Christian tent show. While the masses of the stupid and more confused swing back and forth on the theology of God's will in accounting for the devil's weather, the science of it all will continue steady while wallowing sinfully in the Babylonian perverseness of Nature's truth.
Winter's 60% disbelief in global warming will with season's change be morphed into Summer's 60% fear that the planet is burning up and will soon be tossed into the sun like an overheated campfire marshmallow. Rejecting science as evil and thus too difficult to comprehend is always sad. However, we must keep The People stupid and ignorant or they might come to understand that it's not about saving jobs at the risk of fouling the earth's atmosphere and the air we breath, but about corporations continuing to fill their offshore accounts with the profits of pollution.
The science of global warming is unsound not because it's theories are unproven by actual weather conditions or patterns, but because it lacks the empirically derived data basis required for proof. The earth's atmosphere is simply too massive to run through a test lab, but therein lies the real scientific problem. Atmospheric scientists simply don't know at what point of pollutant concentration our atmosphere will be beyond the point of recovery. If the concentration gets too high, the volume of fouled air in the earth's atmosphere will be too large to ever be able to clean simply by shutting down the polluters and we likely won't know it until after that point of no return was reached. Then we will be truly fucked like in one of those post-apocalyptic science fiction movies. The answer might then be to find another planet unless engineers can come up with a scrubber big enough. Migrating to a new earth would really freak out the bible thumpers and science haters,...... who should get left behind so that they and their corporate polluter buddies can't fuck up another planet's atmosphere.
It's the dead of Winter when half-brains go dormant more frequently and in vaster numbers of the northern American populace. Climatic science logically tells us that even with global warming, Winter is still Winter and always will be. It will always be difficult and likely impossible for the under-educated, science hating average American to grasp the thermodynamic laws which allow Mother Nature to dump more snow on New England, the Great Plains, and Rocky Mountains because the oceans are warmer with slightly higher water level and less salt concentration (brackishness).
Of course, the deeper snow will melt faster causing more floods inundating America's rivers and deltas with the coming of Spring and it's companion killer tornadoes. By the time the hurricane season arrives heralding another hot Summer accompanied by draught to plague red and blue states alike, the belief in global warming amongst the scientifically ignorant of the land and town alike will be back in vogue like a travelling evangelical born-again Christian tent show. While the masses of the stupid and more confused swing back and forth on the theology of God's will in accounting for the devil's weather, the science of it all will continue steady while wallowing sinfully in the Babylonian perverseness of Nature's truth.
Winter's 60% disbelief in global warming will with season's change be morphed into Summer's 60% fear that the planet is burning up and will soon be tossed into the sun like an overheated campfire marshmallow. Rejecting science as evil and thus too difficult to comprehend is always sad. However, we must keep The People stupid and ignorant or they might come to understand that it's not about saving jobs at the risk of fouling the earth's atmosphere and the air we breath, but about corporations continuing to fill their offshore accounts with the profits of pollution.
The science of global warming is unsound not because it's theories are unproven by actual weather conditions or patterns, but because it lacks the empirically derived data basis required for proof. The earth's atmosphere is simply too massive to run through a test lab, but therein lies the real scientific problem. Atmospheric scientists simply don't know at what point of pollutant concentration our atmosphere will be beyond the point of recovery. If the concentration gets too high, the volume of fouled air in the earth's atmosphere will be too large to ever be able to clean simply by shutting down the polluters and we likely won't know it until after that point of no return was reached. Then we will be truly fucked like in one of those post-apocalyptic science fiction movies. The answer might then be to find another planet unless engineers can come up with a scrubber big enough. Migrating to a new earth would really freak out the bible thumpers and science haters,...... who should get left behind so that they and their corporate polluter buddies can't fuck up another planet's atmosphere.
Except for the fact that it isn't getting warmer and the ice caps aren't melting, your argument has merit.
The latest survey, taken in November 2013, finds that the majority of Americans — 63 percent — do believe in climate change, and 53 percent are "somewhat" or "very" worried about the consequences.
Considering the one-sided non-stop mantra from our "educators" for the past 20+ years, I'm shocked at how low those numbers are. BTW, they used to be much higher.
The accessibility of far right websites like Breitbart, redstate.com, etc has a lot to do with it.
Your envy of Ivy League intellectuals (Yale) is showing.
Comments
There's a difference between scientific application to humans and race and the application to physical, elementary, molecular truths in our world.
Great meaningless load of shit as always
Of course, the deeper snow will melt faster causing more floods inundating America's rivers and deltas with the coming of Spring and it's companion killer tornadoes. By the time the hurricane season arrives heralding another hot Summer accompanied by draught to plague red and blue states alike, the belief in global warming amongst the scientifically ignorant of the land and town alike will be back in vogue like a travelling evangelical born-again Christian tent show. While the masses of the stupid and more confused swing back and forth on the theology of God's will in accounting for the devil's weather, the science of it all will continue steady while wallowing sinfully in the Babylonian perverseness of Nature's truth.
Winter's 60% disbelief in global warming will with season's change be morphed into Summer's 60% fear that the planet is burning up and will soon be tossed into the sun like an overheated campfire marshmallow. Rejecting science as evil and thus too difficult to comprehend is always sad. However, we must keep The People stupid and ignorant or they might come to understand that it's not about saving jobs at the risk of fouling the earth's atmosphere and the air we breath, but about corporations continuing to fill their offshore accounts with the profits of pollution.
The science of global warming is unsound not because it's theories are unproven by actual weather conditions or patterns, but because it lacks the empirically derived data basis required for proof. The earth's atmosphere is simply too massive to run through a test lab, but therein lies the real scientific problem. Atmospheric scientists simply don't know at what point of pollutant concentration our atmosphere will be beyond the point of recovery. If the concentration gets too high, the volume of fouled air in the earth's atmosphere will be too large to ever be able to clean simply by shutting down the polluters and we likely won't know it until after that point of no return was reached. Then we will be truly fucked like in one of those post-apocalyptic science fiction movies. The answer might then be to find another planet unless engineers can come up with a scrubber big enough. Migrating to a new earth would really freak out the bible thumpers and science haters,...... who should get left behind so that they and their corporate polluter buddies can't fuck up another planet's atmosphere.
Worst CA drought in 153 yrs...nothing to see here folks.... I've been told the climate is always changing so there's nothing to be alarmed about!
#SafetySchools
"Only god can cover the poles with ice."
Keep the laughs coming.