The scariest thing...

RedRocket

Houhusky said:

RedRocket said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Swaye said:

...isn't Biden beating Trump, it's that the Dems look likely to win the Senate as well. Can you imagine what is about to happen with unified socialist government? Court packing, massive tax hikes, energy dependence again, millions of job losses, National Firearms Database...the list goes on and on...

Scary tim for sure. Help us ACB, you're our only hope...

Also gonna need the Conservative Supremes to all stay alive for the next 4 years. Lose one and it's back to a lib court because that fag Roberts votes with the libs on everything. Bush fucked that appointment up beyond belief.

They're going to pack the court so their lives will be irrelevant.

I tend to not believe that. The Dems are dumb, but doing that loses them at least one chamber of Congress in 2022, and probably the Presidency in 2024. That policy is wildly unpopular with voters.

I don't think the Dems GAF what is popular with voters.

They're out for blood.

The GOP played dirty to get ACB in there. Winners win but yeah DNC is going to retaliate for that move. Im not a fan of the current DNC talking points to pack the courts which is basically just adding justices carte blanche.

Buttigieg had an interesting proposal to depoliticise the process which I guess could still fall under the umbrella of court packing given the current balance. GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices. This initial allotment does not change. Those initial 10 justices appoint 5 more. 15 justices in total. This was floated well before RBG/ACB.

"GOP played dirty to get ACB in there."

Nothing dirty occurred

"GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices."

Things that people propose who have no understanding of the judicial branch.

Ok then explain to me why it's a terrible idea.

GrundleStiltzkin

RedRocket said:

RaceBannon said:

RedRocket said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Swaye said:

...isn't Biden beating Trump, it's that the Dems look likely to win the Senate as well. Can you imagine what is about to happen with unified socialist government? Court packing, massive tax hikes, energy dependence again, millions of job losses, National Firearms Database...the list goes on and on...

Scary tim for sure. Help us ACB, you're our only hope...

Also gonna need the Conservative Supremes to all stay alive for the next 4 years. Lose one and it's back to a lib court because that fag Roberts votes with the libs on everything. Bush fucked that appointment up beyond belief.

They're going to pack the court so their lives will be irrelevant.

I tend to not believe that. The Dems are dumb, but doing that loses them at least one chamber of Congress in 2022, and probably the Presidency in 2024. That policy is wildly unpopular with voters.

I don't think the Dems GAF what is popular with voters.

They're out for blood.

The GOP played dirty to get ACB in there. Winners win but yeah DNC is going to retaliate for that move. Im not a fan of the current DNC talking points to pack the courts which is basically just adding justices carte blanche.

Buttigieg had an interesting proposal to depoliticise the process which I guess could still fall under the umbrella of court packing given the current balance. GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices. This initial allotment does not change. Those initial 10 justices appoint 5 more. 15 justices in total. This was floated well before RBG/ACB.

The GOP used existing rules to nominate and vote in favor of a Supreme Court Justice

Nothing dirty about it at all

Thanks to Harry Reid it was possible. Maybe the dems can change some more stuff that blows up in their face

The playing dirty is setting a precedent that if you control congress you delay or expedite court appointments until you get your guy into the executive office. It's supposed to be an apolitical office.

Playing dirty is not hearing an appointment for Garland on the grounds that it was an election year and then ramming through ACB a month before the election. I never said that it was against the rules but it was massively hypocritical.

That I agree with.

Houhusky

RedRocket said:

RaceBannon said:

RedRocket said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Swaye said:

...isn't Biden beating Trump, it's that the Dems look likely to win the Senate as well. Can you imagine what is about to happen with unified socialist government? Court packing, massive tax hikes, energy dependence again, millions of job losses, National Firearms Database...the list goes on and on...

Scary tim for sure. Help us ACB, you're our only hope...

Also gonna need the Conservative Supremes to all stay alive for the next 4 years. Lose one and it's back to a lib court because that fag Roberts votes with the libs on everything. Bush fucked that appointment up beyond belief.

They're going to pack the court so their lives will be irrelevant.

I tend to not believe that. The Dems are dumb, but doing that loses them at least one chamber of Congress in 2022, and probably the Presidency in 2024. That policy is wildly unpopular with voters.

I don't think the Dems GAF what is popular with voters.

They're out for blood.

The GOP played dirty to get ACB in there. Winners win but yeah DNC is going to retaliate for that move. Im not a fan of the current DNC talking points to pack the courts which is basically just adding justices carte blanche.

Buttigieg had an interesting proposal to depoliticise the process which I guess could still fall under the umbrella of court packing given the current balance. GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices. This initial allotment does not change. Those initial 10 justices appoint 5 more. 15 justices in total. This was floated well before RBG/ACB.

The GOP used existing rules to nominate and vote in favor of a Supreme Court Justice

Nothing dirty about it at all

Thanks to Harry Reid it was possible. Maybe the dems can change some more stuff that blows up in their face

The playing dirty is setting a precedent that if you control congress you delay or expedite court appointments until you get your guy into the executive office. It's supposed to be an apolitical office.

Playing dirty is not hearing an appointment for Garland on the grounds that it was an election year and then ramming through ACB a month before the election. I never said that it was against the rules but it was massively hypocritical.

2016 Obama was a democrat, the Senate was controlled by republicans

2020 Trump is a Republican, the senate was controlled by republicans

This isn't complicated

PurpleThrobber

dnc said:

RedRocket said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Swaye said:

...isn't Biden beating Trump, it's that the Dems look likely to win the Senate as well. Can you imagine what is about to happen with unified socialist government? Court packing, massive tax hikes, energy dependence again, millions of job losses, National Firearms Database...the list goes on and on...

Scary tim for sure. Help us ACB, you're our only hope...

Also gonna need the Conservative Supremes to all stay alive for the next 4 years. Lose one and it's back to a lib court because that fag Roberts votes with the libs on everything. Bush fucked that appointment up beyond belief.

They're going to pack the court so their lives will be irrelevant.

I tend to not believe that. The Dems are dumb, but doing that loses them at least one chamber of Congress in 2022, and probably the Presidency in 2024. That policy is wildly unpopular with voters.

I don't think the Dems GAF what is popular with voters.

They're out for blood.

The GOP played dirty to get ACB in there. Winners win but yeah DNC is going to retaliate for that move. Im not a fan of the current DNC talking points to pack the courts which is basically just adding justices carte blanche.

Buttigieg had an interesting proposal to depoliticise the process which I guess could still fall under the umbrella of court packing given the current balance. GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices. This initial allotment does not change. Those initial 10 justices appoint 5 more. 15 justices in total. This was floated well before RBG/ACB.

The GOP didn't do anything wrong to get ACB in there. They followed the law and decades of precedent.

They played real dirty to get Gorsuch in there.

They gave that one back by getting the @dnc's own guy in there with Roberts....

Fucking W.

GrundleStiltzkin

Houhusky said:

RedRocket said:

RaceBannon said:

RedRocket said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Swaye said:

...isn't Biden beating Trump, it's that the Dems look likely to win the Senate as well. Can you imagine what is about to happen with unified socialist government? Court packing, massive tax hikes, energy dependence again, millions of job losses, National Firearms Database...the list goes on and on...

Scary tim for sure. Help us ACB, you're our only hope...

Also gonna need the Conservative Supremes to all stay alive for the next 4 years. Lose one and it's back to a lib court because that fag Roberts votes with the libs on everything. Bush fucked that appointment up beyond belief.

They're going to pack the court so their lives will be irrelevant.

I tend to not believe that. The Dems are dumb, but doing that loses them at least one chamber of Congress in 2022, and probably the Presidency in 2024. That policy is wildly unpopular with voters.

I don't think the Dems GAF what is popular with voters.

They're out for blood.

The GOP played dirty to get ACB in there. Winners win but yeah DNC is going to retaliate for that move. Im not a fan of the current DNC talking points to pack the courts which is basically just adding justices carte blanche.

Buttigieg had an interesting proposal to depoliticise the process which I guess could still fall under the umbrella of court packing given the current balance. GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices. This initial allotment does not change. Those initial 10 justices appoint 5 more. 15 justices in total. This was floated well before RBG/ACB.

The GOP used existing rules to nominate and vote in favor of a Supreme Court Justice

Nothing dirty about it at all

Thanks to Harry Reid it was possible. Maybe the dems can change some more stuff that blows up in their face

The playing dirty is setting a precedent that if you control congress you delay or expedite court appointments until you get your guy into the executive office. It's supposed to be an apolitical office.

Playing dirty is not hearing an appointment for Garland on the grounds that it was an election year and then ramming through ACB a month before the election. I never said that it was against the rules but it was massively hypocritical.

2016 Obama was a democrat, the Senate was controlled by republicans

2020 Trump is a Republican, the senate was controlled by republicans

This isn't complicated

And Harry Reid ditched filibuster for expediency.

RaceBannon

RedRocket said:

RaceBannon said:

RedRocket said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Swaye said:

...isn't Biden beating Trump, it's that the Dems look likely to win the Senate as well. Can you imagine what is about to happen with unified socialist government? Court packing, massive tax hikes, energy dependence again, millions of job losses, National Firearms Database...the list goes on and on...

Scary tim for sure. Help us ACB, you're our only hope...

Also gonna need the Conservative Supremes to all stay alive for the next 4 years. Lose one and it's back to a lib court because that fag Roberts votes with the libs on everything. Bush fucked that appointment up beyond belief.

They're going to pack the court so their lives will be irrelevant.

I tend to not believe that. The Dems are dumb, but doing that loses them at least one chamber of Congress in 2022, and probably the Presidency in 2024. That policy is wildly unpopular with voters.

I don't think the Dems GAF what is popular with voters.

They're out for blood.

The GOP played dirty to get ACB in there. Winners win but yeah DNC is going to retaliate for that move. Im not a fan of the current DNC talking points to pack the courts which is basically just adding justices carte blanche.

Buttigieg had an interesting proposal to depoliticise the process which I guess could still fall under the umbrella of court packing given the current balance. GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices. This initial allotment does not change. Those initial 10 justices appoint 5 more. 15 justices in total. This was floated well before RBG/ACB.

The GOP used existing rules to nominate and vote in favor of a Supreme Court Justice

Nothing dirty about it at all

Thanks to Harry Reid it was possible. Maybe the dems can change some more stuff that blows up in their face

The playing dirty is setting a precedent that if you control congress you delay or expedite court appointments until you get your guy into the executive office. It's supposed to be an apolitical office.

Playing dirty is not hearing an appointment for Garland on the grounds that it was an election year and then ramming through ACB a month before the election. I never said that it was against the rules but it was massively hypocritical.

Mitch didn't need to give any reason not to hold a vote on Garland. Nor did he need to wait on ACB.

Hypocrisy is a meaningless charge in politics.

Kavanaugh got treated dirty. So did Thomas. And Bork

Shit happens

RedRocket

Houhusky said:

RedRocket said:

RaceBannon said:

RedRocket said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Swaye said:

...isn't Biden beating Trump, it's that the Dems look likely to win the Senate as well. Can you imagine what is about to happen with unified socialist government? Court packing, massive tax hikes, energy dependence again, millions of job losses, National Firearms Database...the list goes on and on...

Scary tim for sure. Help us ACB, you're our only hope...

Also gonna need the Conservative Supremes to all stay alive for the next 4 years. Lose one and it's back to a lib court because that fag Roberts votes with the libs on everything. Bush fucked that appointment up beyond belief.

They're going to pack the court so their lives will be irrelevant.

I tend to not believe that. The Dems are dumb, but doing that loses them at least one chamber of Congress in 2022, and probably the Presidency in 2024. That policy is wildly unpopular with voters.

I don't think the Dems GAF what is popular with voters.

They're out for blood.

The GOP played dirty to get ACB in there. Winners win but yeah DNC is going to retaliate for that move. Im not a fan of the current DNC talking points to pack the courts which is basically just adding justices carte blanche.

Buttigieg had an interesting proposal to depoliticise the process which I guess could still fall under the umbrella of court packing given the current balance. GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices. This initial allotment does not change. Those initial 10 justices appoint 5 more. 15 justices in total. This was floated well before RBG/ACB.

The GOP used existing rules to nominate and vote in favor of a Supreme Court Justice

Nothing dirty about it at all

Thanks to Harry Reid it was possible. Maybe the dems can change some more stuff that blows up in their face

The playing dirty is setting a precedent that if you control congress you delay or expedite court appointments until you get your guy into the executive office. It's supposed to be an apolitical office.

Playing dirty is not hearing an appointment for Garland on the grounds that it was an election year and then ramming through ACB a month before the election. I never said that it was against the rules but it was massively hypocritical.

2016 Obama was a democrat, the Senate was controlled by republicans

2020 Trump is a Republican, the senate was controlled by republicans

This isn't complicated

Mind blown...so whoever controls senate can just delay an appointment for how long?

RaceBannon

It took a year to get Gorsuch in

SFGbob

Houhusky said:

RedRocket said:

RaceBannon said:

RedRocket said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Swaye said:

...isn't Biden beating Trump, it's that the Dems look likely to win the Senate as well. Can you imagine what is about to happen with unified socialist government? Court packing, massive tax hikes, energy dependence again, millions of job losses, National Firearms Database...the list goes on and on...

Scary tim for sure. Help us ACB, you're our only hope...

Also gonna need the Conservative Supremes to all stay alive for the next 4 years. Lose one and it's back to a lib court because that fag Roberts votes with the libs on everything. Bush fucked that appointment up beyond belief.

They're going to pack the court so their lives will be irrelevant.

I tend to not believe that. The Dems are dumb, but doing that loses them at least one chamber of Congress in 2022, and probably the Presidency in 2024. That policy is wildly unpopular with voters.

I don't think the Dems GAF what is popular with voters.

They're out for blood.

The GOP played dirty to get ACB in there. Winners win but yeah DNC is going to retaliate for that move. Im not a fan of the current DNC talking points to pack the courts which is basically just adding justices carte blanche.

Buttigieg had an interesting proposal to depoliticise the process which I guess could still fall under the umbrella of court packing given the current balance. GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices. This initial allotment does not change. Those initial 10 justices appoint 5 more. 15 justices in total. This was floated well before RBG/ACB.

The GOP used existing rules to nominate and vote in favor of a Supreme Court Justice

Nothing dirty about it at all

Thanks to Harry Reid it was possible. Maybe the dems can change some more stuff that blows up in their face

The playing dirty is setting a precedent that if you control congress you delay or expedite court appointments until you get your guy into the executive office. It's supposed to be an apolitical office.

Playing dirty is not hearing an appointment for Garland on the grounds that it was an election year and then ramming through ACB a month before the election. I never said that it was against the rules but it was massively hypocritical.

2016 Obama was a democrat, the Senate was controlled by republicans

2020 Trump is a Republican, the senate was controlled by republicans

This isn't complicated

Yeah, that sounds really dirty.

GrundleStiltzkin

RaceBannon said:

RedRocket said:

RaceBannon said:

RedRocket said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

dnc said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Swaye said:

...isn't Biden beating Trump, it's that the Dems look likely to win the Senate as well. Can you imagine what is about to happen with unified socialist government? Court packing, massive tax hikes, energy dependence again, millions of job losses, National Firearms Database...the list goes on and on...

Scary tim for sure. Help us ACB, you're our only hope...

Also gonna need the Conservative Supremes to all stay alive for the next 4 years. Lose one and it's back to a lib court because that fag Roberts votes with the libs on everything. Bush fucked that appointment up beyond belief.

They're going to pack the court so their lives will be irrelevant.

I tend to not believe that. The Dems are dumb, but doing that loses them at least one chamber of Congress in 2022, and probably the Presidency in 2024. That policy is wildly unpopular with voters.

I don't think the Dems GAF what is popular with voters.

They're out for blood.

The GOP played dirty to get ACB in there. Winners win but yeah DNC is going to retaliate for that move. Im not a fan of the current DNC talking points to pack the courts which is basically just adding justices carte blanche.

Buttigieg had an interesting proposal to depoliticise the process which I guess could still fall under the umbrella of court packing given the current balance. GOP gets 5 justices. DNC gets 5 justices. This initial allotment does not change. Those initial 10 justices appoint 5 more. 15 justices in total. This was floated well before RBG/ACB.

The GOP used existing rules to nominate and vote in favor of a Supreme Court Justice

Nothing dirty about it at all

Thanks to Harry Reid it was possible. Maybe the dems can change some more stuff that blows up in their face

The playing dirty is setting a precedent that if you control congress you delay or expedite court appointments until you get your guy into the executive office. It's supposed to be an apolitical office.

Playing dirty is not hearing an appointment for Garland on the grounds that it was an election year and then ramming through ACB a month before the election. I never said that it was against the rules but it was massively hypocritical.

Mitch didn't need to give any reason not to hold a vote on Garland. Nor did he need to wait on ACB.

Hypocrisy is a meaningless charge in politics.

Kavanaugh got treated dirty. So did Thomas. And Bork

Shit happens

Agree!