Washington football’s young offensive line has a high ceiling

DerekJohnson

https://thehuskyhaul.com/2020/10/15/washington-football-young-offensive-line-high-ceiling/

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Thanks Taft!

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

The headline was enticing but then I realized the Husky Haul was your source.

PurpleBaze

They're awfully young!

doogie

Gonna be Great in two years, 3 years tops

BroadcastingDawg

How is the OL young? 2 SR, 1 JR, 2 SO... all of which have played a lot.

Oregon's OL has played a combined 23 games and averages just 62 career snaps per player.

bananasnblondes

BroadcastingDawg said:

How is the OL young? 2 SR, 1 JR, 2 SO... all of which have played a lot.

Oregon's OL has played a combined 23 games and averages just 62 career snaps per player.

Probably because the 2 seniors and 1 junior are the only guys in the room for those classes. As a whole, the OL group is very young. Oregon's starting OL has less snaps but they are about the same as us in terms of years experience (I think I saw they are likely starting 2 seniors, 2 juniors, and a soph)

BroadcastingDawg

bananasnblondes said:

BroadcastingDawg said:

How is the OL young? 2 SR, 1 JR, 2 SO... all of which have played a lot.

Oregon's OL has played a combined 23 games and averages just 62 career snaps per player.

Probably because the 2 seniors and 1 junior are the only guys in the room for those classes. As a whole, the OL group is very young. Oregon's starting OL has less snaps but they are about the same as us in terms of years experience (I think I saw they are likely starting 2 seniors, 2 juniors, and a soph)

It's curious why Oregon is getting such a nod in the early juncture...

That OL with an inexperienced QB would scare the hell out of me as a fan.

chuck

BroadcastingDawg said:

bananasnblondes said:

BroadcastingDawg said:

How is the OL young? 2 SR, 1 JR, 2 SO... all of which have played a lot.

Oregon's OL has played a combined 23 games and averages just 62 career snaps per player.

Probably because the 2 seniors and 1 junior are the only guys in the room for those classes. As a whole, the OL group is very young. Oregon's starting OL has less snaps but they are about the same as us in terms of years experience (I think I saw they are likely starting 2 seniors, 2 juniors, and a soph)

It's curious why Oregon is getting such a nod in the early juncture...

That OL with an inexperienced QB would scare the hell out of me as a fan.

That doesn't help them win and preseason position rankings only matter to Preston, DJduck and lawsandll. If there's any point in arguing about it that will come after some games are played.

BroadcastingDawg

chuck said:

BroadcastingDawg said:

bananasnblondes said:

BroadcastingDawg said:

How is the OL young? 2 SR, 1 JR, 2 SO... all of which have played a lot.

Oregon's OL has played a combined 23 games and averages just 62 career snaps per player.

Probably because the 2 seniors and 1 junior are the only guys in the room for those classes. As a whole, the OL group is very young. Oregon's starting OL has less snaps but they are about the same as us in terms of years experience (I think I saw they are likely starting 2 seniors, 2 juniors, and a soph)

It's curious why Oregon is getting such a nod in the early juncture...

That OL with an inexperienced QB would scare the hell out of me as a fan.

That doesn't help them win and preseason position rankings only matter to Preston, DJduck and lawsandll. If there's any point in arguing about it that will come after some games are played.

I mean yes and no.

In a shortened season I'd argue starting higher in the rankings gives you a pretty big boost in perception + opportunity. Oregon's first 5 games are a joke and if they start 5-0 they're likely to get be near the top 4.

If UW starts 6-0 before Oregon... do they get the same respect starting outside the top 25? I doubt it and it could go a long ways in determining whether a Pac 12 team makes the playoff.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

Clemson, Bammer, and Ohio State have young players. Win, beat Oregon, or GTFO

All the Doogs who makes excuses for 8-5 can light themselves on fire

Pitchfork51

Like a harry potter style cupboard

dnc

BroadcastingDawg said:

chuck said:

BroadcastingDawg said:

bananasnblondes said:

BroadcastingDawg said:

How is the OL young? 2 SR, 1 JR, 2 SO... all of which have played a lot.

Oregon's OL has played a combined 23 games and averages just 62 career snaps per player.

Probably because the 2 seniors and 1 junior are the only guys in the room for those classes. As a whole, the OL group is very young. Oregon's starting OL has less snaps but they are about the same as us in terms of years experience (I think I saw they are likely starting 2 seniors, 2 juniors, and a soph)

It's curious why Oregon is getting such a nod in the early juncture...

That OL with an inexperienced QB would scare the hell out of me as a fan.

That doesn't help them win and preseason position rankings only matter to Preston, DJduck and lawsandll. If there's any point in arguing about it that will come after some games are played.

I mean yes and no.

In a shortened season I'd argue starting higher in the rankings gives you a pretty big boost in perception + opportunity. Oregon's first 5 games are a joke and if they start 5-0 they're likely to get be near the top 4.

If UW starts 6-0 before Oregon... do they get the same respect starting outside the top 25? I doubt it and it could go a long ways in determining whether a Pac 12 team makes the playoff.

Agree with this

KidsInCagesDawg

Twisted Sister was a shitty group

bananasnblondes

KidsInCagesDawg said:

Twisted Sister was a shitty group

This is the kind of insight I come here for.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

KidsInCagesDawg said:

Twisted Sister was a shitty group

Edwin_Bambino

Cascade front or GTFO

AOG

they will be ready to rumble or GTFO