The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).
Then make the rule a 4 year gap.
10 is absolutely fucked.
The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7
I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.
The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.
That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.
I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.
It doesn't make sense. It's also still not legal and irrelevant to this bill.
That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.
I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
Up to a 10 year difference in age. You can manage that math? THAT MEANS AN 18 YEAR OLD CAN MOLEST AN 8 YEAR OLD AND NOT BE A SEX OFFENDER! A liberal judge (Kali is loaded with them) can not name them a sex offender. If it doesn't make it legal exactly what does it make it? Why do they need a bill if banging kids is OK already?
That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.
I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
Up to a 10 year difference in age. You can manage that math? THAT MEANS AN 18 YEAR OLD CAN MOLEST AN 8 YEAR OLD AND NOT BE A SEX OFFENDER! A liberal judge (Kali is loaded with them) can not name them a sex offender. If it doesn't make it legal exactly what does it make it? Why do they need a bill if banging kids is OK already?
I'll wait.
I think there is a provision that all bets are off if the underage person is less than 14 years old. Still, a 15 year old and a 25 year old are not exactly on equal footing.
That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.
I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
Up to a 10 year difference in age. You can manage that math? THAT MEANS AN 18 YEAR OLD CAN MOLEST AN 8 YEAR OLD AND NOT BE A SEX OFFENDER! A liberal judge (Kali is loaded with them) can not name them a sex offender. If it doesn't make it legal exactly what does it make it? Why do they need a bill if banging kids is OK already?
I'll wait.
You do understand that something can be illegal, and still include a lengthy prison sentence, without requiring the sex offender designation, right?
The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).
Then make the rule a 4 year gap.
10 is absolutely fucked.
The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7
I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.
The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.
58 divided by 2 = 29 - 7 = 22
My assistant was 22 when I was 58 and I felt like a dirty old man. The fact that I am is not relevant. But I was married and she would have said no anyway so whatever
I was told that the priests were chasing young boys was because the Church prohibited them from marrying hot women. Not sure how that applied to gay as phuck former Portland mayor Sam Adams and his underage intern.
I mean the celibacy of the priesthood is problematic (lol!) but I think the required singleness attracts those wrestling with homosexual tendencies as much as it produces them.
That's my very outside perspective. Would love to hear @GrundleStiltzkin's diagnosis.
100%. It’s a good place for those men to hide, especially ones from Catholic families that probably wouldn’t fully accept them being gay.
That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.
I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
Up to a 10 year difference in age. You can manage that math? THAT MEANS AN 18 YEAR OLD CAN MOLEST AN 8 YEAR OLD AND NOT BE A SEX OFFENDER! A liberal judge (Kali is loaded with them) can not name them a sex offender. If it doesn't make it legal exactly what does it make it? Why do they need a bill if banging kids is OK already?
I'll wait.
You do understand that something can be illegal, and still include a lengthy prison sentence, without requiring the sex offender designation, right?
The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).
Then make the rule a 4 year gap.
10 is absolutely fucked.
The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7
I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.
The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.
58 divided by 2 = 29 - 7 = 22
My assistant was 22 when I was 58 and I felt like a dirty old man. The fact that I am is not relevant. But I was married and she would have said no anyway so whatever
Its a "plus" 7
58/2 + 7 = 36+
sneaky, trickster, old man... better watch yourself before you get sent to one of the covid community homes.
The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).
Then make the rule a 4 year gap.
10 is absolutely fucked.
The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7
I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.
The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.
58 divided by 2 = 29 - 7 = 22
My assistant was 22 when I was 58 and I felt like a dirty old man. The fact that I am is not relevant. But I was married and she would have said no anyway so whatever
Its a "plus" 7
58/2 + 7 = 36+
sneaky, trickster, old man... better watch yourself before you get sent to one of the covid community homes.
The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).
Then make the rule a 4 year gap.
10 is absolutely fucked.
The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7
I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.
The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.
The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).
Then make the rule a 4 year gap.
10 is absolutely fucked.
The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7
I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.
The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.
The generally accepted rule by bitchfork is < 25 and hot
The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).
Then make the rule a 4 year gap.
10 is absolutely fucked.
The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7
I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.
The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.
58 divided by 2 = 29 - 7 = 22
My assistant was 22 when I was 58 and I felt like a dirty old man. The fact that I am is not relevant. But I was married and she would have said no anyway so whatever
It's Plus 7 years for the lower end but props for having a 22 year old as an assistant. The Throbber is in virtually the same scenario right now with a perky assistant. Good thing she works 2400 miles away.
Your lower limit is 36 years old. But aside from child porn laws, there is no lower limit for simply looking at the merchandise. 22 is legit for lust.
Comments
I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.
The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.
I'll wait.
This isn't hard.
My assistant was 22 when I was 58 and I felt like a dirty old man. The fact that I am is not relevant. But I was married and she would have said no anyway so whatever
58/2 + 7 = 36+
sneaky, trickster, old man... better watch yourself before you get sent to one of the covid community homes.
Your lower limit is 36 years old. But aside from child porn laws, there is no lower limit for simply looking at the merchandise. 22 is legit for lust.