Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Obama virus?

24

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,281
    Sledog said:


    This has legs!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,905 Standard Supporter
    So, within minutes Race called it fake and it was and now no conservative is pushing it. Unlike mello, the dazzler and IC who are still pushing the Russian collusion hoax.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,703 Founders Club
    The virus came out of a lab, but as a result of incompetence
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    WestlinnDuck said:

    So, within minutes Race called it fake and it was and now no conservative is pushing it. Unlike mello, the dazzler and IC who are still pushing the Russian collusion hoax.

    The photo is fake. Some tax dollars did end up at that actual lab in China, though. That’s factual. ~$600,000 for reasons unknown.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Embarassing.

    @HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.

    Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.

    Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html

    John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
    By Elise Labott, CNN
    Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
    I'll bite.

    You only read the headline, right?
    I mean, we could just not given them $55 billion of the Shah governments money to use for terrorism if they want to use it for terrori
    Are you DJDuck's retarded son?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Embarassing.

    @HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.

    Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.

    Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html

    John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
    By Elise Labott, CNN
    Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
    I'll bite.

    You only read the headline, right?
    Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.

    I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.

    “When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”

    Go ahead, take a shot at it.


    Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Embarassing.

    @HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.

    Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.

    Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html

    John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
    By Elise Labott, CNN
    Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
    I'll bite.

    You only read the headline, right?
    Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.

    I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.

    “When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”

    Go ahead, take a shot at it.


    Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.
    Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.

    Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Embarassing.

    @HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.

    Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.

    Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html

    John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
    By Elise Labott, CNN
    Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
    I'll bite.

    You only read the headline, right?
    Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.

    I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.

    “When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”

    Go ahead, take a shot at it.


    Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.
    Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.

    Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
    It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Embarassing.

    @HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.

    Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.

    Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html

    John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
    By Elise Labott, CNN
    Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
    I'll bite.

    You only read the headline, right?
    Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.

    I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.

    “When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”

    Go ahead, take a shot at it.


    Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.
    Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.

    Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
    It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"
    As we say

    Fuck off, Lightweight.

    Typical Democrat. Can’t refute the actual proof so it’s Clown Car time. @HHusky, driver needed for your new recruit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    BennyBeaver said:

    Embarassing.

    @HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.

    Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.

    Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html

    John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
    By Elise Labott, CNN
    Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
    I'll bite.

    You only read the headline, right?
    Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.

    I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.

    “When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”

    Go ahead, take a shot at it.


    Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.
    Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.

    Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
    It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"
    As we say

    Fuck off, Lightweight.

    Typical Democrat. Can’t refute the actual proof so it’s Clown Car time. @HHusky, driver needed for your new recruit.
    Typical tugtard. Change the subject, move the goalpost, link grandma memes, link articles and don't read them and if you do don't read for comprehension.

    could, might, labeled, not likely, etc.

    Thanks for playing dullard.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter