Yesterday there was a thread bashing the moderation on the board. A poster said he didn't care about the staffs' opinion. Fetters asked "serious question, then why are you here" sort of post. I responded "believe it or not, a lot are here for the message boards and community and don't care what you write or your opinions" and concluded with "I don't understand why this hasn't been figured out or well understood by now." The entire thread went poof shortly after. Typical.
They are too egotistic and actually believe people are there because of their supposed insight and access. They don't comprehend the fact their "bidness" is floated by the posters and the community; not them. Thats the problem.
Kim thinks he is a marketing whiz. Got feed the fish with those little teasers and keep them coming back shit. This is a guy who runs a message board and hates half his posters.
Kim thinks he is a marketing whiz. Got feed the fish with those little teasers and keep them coming back shit. This is a guy who runs a message board and hates half his posters.
no, half his posters hate him. Actually 98% of his posters hate him.
Since you guys love to beat dead horses, I will add to the beating of the dead horse.
In 2002, it had become obvious to me, with subscriptions both to Doogman and to Ruth's site, that Ruth, for all her weaknesses, was scooping Doogman almost every time. I am sure most of you here now complaining about Doogman would have denied that fact at that time, since all Doogman people love to mock Ruth. I do also, and am not a fan of either site, so my only point is that it has been obvious for over a decade that Doogman is a fake.
Since you guys love to beat dead horses, I will add to the beating of the dead horse.
In 2002, it had become obvious to me, with subscriptions both to Doogman and to Ruth's site, that Ruth, for all her weaknesses, was scooping Doogman almost every time. I am sure most of you here now complaining about Doogman would have denied that fact at that time, since all Doogman people love to mock Ruth. I do also, and am not a fan of either site, so my only point is that it has been obvious for over a decade that Doogman is a fake.
I think most that blasted Ruth blasted her for some of the stories we heard about her methods and then for the peKKKer heads comments on MySpace.
What we didn't realize (or maybe it wasn't happening at the time) was that Ektard was as bad a teen boy stocker as Roof.
Comments
They are too egotistic and actually believe people are there because of their supposed insight and access. They don't comprehend the fact their "bidness" is floated by the posters and the community; not them. Thats the problem.
In 2002, it had become obvious to me, with subscriptions both to Doogman and to Ruth's site, that Ruth, for all her weaknesses, was scooping Doogman almost every time. I am sure most of you here now complaining about Doogman would have denied that fact at that time, since all Doogman people love to mock Ruth. I do also, and am not a fan of either site, so my only point is that it has been obvious for over a decade that Doogman is a fake.
What we didn't realize (or maybe it wasn't happening at the time) was that Ektard was as bad a teen boy stocker as Roof.
Fuck, why do attorneys always insist on fighting with other attorneys?