Let's bring Russia back into the G7
Comments
-
Even have a trip down memory lane on the Russian pipeline to Germany.SFGbob said:
You notice how the usual dumbfucks all jumped in with both feet on this story? I also like Owl trying to keep hope alive about the Dossier's veracity.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. @insinceredawginsinceredawg said:
This post isn't going to age wellNorthwestFresh said:
There aren’t briefings on every anonymously-sourced bullshit the NYT Fake News publishes.insinceredawg said:The NYT was apparently briefed on the bounties before the White House. Move along, nothing to see here
“Alleged” means something, dipshit. -
R I P.NorthwestFresh said:While the typical Leftist Stooges fell for more anonymous bullshit designed solely to distract the idiots, Russia is going forward in constructing their pipeline so Germany can buy that sweet, sweet Putin fossil fuel energy. Nobody knew we put new sanctions on Putin for this pipeline because our ‘journalistic’ media is a propaganda scam, but Germany doesn’t care if they fund Putin.
https://euobserver.com/foreign/148805
Russia: 'Nothing will stop' Germany gas pipeline
"Nothing will stop" Nord Stream 2, Russia has said, after new US sanctions on a pipeline that is seeing the EU side with Russia against its transatlantic ally.
"Our view remains the same: nothing will stop the finalisation of Nord Stream 2 [NS2]. And we leave to Germany and other EU member states to pass judgement on such US measures," Russia's ambassador to the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, told EUobserver on Monday (29 June).
Swiss pipe-laying ship stopped work after first round of US sanctions (Photo: nord-stream2.com)
The Russian-owned firm building the pipe from Russia to Germany, the Nord Stream 2 consortium in Switzerland, was equally bullish.
"Our shareholder and the five financial investors are fully committed to the project, as are Nord Stream 2's suppliers," it told this website, also on Monday.
But He nailed this one. -
No it isn’t. Not well at all.insinceredawg said:
This post isn't going to age wellNorthwestFresh said:
There aren’t briefings on every anonymously-sourced bullshit the NYT Fake News publishes.insinceredawg said:The NYT was apparently briefed on the bounties before the White House. Move along, nothing to see here
“Alleged” means something, dipshit. -
@insinceredawg’s silence speaks volumes.doogie said:
No it isn’t. Not well at all.insinceredawg said:
This post isn't going to age wellNorthwestFresh said:
There aren’t briefings on every anonymously-sourced bullshit the NYT Fake News publishes.insinceredawg said:The NYT was apparently briefed on the bounties before the White House. Move along, nothing to see here
“Alleged” means something, dipshit. -
Seriously, what did that dumbfuck ever get right?MikeDamone said:
@insinceredawg’s silence speaks volumes.doogie said:
No it isn’t. Not well at all.insinceredawg said:
This post isn't going to age wellNorthwestFresh said:
There aren’t briefings on every anonymously-sourced bullshit the NYT Fake News publishes.insinceredawg said:The NYT was apparently briefed on the bounties before the White House. Move along, nothing to see here
“Alleged” means something, dipshit. -
insinceredawg said:
This post isn't going to age wellNorthwestFresh said:
There aren’t briefings on every anonymously-sourced bullshit the NYT Fake News publishes.insinceredawg said:The NYT was apparently briefed on the bounties before the White House. Move along, nothing to see here
“Alleged” means something, dipshit.
