Is our on Media trying to start a civil war?

Comments
-
The headline/click bait writers certainly are.
-
-
If it bleeds it leads
-
Still, they are taking journalistic sensationalism to uncharted and dangerous waters lately. But I know you know this, because gay cabal and all.RaceBannon said:If it bleeds it leads
-
This isn't just if it bleeds it leads. This is an intentional misrepresentation/omission of the facts in order to pursue an anti-cop racist attack on the police.RaceBannon said:If it bleeds it leads
Funny how the MSM has no problem mentioning the race of people when it's done to whip up resentment against the cops and white people. -
-
It's simple economics. It's easier and less expensive for news agencies to create news than it is to investigate it and find it. It's disgusting, but a very smart and effective business model. They no longer need to pay higher salaried investigative journalists. Now they can create fear and headlines themselves and send in less expensive, low level employees to cover it.
-
Seems like a candidate to be put out there are a real hero.
"Detectives with the sheriff's Major Crimes Unit were tracking a man who was wanted for kidnapping, spousal assault and assault with a deadly weapon but when they tried to stop his car, he opened the door and began shooting, authorities said." -
Your modern day Alamo is what I'm hearing.MikeDamone said:Seems like a candidate to be put out there are a real hero.
"Detectives with the sheriff's Major Crimes Unit were tracking a man who was wanted for kidnapping, spousal assault and assault with a deadly weapon but when they tried to stop his car, he opened the door and began shooting, authorities said." -
Pretty convinced this is what multiple foreign actors who finance our media are interested in. Nobody has been talking about China and their complicity in a world pandemic for a month.
-
My favorite example is when a “news” service conducts a poll to create news and then reports on the “news” they themselves created. It’s so lazy and so easily to manipulate.greenblood said:It's simple economics. It's easier and less expensive for news agencies to create news than it is to investigate it and find it. It's disgusting, but a very smart and effective business model. They no longer need to pay higher salaried investigative journalists. Now they can create fear and headlines themselves and send in less expensive, low level employees to cover it.
-
It's the way of life today. It's not just news. It's network television, movies, music, etc. Just reproductions of the same stuffNorthwestFresh said:
My favorite example is when a “news” service conducts a poll to create news and then reports on the “news” they themselves created. It’s so lazy and so easily to manipulate.greenblood said:It's simple economics. It's easier and less expensive for news agencies to create news than it is to investigate it and find it. It's disgusting, but a very smart and effective business model. They no longer need to pay higher salaried investigative journalists. Now they can create fear and headlines themselves and send in less expensive, low level employees to cover it.
-
Let’s get this scheduled. No Portland St. No Idaho. Just the natty.
-
As WikiLeaks and the JournoList showed, much of the “news” is coordinated between the various “news” services with the assistance of the DNC and intelligence agencies on advancing a narrative. These montages are always a favorite.greenblood said:
It's the way of life today. It's not just news. It's network television, movies, music, etc. Just reproductions of the same stuffNorthwestFresh said:
My favorite example is when a “news” service conducts a poll to create news and then reports on the “news” they themselves created. It’s so lazy and so easily to manipulate.greenblood said:It's simple economics. It's easier and less expensive for news agencies to create news than it is to investigate it and find it. It's disgusting, but a very smart and effective business model. They no longer need to pay higher salaried investigative journalists. Now they can create fear and headlines themselves and send in less expensive, low level employees to cover it.
May 25, 2020
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2020/05/26/drive-bys-celebrate-grim-milestone-of-virus-deaths-2/amp/
WOLF BLITZER: A grim milestone is approaching the coronavirus pandemic! Almost 100,000 Americans have now died…
FREDRICKA WHITFIELD: Closing in on a grim milestone, approaching 100,000!
JIM SCIUTTO: The president spent the weekend playing golf as the nation nears a very grim, a very sad milestone.
TOM LLAMAS: The nation stares down a grim milestone.
ROSEMARY CHURCH: …a grim, new milestone…
CRAIG MELVIN: … another grim milestone…
CHRIS JANSING: …a grim milestone…
PATRICE HARRIS: … certainly a grim milestone…
ALISYN CAMEROTA: …a grim milestone of 100,000 Americans dying.
MONICA ALBA: …the grim milestone of 100,000 deaths.
PAULA REID: The U.S. reaches the grim milestone of 100,000 COVID deaths, a marker the president once said he hoped the country would never see. -
Well sure. Twitter ruined journalism. Now many if not most just either retweet from a bigger name or just plaguirize.shit.fucko.
Often while just reading the headline. And then it is presented to the masses on da teevee. And 75% of the viewers take it as the Gospel. Moar and moar, even made Cooperstown poasters here allow it to creep into their thoughts.
Sad AF.
-
The media has always been evil like this
You think the shit printed in papers was accurate? It was even harder to verify back in the day too -
Maybe so. Real journalism sans some on the local level degraded incrementally since the 70’s. But has absolutely nosedived since Twitter.PostGameOrangeSlices said:The media has always been evil like this
You think the shit printed in papers was accurate? It was even harder to verify back in the day too
With that said there are many lesser known news sources that are quality that wouldn’t be known if not for Twitter. But the tradeoff isn’t close to being worth it imo. -
Accomplices in the Covid 19 Plandemic and the 911 Inside Job
From CNN to Fox News to Your Local News Stations
https://youtu.be/wF0VGnmLExc
Over the last 4 decades, the mainstream media in the United States has been consolidated
from dozens of companies to only 6. -
I genuinely can't tell if you've lost it after misjudging a psych drug dose following the 2014 natty, or if this is a comedic and elaborate shtickoregonblitzkrieg said:Accomplices in the Covid 19 Plandemic and the 911 Inside Job
From CNN to Fox News to Your Local News Stations
https://youtu.be/wF0VGnmLExc
Over the last 4 decades, the mainstream media in the United States has been consolidated
from dozens of companies to only 6.
Either way, chinteresting -
Obk you faggot hollow man you've lost your fucking mind. Gone.
-
This.UW_Doog_Bot said:Pretty convinced this is what multiple foreign actors who finance our media are interested in. Nobody has been talking about China and their complicity in a world pandemic for a month.
-
Hardcore Husky is not a part of this conglomerate BY CHOICE -
Yes
A civil war generates news. -
I like to picnic on a bluff above the battles. It’s something I like to do. I like to do that.greenblood said:Yes
A civil war generates news. -
Hopefully it won't be over alreadyGrundleStiltzkin said:
I like to picnic on a bluff above the battles. It’s something I like to do. I like to do that.greenblood said:Yes
A civil war generates news. -
-
People forget that from 1895 to 1930 Hearst controlled one of the worlds largest media/information companies in the world, was the progenitor for the term "Yellow Journalism" (Fake news), leveraged his newspapers and film companies into political power for both himself and his friends, and successfully pushed the US into the Spanish-American war...
"Please remain. You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war." - Hearst December 1897
3 weeks later the USS Maine exploded, likely due to an accidental fire started in the ammunition or coal stock. Hearst's papers falsely ran with the story that Spain intentionally attacked the ship. "Remember the Main, To hell with Spain." The US declared war against Spain shortly after. -
Almost like that anthrax was from iraq bsHouhusky said:People forget that from 1895 to 1930 Hearst controlled one of the worlds largest media/information companies in the world, was the progenitor for the term "Yellow Journalism" (Fake news), leveraged his newspapers and film companies into political power for both himself and his friends, and successfully pushed the US into the Spanish-American war...
"Please remain. You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war." - Hearst December 1897
3 weeks later the USS Maine exploded, likely due to an accidental fire started in the ammunition or coal stock. Hearst's papers falsely ran with the story that Spain intentionally attacked the ship. "Remember the Main, To hell with Spain." The US declared war against Spain shortly after. -
The media is complicit in the coup which will lead to civil war. They might not like how that turns out!
-
Reminds me how how Bush’s FBI targeted an innocent man in the anthrax letters with help from the media, and Clinton’s FBI targeted Richard Jewell for the Olympic bombing with help from the media. That’s was long before this widespread sharing of information online, too.Sledog said:The media is complicit in the coup which will lead to civil war. They might not like how that turns out!