He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
Entirely justified anywhere in the country. It takes less time for a suspect to turn and fire than your traction time. He turned back as he was shot happens all the time I don't care what color they are.
He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
Entirely justified anywhere in the country. It takes less time for a suspect to turn and fire than your traction time. He turned back as he was shot happens all the time I don't care what color they are.
I said he won’t be convicted, especially what the suspect did, but no way when he turns and runs away is it common sense justified to execute the suspect, meaning kill him. Shoot his calf out, or call for back up and run him down. No reason to kill another human caus he grabbed your taser and ran. And I am way pro police, pod.
He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
That's exactly what my 13 year old kid said, telling.
He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
Entirely justified anywhere in the country. It takes less time for a suspect to turn and fire than your traction time. He turned back as he was shot happens all the time I don't care what color they are.
I said he won’t be convicted, especially what the suspect did, but no way when he turns and runs away is it common sense justified to execute the suspect, meaning kill him. Shoot his calf out, or call for back up and run him down. No reason to kill another human caus he grabbed your taser and ran. And I am way pro police, pod.
When ever you come up with shoot _______ You have no idea what your talking about. They only "wing" people and shoot guns out of hands in movies. Real life doesn't work that way.
A Taser in Georgia is considered a deadly weapon. This same DA charged 6 officers with the crime two weeks ago! So a Taser was deadly then but not now?
This is theatrical bullshit and so obviously wrong that I wonder if he's doing it on purpose on orders from someone else on the left. It will cause more riots.
He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
That's exactly what my 13 year old kid said, telling.
Good God man, does your 13 yo know the difference in anatomy from a liver, lung shot vs a calf or debilitating injury non fatal from a gun shot wound if have to fire involving a fleeing suspect, especially under the current circumstances in the news, which should have no bearing at anytime??!
Hell, I’m on your side but fk, can’t see it common sense wise.
He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
That's exactly what my 13 year old kid said, telling.
Good God man, does your 13 yo know the difference in anatomy from a liver, lung shot vs a calf or debilitating injury non fatal from a gun shot wound if have to fire involving a fleeing suspect, especially under the current circumstances in the news, which should have no bearing at anytime??!
Hell, I’m on your side but fk, can’t see it common sense wise.
The point is, it’s hard enough to hit a moving target when you’re aiming center mass, now you’re saying to shoot him in an extremity. That shot will miss and will most likely take out a bystander. Always aim for the torso.
Exactly. Why would some Deputy Sheriff from another county supplement your force when he/she knows they will be charged with crimes for trying to do their job. Fuck Atlanta. Fuck that DA. Charges BEFORE the GBI investigation results? What a fucking sham.
Exactly. Why would some Deputy Sheriff from another county supplement your force when he/she knows they will be charged with crimes for trying to do their job. Fuck Atlanta. Fuck that DA. Charges BEFORE the GBI investigation results? What a fucking sham.
That DA shouldn't even be on the job. He is being investigated for corruption right now and the facts are showing he is corrupt as hell. I played golf with a sheriff and an FBI agent last week. Both said that this DA is the one guy that has to be shown the door. He is so corrupt they have a hard time keeping faith in the City of Atlanta.
He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
I will pay for ten range sessions and see how many times anyone can hit a small target running away. Throw in darkness, throw in the fact you are also moving. Takers?
Exactly. Why would some Deputy Sheriff from another county supplement your force when he/she knows they will be charged with crimes for trying to do their job. Fuck Atlanta. Fuck that DA. Charges BEFORE the GBI investigation results? What a fucking sham.
That DA shouldn't even be on the job. He is being investigated for corruption right now and the facts are showing he is corrupt as hell. I played golf with a sheriff and an FBI agent last week. Both said that this DA is the one guy that has to be shown the door. He is so corrupt they have a hard time keeping faith in the City of Atlanta.
DA Last week as cop shot suspect with taser- "A Taser is a deadly weapon!"
This week- "We know a taser isn't a deadly weapon!"
We live in Zone Six where some of the sickouts happened last night. Stayed up as late as could listening to the sounds of the night- usually a few sirens up and down Moreland. Nothing like New York or Chicago but enough you need to get used to it so they don't wake you up. Nothing- Heard nothing last night.
Meanwhile the Today show is having a pity party for a guy who was in jail for DUI and beating his kids. Two cops trying to keep the streets safe are fired and one charged with murder. We're fucking screwed.
I don't have a problem with them being on paid leave. I think any time an officer takes someone's life it's reasonable for there to be an investigation before they are back patrolling the streets.
I can't get behind murder charges on this one. I do think they'll get off but jury trials are always wild cards.
No way. They will get convicted of something...anything...because the entire legal system will be scared to death of riots and chaos if they don't. They have 0% chance of getting a fair trial.
Prediction: Verdict. Appeal. Bonded out during Appeal. Reversal or vacated verdict. GBA reconsiders re-trial. Cop pleas out to Reckless Endangerment and keeps his Pension.
Comments
Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.
You have no idea what your talking about. They only "wing" people and shoot guns out of hands in movies. Real life doesn't work that way.
A Taser in Georgia is considered a deadly weapon. This same DA charged 6 officers with the crime two weeks ago! So a Taser was deadly then but not now?
This is theatrical bullshit and so obviously wrong that I wonder if he's doing it on purpose on orders from someone else on the left. It will cause more riots.
Hell, I’m on your side but fk, can’t see it common sense wise.
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/1329966/#Comment_1329966
This week- "We know a taser isn't a deadly weapon!"
We live in Zone Six where some of the sickouts happened last night. Stayed up as late as could listening to the sounds of the night- usually a few sirens up and down Moreland. Nothing like New York or Chicago but enough you need to get used to it so they don't wake you up. Nothing- Heard nothing last night.
Meanwhile the Today show is having a pity party for a guy who was in jail for DUI and beating his kids. Two cops trying to keep the streets safe are fired and one charged with murder. We're fucking screwed.
I can't get behind murder charges on this one. I do think they'll get off but jury trials are always wild cards.