Why shouldn't a Republican President hold a Juneteenth Rally?

SFGbob

The GOP is the political party that was created to end slavery. Why not have a rally on Juneteenth and celebrate that fact?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/slap-face-black-people-trump-faces-backlash-over-rally-juneteenth-n1229891

insinceredawg

Yes, I'm sure Trump supporters just can't wait to celebrate the end of slavery

insinceredawg

Do you find it ironic that the "Party of Lincoln" is crying over the removal of Confederate monuments and names? Why does your party now support traitorous racists?

PurpleThrobber

SFGbob said:

The GOP is the political party that was created to end slavery. Why not have a rally on Juneteenth and celebrate that fact?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/slap-face-black-people-trump-faces-backlash-over-rally-juneteenth-n1229891

INFIDEL!!!!

AAARRGGH! MEAN ORANGE MAN!!

You think maybe the message will be "hey - the GOP freed the slaves.....you've had 50 years of blindly following the Dems...how ya doin' with that choice? Come back home."

Oh....and all those military bases named after Confederate generals that you want re-branded....yeah, that was Wilson and FDR who put the names in place....

Pitchfork51

Juneteenth?

No one outside of texas has ever heard of that shit.

GreenRiverGatorz

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Pitchfork51

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

She needs a boob job. Otherwise cute

SFGbob

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Pitchfork51

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Hrmm...hrmmmm...something something southern strategy

SFGbob

I always knew Clinton was a racist.

PurpleThrobber

Pitchfork51 said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

She needs a boob job. Otherwise cute

Agreed. Though no problem with the little perkies. Nipple sensitivity generally greater/harder.

Pitchfork51

PurpleThrobber said:

Pitchfork51 said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

She needs a boob job. Otherwise cute

Agreed. Though no problem with the little perkies. Nipple sensitivity generally greater/harder.

You're an equal opportunity lover.

GreenRiverGatorz

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?

Pitchfork51

GreenRiverGatorz said:

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?

What you don't seem to get is that it doesn't need to be persuasive. It only needs to highlight the absurd idea that the Dems are the arbiter's of moral correctness.

Trump doesn't need to convert people to win. He just has to keep people home because they realize the Dems are full of shit too.

SFGbob

GreenRiverGatorz said:

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?

Was the question too tough for you?

NorthwestFresh

GreenRiverGatorz said:

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?

Democrats pulling down statues of Democrats and blaming the GOP for it is peak 2020. Democrats do nothing for blacks except for every 4 years when we get racism claims yet again. It really is pathetic.

GreenRiverGatorz

Pitchfork51 said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?

What you don't seem to get is that it doesn't need to be persuasive. It only needs to highlight the absurd idea that the Dems are the arbiter's of moral correctness.

Trump doesn't need to convert people to win. He just has to keep people home because they realize the Dems are full of shit too.

So it's the latter. Got it.

GreenRiverGatorz

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?

Was the question too tough for you?

I ignore most of your questions. Just be @guntlove blessed that I answered this particular one.

SFGbob

GreenRiverGatorz said:

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?

Was the question too tough for you?

I ignore most of your questions. Just be @guntlove blessed that I answered this particular one.

But you didn't answer it.

GreenRiverGatorz

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

SFGbob said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

Nobody should hold up the dems as the beacon of freedom and civil rights, but this attempt to rebrand the GOP as the true saviors of the black man and destroyers of racism is hilariously inept. But keep beating that drum, at least you have Candace Owens on board.

Which party was anti-slavery and which was pro-slavery?

Serious question (lol), do the GOP strategists think this is a persuasive argument that'll win over voters, or is this just another tactic to send libs into a frenzy and laugh at their overreaction?

Was the question too tough for you?

I ignore most of your questions. Just be @guntlove blessed that I answered this particular one.

But you didn't answer it.

You really got me cornered on this one.

Sledog

insinceredawg said:

Do you find it ironic that the "Party of Lincoln" is crying over the removal of Confederate monuments and names? Why does your party now support traitorous racists?

IC please don't send anymore selfies.