Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
I see a crowd chasing a car and attacking the occupant. Did his shirt hurt them with some message? Did he have a Trump hat or sticker on his car? Why is a bunch of people chasing him. We know commie mobs will beat, shoot and loot so why are they being aggressive toward this guy?
That's exactly what I see. And of course IC is lying his ass off. The guy slows down and stops and then is assaulted by the guy he shoots.
and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
Fucking liar. He comes to a complete stop and then he is assaulted.
Watch the video again dumbfuck. Around the 14 second mark, the guy he shoots is already running alongside the car trying to slow him down. Why are you such a liar Gay Bob?
Watch the video again. He has already stopped his car when the guy runs up and assaults him. You're a fucking liar IC.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
It's a great example of what a lying piece of shit IC is.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
No one said he was attacked for no reason you strawman ass fucking Kunt. But based upon what you can see from the videos your description of what happened is a fucking lie. But you're a fucking liar so that's hardly shocking.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.
How big of a lying asshole do you have to be to make this statement immediately after he just said: Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence
But as Doog already pointed out, you have your pre-existing narrative and it really doesn't matter what anyone here actually said. Fucking liar, moron and gullible dipshit. You're the triple threat IC.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.
One could crop the video at him be pulling out of the car, and that's 100% self defense. Point being, we don't know. Klukker trying to run over protestors (which absolutely happens), or someone who took a turn onto the wrong street (which absolutely happens). The video provided doesn't conclusively tell one or other.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.
How big of a lying asshole do you have to be to make this statement immediately after he just said: Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence
But as Doog already pointed out, you have your pre-existing narrative and it really doesn't matter what anyone here actually said. Fucking liar, moron and gullible dipshit. You're the triple threat IC.
hey dumbfuck, i was referring to this message from him. "Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense."
You can get off your knees and take doog bot's cock out of your mouth now.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Actually even if the guy in the car instigated something he backed down and left. He was being chased by the shootee and was then attacked by the shootee. The shootee had become the aggressor. Didn't look like he was making a citizens arrest................
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Actually even if the guy in the car instigated something he backed down and left. He was being chased by the shootee and was then attacked by the shootee. The shootee had become the aggressor. Didn't look like he was making a citizens arrest................
You see how fast that crowd of Antifa Betas turned and ran when they saw the gun?
Perhaps the Best Promotional AD for Gun Ownership I've ever seen.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.
The last refuge of someone shown to be a fucking dumbass. "Lol, I was just trolling"
Yeah, you really showed us by making yourself look like a fucking ignorant leftist dumbass that swallows their media instead of spitting.
This would be a good troll if you were a parody account pretending to be this stupid. Instead your just a real life parody of the Left.
Comments
IED planted in Santa Cruz - one officer dead.
Not a fucking word on the national news last night.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Nailed it.
But as Doog already pointed out, you have your pre-existing narrative and it really doesn't matter what anyone here actually said. Fucking liar, moron and gullible dipshit. You're the triple threat IC.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
"Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense."
You can get off your knees and take doog bot's cock out of your mouth now.
Perhaps the Best Promotional AD for Gun Ownership I've ever seen.
WHITE FLAG OF SURRENDER.
Yeah, you really showed us by making yourself look like a fucking ignorant leftist dumbass that swallows their media instead of spitting.
This would be a good troll if you were a parody account pretending to be this stupid. Instead your just a real life parody of the Left.