Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Esteemed PAC12 Savant Analyst Predicts 2020 UW to Go 8-4, Lose to Cal as Always
Comments
-
Oregon’s IOL and IDL should be a disaster. Especially the IOL gunna start a walk-on at center. 0 depth on the IDL. Popo is decent and so is Scott but you have no one else. Interested to see the Funa/Sewell dynamic on the edge.Mosster47 said:
Say, 34-17?chuck said:
Agree. Based on rosters alone Michigan is a toss up at home and Oregon should be a loss on the road. UW should be favored in every other game and should beat Cal and Utah rather easily. Anyone who says otherwise is basing on the equivalent of tarot card reading not an objective look at who will be on the field.haie said:
Meh the dooging is coming back when you look at who we're bringing back. Hearing they want to run power with Newton and not fuck around as much which will help Sirmon ease into the season. Probably lose in Euejeen and LA in conference. People forget predicting Cal to do anything with the culture on defense graduated is stupid. Predicting Utah to still be good is also stupid.RoadDawg55 said:Seems about right to me.
UW’s strength is on the DL. Don’t expect Oregon’s OL to be good outside of Sewell (incredible). Also will be interested to see the Cristo/Moorehead dynamic. -
With Sewell on the roster we got beat at home by some dude named Cyruth Haibaibai Likaiyo, so Sewell still being on their roster is all that matters. We're losing that game. I still might attend if I can be blacked out and among friends (I have none).backthepack said:
Oregon’s IOL and IDL should be a disaster. Especially the IOL gunna start a walk-on at center. 0 depth on the IDL. Popo is decent and so is Scott but you have no one else. Interested to see the Funa/Sewell dynamic on the edge.Mosster47 said:
Say, 34-17?chuck said:
Agree. Based on rosters alone Michigan is a toss up at home and Oregon should be a loss on the road. UW should be favored in every other game and should beat Cal and Utah rather easily. Anyone who says otherwise is basing on the equivalent of tarot card reading not an objective look at who will be on the field.haie said:
Meh the dooging is coming back when you look at who we're bringing back. Hearing they want to run power with Newton and not fuck around as much which will help Sirmon ease into the season. Probably lose in Euejeen and LA in conference. People forget predicting Cal to do anything with the culture on defense graduated is stupid. Predicting Utah to still be good is also stupid.RoadDawg55 said:Seems about right to me.
UW’s strength is on the DL. Don’t expect Oregon’s OL to be good outside of Sewell (incredible). Also will be interested to see the Cristo/Moorehead dynamic. -
We still probably lose. We should win though. We won’t. Losers lose. They own us.haie said:
With Sewell on the roster we got beat at home by some dude named Cyruth Haibaibai Likaiyo, so Sewell still being on their roster is all that matters. We're losing that game. I still might attend if I can be blacked out and among friends (I have none).backthepack said:
Oregon’s IOL and IDL should be a disaster. Especially the IOL gunna start a walk-on at center. 0 depth on the IDL. Popo is decent and so is Scott but you have no one else. Interested to see the Funa/Sewell dynamic on the edge.Mosster47 said:
Say, 34-17?chuck said:
Agree. Based on rosters alone Michigan is a toss up at home and Oregon should be a loss on the road. UW should be favored in every other game and should beat Cal and Utah rather easily. Anyone who says otherwise is basing on the equivalent of tarot card reading not an objective look at who will be on the field.haie said:
Meh the dooging is coming back when you look at who we're bringing back. Hearing they want to run power with Newton and not fuck around as much which will help Sirmon ease into the season. Probably lose in Euejeen and LA in conference. People forget predicting Cal to do anything with the culture on defense graduated is stupid. Predicting Utah to still be good is also stupid.RoadDawg55 said:Seems about right to me.
UW’s strength is on the DL. Don’t expect Oregon’s OL to be good outside of Sewell (incredible). Also will be interested to see the Cristo/Moorehead dynamic. -
They had Lemeiux and Throckmorton too who are pretty good. We lost because Pete went all shrivel dick. We had no depth on the IDL and we gased in the 2nd half. We were raping them for 3 quarters.haie said:
With Sewell on the roster we got beat at home by some dude named Cyruth Haibaibai Likaiyo, so Sewell still being on their roster is all that matters. We're losing that game. I still might attend if I can be blacked out and among friends (I have none).backthepack said:
Oregon’s IOL and IDL should be a disaster. Especially the IOL gunna start a walk-on at center. 0 depth on the IDL. Popo is decent and so is Scott but you have no one else. Interested to see the Funa/Sewell dynamic on the edge.Mosster47 said:
Say, 34-17?chuck said:
Agree. Based on rosters alone Michigan is a toss up at home and Oregon should be a loss on the road. UW should be favored in every other game and should beat Cal and Utah rather easily. Anyone who says otherwise is basing on the equivalent of tarot card reading not an objective look at who will be on the field.haie said:
Meh the dooging is coming back when you look at who we're bringing back. Hearing they want to run power with Newton and not fuck around as much which will help Sirmon ease into the season. Probably lose in Euejeen and LA in conference. People forget predicting Cal to do anything with the culture on defense graduated is stupid. Predicting Utah to still be good is also stupid.RoadDawg55 said:Seems about right to me.
UW’s strength is on the DL. Don’t expect Oregon’s OL to be good outside of Sewell (incredible). Also will be interested to see the Cristo/Moorehead dynamic.
-
Haven't checked the schedule but I don't even care about that game until we can beat Shaw's OKGs and Cal.backthepack said:
They had Lemeiux and Throckmorton too who are pretty good. We lost because Pete went all shrivel dick. We had no depth on the IDL and we gased in the 2nd half. We were raping them for 3 quarters.haie said:
With Sewell on the roster we got beat at home by some dude named Cyruth Haibaibai Likaiyo, so Sewell still being on their roster is all that matters. We're losing that game. I still might attend if I can be blacked out and among friends (I have none).backthepack said:
Oregon’s IOL and IDL should be a disaster. Especially the IOL gunna start a walk-on at center. 0 depth on the IDL. Popo is decent and so is Scott but you have no one else. Interested to see the Funa/Sewell dynamic on the edge.Mosster47 said:
Say, 34-17?chuck said:
Agree. Based on rosters alone Michigan is a toss up at home and Oregon should be a loss on the road. UW should be favored in every other game and should beat Cal and Utah rather easily. Anyone who says otherwise is basing on the equivalent of tarot card reading not an objective look at who will be on the field.haie said:
Meh the dooging is coming back when you look at who we're bringing back. Hearing they want to run power with Newton and not fuck around as much which will help Sirmon ease into the season. Probably lose in Euejeen and LA in conference. People forget predicting Cal to do anything with the culture on defense graduated is stupid. Predicting Utah to still be good is also stupid.RoadDawg55 said:Seems about right to me.
UW’s strength is on the DL. Don’t expect Oregon’s OL to be good outside of Sewell (incredible). Also will be interested to see the Cristo/Moorehead dynamic. -
Look at all this tardation all over my thread... can't a guy shitpost in peace?
-
backthepack said:
They had Lemeiux and Throckmorton too who are pretty good. We lost because Pete went all shrivel dick. We had no depth on the IDL and we gased in the 2nd half. We were raping them for 3 quarters.haie said:
With Sewell on the roster we got beat at home by some dude named Cyruth Haibaibai Likaiyo, so Sewell still being on their roster is all that matters. We're losing that game. I still might attend if I can be blacked out and among friends (I have none).backthepack said:
Oregon’s IOL and IDL should be a disaster. Especially the IOL gunna start a walk-on at center. 0 depth on the IDL. Popo is decent and so is Scott but you have no one else. Interested to see the Funa/Sewell dynamic on the edge.Mosster47 said:
Say, 34-17?chuck said:
Agree. Based on rosters alone Michigan is a toss up at home and Oregon should be a loss on the road. UW should be favored in every other game and should beat Cal and Utah rather easily. Anyone who says otherwise is basing on the equivalent of tarot card reading not an objective look at who will be on the field.haie said:
Meh the dooging is coming back when you look at who we're bringing back. Hearing they want to run power with Newton and not fuck around as much which will help Sirmon ease into the season. Probably lose in Euejeen and LA in conference. People forget predicting Cal to do anything with the culture on defense graduated is stupid. Predicting Utah to still be good is also stupid.RoadDawg55 said:Seems about right to me.
UW’s strength is on the DL. Don’t expect Oregon’s OL to be good outside of Sewell (incredible). Also will be interested to see the Cristo/Moorehead dynamic.
-
Oregon isn’t going to start a walk on at center. And didn’t lose any IDL depth from last year, they did pretty well against Wisconsin, far from a disaster.backthepack said:
Oregon’s IOL and IDL should be a disaster. Especially the IOL gunna start a walk-on at center. 0 depth on the IDL. Popo is decent and so is Scott but you have no one else. Interested to see the Funa/Sewell dynamic on the edge.Mosster47 said:
Say, 34-17?chuck said:
Agree. Based on rosters alone Michigan is a toss up at home and Oregon should be a loss on the road. UW should be favored in every other game and should beat Cal and Utah rather easily. Anyone who says otherwise is basing on the equivalent of tarot card reading not an objective look at who will be on the field.haie said:
Meh the dooging is coming back when you look at who we're bringing back. Hearing they want to run power with Newton and not fuck around as much which will help Sirmon ease into the season. Probably lose in Euejeen and LA in conference. People forget predicting Cal to do anything with the culture on defense graduated is stupid. Predicting Utah to still be good is also stupid.RoadDawg55 said:Seems about right to me.
UW’s strength is on the DL. Don’t expect Oregon’s OL to be good outside of Sewell (incredible). Also will be interested to see the Cristo/Moorehead dynamic.
Replacing dye will be the biggest issue on defense (when he was out last year we got absolutely torched by the opposing qb targeting his backup) and aside from a new q.b, you’re right that the 4 new OL starters are the biggest concern on offense -
Anthony Brown should be good in Moorehead’s system.ntxduck said:
Oregon isn’t going to start a walk on at center. And didn’t lose any IDL depth from last year, they did pretty well against Wisconsin, far from a disaster.backthepack said:
Oregon’s IOL and IDL should be a disaster. Especially the IOL gunna start a walk-on at center. 0 depth on the IDL. Popo is decent and so is Scott but you have no one else. Interested to see the Funa/Sewell dynamic on the edge.Mosster47 said:
Say, 34-17?chuck said:
Agree. Based on rosters alone Michigan is a toss up at home and Oregon should be a loss on the road. UW should be favored in every other game and should beat Cal and Utah rather easily. Anyone who says otherwise is basing on the equivalent of tarot card reading not an objective look at who will be on the field.haie said:
Meh the dooging is coming back when you look at who we're bringing back. Hearing they want to run power with Newton and not fuck around as much which will help Sirmon ease into the season. Probably lose in Euejeen and LA in conference. People forget predicting Cal to do anything with the culture on defense graduated is stupid. Predicting Utah to still be good is also stupid.RoadDawg55 said:Seems about right to me.
UW’s strength is on the DL. Don’t expect Oregon’s OL to be good outside of Sewell (incredible). Also will be interested to see the Cristo/Moorehead dynamic.
Replacing dye will be the biggest issue on defense (when he was out last year we got absolutely torched by the opposing qb targeting his backup) and aside from a new q.b, you’re right that the 4 new OL starters are the biggest concern on offense -
I would be shocked if he won the job over shoughbackthepack said:
Anthony Brown should be good in Moorehead’s system.ntxduck said:
Oregon isn’t going to start a walk on at center. And didn’t lose any IDL depth from last year, they did pretty well against Wisconsin, far from a disaster.backthepack said:
Oregon’s IOL and IDL should be a disaster. Especially the IOL gunna start a walk-on at center. 0 depth on the IDL. Popo is decent and so is Scott but you have no one else. Interested to see the Funa/Sewell dynamic on the edge.Mosster47 said:
Say, 34-17?chuck said:
Agree. Based on rosters alone Michigan is a toss up at home and Oregon should be a loss on the road. UW should be favored in every other game and should beat Cal and Utah rather easily. Anyone who says otherwise is basing on the equivalent of tarot card reading not an objective look at who will be on the field.haie said:
Meh the dooging is coming back when you look at who we're bringing back. Hearing they want to run power with Newton and not fuck around as much which will help Sirmon ease into the season. Probably lose in Euejeen and LA in conference. People forget predicting Cal to do anything with the culture on defense graduated is stupid. Predicting Utah to still be good is also stupid.RoadDawg55 said:Seems about right to me.
UW’s strength is on the DL. Don’t expect Oregon’s OL to be good outside of Sewell (incredible). Also will be interested to see the Cristo/Moorehead dynamic.
Replacing dye will be the biggest issue on defense (when he was out last year we got absolutely torched by the opposing qb targeting his backup) and aside from a new q.b, you’re right that the 4 new OL starters are the biggest concern on offense
