Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Not a parody

«1

Comments

  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    This Sanger talk should bring @HHusky out of his Captain COVID headquarters. Sanger is a hero to him.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    This Sanger talk should bring @HHusky out of his Captain COVID headquarters. Sanger is a hero to him.

    I love the "some internet quotes from Sanger are false, therefore all internet quotes from Sanger are false" defense.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    I'm all in on Planned Parenthood hypocrisy.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,079
    dnc said:

    I'm all in on Planned Parenthood hypocrisy.

    So am I. If the thesis that the black condition can best be explained by having children you're ready to raise, and don't intend to raise, then access to birth control and abortion are vital.

    Of course, and overhaul of the welfare system is also required, but that's another thread.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,332 Founders Club

    dnc said:

    I'm all in on Planned Parenthood hypocrisy.

    So am I. If the thesis that the black condition can best be explained by having children you're ready to raise, and don't intend to raise, then access to birth control and abortion are vital.

    Of course, and overhaul of the welfare system is also required, but that's another thread.
    A true philosopher king.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,977

    I remember when I was 18 and the late Sharon (aforementioned mother-figure to young Stalin) told me that Planned Parenthood was originally designed to eliminate the black population. At the time I thought she was nuts.
    And you were right.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    HHusky said:

    I remember when I was 18 and the late Sharon (aforementioned mother-figure to young Stalin) told me that Planned Parenthood was originally designed to eliminate the black population. At the time I thought she was nuts.
    And you were right.
    You may want to plead her case some more. She didn’t want “Negros” having kids, and Planned Parenthood went next-level with abortion.

  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    @HHusky ghosts whenever it’s brought up. He used to defend her so much on The Shed. Now he doesn’t even try. White Flag. My favorite was when Sanger spoke to the women’s KKK group and H said they should be able to know about birth control, too. Yeah, like that was the topic of discussion.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,977
    edited August 2020

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,977

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    @HHusky ghosts whenever it’s brought up. He used to defend her so much on The Shed. Now he doesn’t even try. White Flag. My favorite was when Sanger spoke to the women’s KKK group and H said they should be able to know about birth control, too. Yeah, like that was the topic of discussion.
    What did you and Margaret talk about?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,977

    HHusky said:

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
    She believed in less “Negro” reproduction and you still defend it. Because you, yourself, are a racist. Partly like its 1924. Ironing your hood for the next March, Grand Dragon Dipshit?
    Lying with half-truths. Very sophisticated, Boris.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
    She believed in less “Negro” reproduction and you still defend it. Because you, yourself, are a racist. Partly like its 1924. Ironing your hood for the next March, Grand Dragon Dipshit?
    Lying with half-truths. Very sophisticated, Boris.
    You have no idea how racist you are, do you? Misogynistic and xenophobic, too. You really are the worst of all systemic-racism attributes in one huge lumpy, lying package. Stick to copy/pasted, Fraud.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,047 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
    She was a blatant racist.

    What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
    She believed in less “Negro” reproduction and you still defend it. Because you, yourself, are a racist. Partly like its 1924. Ironing your hood for the next March, Grand Dragon Dipshit?
    Lying with half-truths. Very sophisticated, Boris.
    Do you admire Hitler too? FYI Hitler and company liked and used her book so she may be responsible in some way for the deaths of millions.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,977

    HHusky said:

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
    She was a blatant racist.

    What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc.
    The thesis here was that she believed in genocide. You gals really need to summon some facts.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
    She was a blatant racist.

    What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc.
    The thesis here was that she believed in genocide. You gals really need to summon some facts.
    Notice The Racist @HHusky doesn’t deny that Sanger was an advocate for eugenics targeted at “Negros.”

    Sickening.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
    She was a blatant racist.

    What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc.
    The thesis here was that she believed in genocide. You gals really need to summon some facts.
    She did. You need to read the shit she wrote.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,347 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    Come watch HHusky struggle in every thread.

  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,169
    Swaye said:

    Come watch HHusky struggle in every thread.

    Are you saying HETAR is the new SEBAR?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,977
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
    She was a blatant racist.

    What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc.
    The thesis here was that she believed in genocide. You gals really need to summon some facts.
    She did. You need to read the shit she wrote.
    For instance?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.

    She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.

    In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
    She was a blatant racist.

    What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc.
    The thesis here was that she believed in genocide. You gals really need to summon some facts.
    She did. You need to read the shit she wrote.
    For instance?
    She even presented at a Ku Klux Klan rally in 1926 in Silver Lake, N.J. She recounted this event in her autobiography: "I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan ... I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses ... I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak ... In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered" (Margaret Sanger, "An Autobiography," Page 366).

    In a letter to Clarence Gable in 1939, Sanger wrote: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members" (Margaret Sanger commenting on the 'Negro Project' in a letter to Gamble, Dec. 10, 1939).

    "The main objects of the Population Congress would be to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring[;] to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization." ("A Plan for Peace," 1932).

    "While I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble-minded, the insane and syphilitic, I have not been able to discover that these measures are more than superficial deterrents when applied to the constantly growing stream of the unfit. They are excellent means of meeting a certain phase of the situation, but I believe in regard to these, as in regard to other eugenic means, that they do not go to the bottom of the matter." ("Birth Control and Racial Betterment," Feb. 1919, The Birth Control Review).

    "The main objects of the Population Congress would be to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring[;] to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization." ("A Plan for Peace," 1932).

    30 seconds. You are a shitty fucking paralegal.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter

    “In April of 1933, The [Birth Control] Review [Margaret Sanger’s magazine], published a shocking article entitled “Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need”. It was written by Margaret’s close friend and advisor, Ernst Rudin, who was then serving as Hitler’s Director of Genetic Sterilization and had earlier taken a role in the establishment in the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene. Later in June of that same year, [The Birth Control Review] published an article by Leon Whitney entitled, “Selective Sterilization”, which adamantly praised and defended The Third Reich’s pre-holocaust race purification programs.”

    Sanger openly advocated for eugenics. In her book, “The Pivot of Civilization”, she says, “Eugenics suggests the reestablishment of the balance between the ‘fit’ and the ‘unfit.’ The birth-rate among the … finer stocks of humanity is to be increased by awakening among the ‘fit’ the realization of the dangers of a lessened birth-rate in proportion to the reckless breeding of the ‘unfit.’ (The Pivot of Civilization by Margaret Sanger, Ch. VIII, paragraph 12.) . From this type of writing, she became dubbed by the awareness concerning her advocacy, which hailed as “More children from the fit, less from the unfit.”

    "To give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation [concentration camps] or sterilization", advocated the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger in April 1932 ("A Plan For Peace", Birth Control Review; see 'appendix' for this full unabridged seminal article). Which country pioneered forced sterilization in the 20th century, Germany or the United States of America? The German program began in January 1934, but the U.S. state of Indiana passed a forced sterilization law (for mental defectives) in 1907 (when Adolf Hitler was 18 years old). Before the German program began, at least seventeen U.S. states (including California) had 'forced sterilization' laws. Before 1930 there were 200-600 forced sterilizations per year (in the U.S.A.) but in the 1930s the rate jumped to 2,000-4,000 per year. (1)

    Who 'Inspired' the architects of the German Sterilization law?

    "The leaders in the German sterilization movement state repeatedly that their legislation was formulated after careful study of the California experiment as reported by Mr. Gosney and Dr. [Paul] Popenoe. It would have been impossible, they say, to understake such a venture involving some 1 million people without drawing heavily upon previous experience elsewhere." (2) Who is Dr. Paul Popenoe? He was a leader in the U.S. eugenics movement and wrote (1933) the article 'Eugenic Sterilization' in the journal (BCR) that Margaret Sanger started. How many Americans did Dr. Popenoe estimate should be subjected to sterilization? Between five million and ten million Americans. "The situation [in the U.S.A] will grow worse instead of better if steps are not taken to control the reproduction of mentally handicapped. Eugenic sterilization represents one such step that is practicable, humanitarian, and certain in its results." (3)
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,977
    But again, Mall Cop, GENOCIDE was the claim. Sterilizing the unfit was mainstream US policy for decades. The “unfit” isn’t a race.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,977
    HHusky said:

    But again, Mall Cop, GENOCIDE was the claim. Sterilizing the unfit was mainstream US policy for decades. The “unfit” isn’t a race.

    And advocating contraception at a Klan women’s gathering isn’t exactly great proof of the desire to “exterminate the Negro”.