"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein
The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.
Did you buy that strawman dinner before the ass phucking began?
"We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus." -Dori Monson
I quote Dori for your ease of reference, Gasbag.
We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus. According to DOH data, 52% of the deaths are people 80 and older, and 38% are 60-79 years old. Without a more specific breakdown, the best estimate is that 85% of the deaths are people 72 and older.
We learned this week that the state may have artificially inflated the death count by as much as 13%. So that means the real number might be closer to 870 deaths, with only 130 of them being people under the age of 72. Almost all of them had other underlying health conditions.
So the state is lying? Where is your proof of large swaths? You're still on the clock
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein
The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.
Did you buy that strawman dinner before the ass phucking began?
"We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus." -Dori Monson
I quote Dori for your ease of reference, Gasbag.
We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus. According to DOH data, 52% of the deaths are people 80 and older, and 38% are 60-79 years old. Without a more specific breakdown, the best estimate is that 85% of the deaths are people 72 and older.
We learned this week that the state may have artificially inflated the death count by as much as 13%. So that means the real number might be closer to 870 deaths, with only 130 of them being people under the age of 72. Almost all of them had other underlying health conditions.
So the state is lying? Where is your proof of large swaths? You're still on the clock
The State said you need to die in order to be a "victim of coronavirus"?
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein
The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.
Did you buy that strawman dinner before the ass phucking began?
"We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus." -Dori Monson
I quote Dori for your ease of reference, Gasbag.
We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus. According to DOH data, 52% of the deaths are people 80 and older, and 38% are 60-79 years old. Without a more specific breakdown, the best estimate is that 85% of the deaths are people 72 and older.
We learned this week that the state may have artificially inflated the death count by as much as 13%. So that means the real number might be closer to 870 deaths, with only 130 of them being people under the age of 72. Almost all of them had other underlying health conditions.
So the state is lying? Where is your proof of large swaths? You're still on the clock
The State said you need to die in order to be a "victim of coronavirus"?
I'm gonna need a link.
Still on the clock H
Why don't you back you mouth up and then we can fly spec Dori's column
I'm not sure what your exact argument is counselor. How surprising is that. No one ever said, "The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take." The only simpleton that ever said that is you.
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein
The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.
Did you buy that strawman dinner before the ass phucking began?
"We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus." -Dori Monson
I quote Dori for your ease of reference, Gasbag.
We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus. According to DOH data, 52% of the deaths are people 80 and older, and 38% are 60-79 years old. Without a more specific breakdown, the best estimate is that 85% of the deaths are people 72 and older.
We learned this week that the state may have artificially inflated the death count by as much as 13%. So that means the real number might be closer to 870 deaths, with only 130 of them being people under the age of 72. Almost all of them had other underlying health conditions.
So the state is lying? Where is your proof of large swaths? You're still on the clock
The State said you need to die in order to be a "victim of coronavirus"?
I'm gonna need a link.
Still on the clock H
Why don't you back you mouth up and then we can fly spec Dori's column
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein
The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.
Did you buy that strawman dinner before the ass phucking began?
"We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus." -Dori Monson
I quote Dori for your ease of reference, Gasbag.
We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus. According to DOH data, 52% of the deaths are people 80 and older, and 38% are 60-79 years old. Without a more specific breakdown, the best estimate is that 85% of the deaths are people 72 and older.
We learned this week that the state may have artificially inflated the death count by as much as 13%. So that means the real number might be closer to 870 deaths, with only 130 of them being people under the age of 72. Almost all of them had other underlying health conditions.
So the state is lying? Where is your proof of large swaths? You're still on the clock
The State said you need to die in order to be a "victim of coronavirus"?
I'm gonna need a link.
Still on the clock H
Why don't you back you mouth up and then we can fly spec Dori's column
I quoted Dori saying it. That short term memory failure is what distinguishes you dementia patients.
That's not what he said
Its what you said as you continue to dodge and weave from backing your mouth up
"We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus."
I posted the whole quote while we are waiting for the wide swaths of suffering people you claimed
Back it up mouthy
So other than Americans with hypertension (100+ million), diabetes (roughly 26 million) or over 65 years of age (50+ million), no one is going to get very sick. Got it!
I’m a fairly neutral observer, but it really looks like HH is in over his head here. Can someone find him a forum he might be more “comfortable” posting in?
Comments
We learned this week that the state may have artificially inflated the death count by as much as 13%. So that means the real number might be closer to 870 deaths, with only 130 of them being people under the age of 72. Almost all of them had other underlying health conditions.
So the state is lying? Where is your proof of large swaths? You're still on the clock
I'm gonna need a link.
Why don't you back you mouth up and then we can fly spec Dori's column
Still no answer I see
As does everyone
Its what you said as you continue to dodge and weave from backing your mouth up
Back it up mouthy
He's that Dazzling
- Appeal to authority(wrongly) - It's Science! or when he and @BearsWiin pretend to know economics.
- Strawman and/or Appeal to ridicule - misrepresents another person's argument and then attacks/mocks the misrepresentation
- Ad hoc rescue - goalposts and revisionism
- Biased generalizing/cherrypicking -this evidence points to a trend bc it supports my belief but that evidence is irrelevant because it doesn't
Then when he gets desperate he runs the same gadget play.Ad hominem
Same shit, different threds.