Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dori: Gov. Inslee, it’s OK to admit you’ve been wrong

«13

Comments

  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,535 Founders Club
    He is just following science you Granny killer.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,582
    edited May 2020
    "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein

    The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,582

    HHusky said:

    "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein

    The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.

    "Your a fag"

    -Me
    So?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,496 Founders Club
    Large swaths of the population extremely ill?

    Where?
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    HHusky said:

    "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein

    The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.

    facts Trump theory

    Now that science has proven Covid isn’t that contagious and those most effected reside in the extremely elderly and infirm, how simpleton is it to keep kids locked down?

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,582

    Large swaths of the population extremely ill?

    Where?

    Only where there are middle-aged people.
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,582

    HHusky said:

    Large swaths of the population extremely ill?

    Where?

    Only where there are middle-aged people.
    Wrong on everything and lies when caught.
    If you didn't know middle aged people are much more likely to have severe symptoms, you really haven't been paying attention.
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited May 2020
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Large swaths of the population extremely ill?

    Where?

    Only where there are middle-aged people.
    Wrong on everything and lies when caught.
    If you didn't know middle aged people are much more likely to have severe symptoms, you really haven't been paying attention.
    Yes, they are stacking up like cordwood and hospitals are overrun here in Montana and other open states where bars and restaurants are open. What’s your purpose posting here other than being the driver of the Tug Clown Car? You’re either wrong or you’re lying. It’s the sign of a simpleton. HONK HONK!
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,765 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein

    The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.

    Christ. You may bust a half back out in motion once in a while but the wishbone is still the wishbone. Get over your damned self for fuck's sake, Dazzler. At least @BearsWiin has some street cred to be a pretend intellectual.

  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    I am quick to say when I am wrong. I was however right on this: There's been zero humility in our leadership.
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072

    Large swaths of the population extremely ill?

    Where?

    Large swaths of the population extremely ill?

    Where?

    New York and New Jersey nursing homes
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    edited May 2020
    HHusky said:

    "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein

    The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.

    https://www.doh.wa.gov/Emergencies/NovelCoronavirusOutbreak2020COVID19/DataDashboard


    16% of confirmed cases required hospitalization.

    https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/new-analysis-reveals-the-likely-coronavirus-infection-iceberg-in-king-county/
    Researchers say the number of confirmed cases in the county — about 6,300 as of Friday — represents the tip of a much larger iceberg. In reality, about 46,000 people have likely been infected since the local epidemic began, according to information released Friday by Public Health – Seattle & King County. That translates into about 2% of county residents.


    3215 / (18971 + (46000 - 7602)) = 5.4% hospitalization rate

    3215 / ((~7000000 * .02) - 18971) = 2.5% hospitalization rate
  • YouKnowItYouKnowIt Member Posts: 543

    Large swaths of the population extremely ill?

    Where?

    Obviously in Washington.... I mean look at the DOH stats for Middle Aged:

    Cases:18971 or 0.252946667% of Washington's population....(18971/7,500,000)

    40-59 year olds make up 34% which means 6450 or 0.086% of Washington's population (6450/7,500,000)

    Hospitalized: 3125 or 0.041666667% of Washington's population.... (3125/7,500,000)

    40-59 year olds make up 26% which means 812.5 or 0.010833333% of Washington's population (812.5/7,500,000)

    () for HH ...actual state population is 7.625
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,662 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein

    The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.

    Did you buy that strawman dinner before the ass phucking began?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,582

    HHusky said:

    "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein

    The argument that the only victims of a highly contagious illness that makes large swaths of the population extremely ill for weeks are 1,000 octogenerians is a simpleton's take. If he wants to say the consequences of opening back up are worth bearing, he could at least be honest about what those consequences are.

    Did you buy that strawman dinner before the ass phucking began?
    "We have roughly 1,000 people in our state who the Department of Health say are victims of coronavirus." -Dori Monson

    I quote Dori for your ease of reference, Gasbag.
Sign In or Register to comment.