Recruiting Reset
Comments
-
He's best friends with the best player in the country, well connected with a plethora of in state talent, and a well above average recruit.CallMeBigErn said:This really doesn't sound like anyone's problem but Simon's. He's not a can't-miss recruit and it shouldn't matter where our talent comes from, as long as we get that talent (which obviously remains to be seen). We just let a fellow local 4* LB walk to Virginia without offering. Why are we not clenching our teeth about that? We offered Simon a year ago and like FKA said, we only really need 1 inside backer. Shit or get off the pot, Julien.
I'm not for taking scrubs to help get their better frens and teammates.
Simon's not a scrub and would be in no way a waste of a schools.
Not getting him because you got outrecruited would be a major failure.
Not getting him because you didn't want him would be a major failure.
Get him. -
*schollydnc said:
He's best friends with the best player in the country, well connected with a plethora of in state talent, and a well above average recruit.CallMeBigErn said:This really doesn't sound like anyone's problem but Simon's. He's not a can't-miss recruit and it shouldn't matter where our talent comes from, as long as we get that talent (which obviously remains to be seen). We just let a fellow local 4* LB walk to Virginia without offering. Why are we not clenching our teeth about that? We offered Simon a year ago and like FKA said, we only really need 1 inside backer. Shit or get off the pot, Julien.
I'm not for taking scrubs to help get their better frens and teammates.
Simon's not a scrub and would be in no way a waste of a schools.
Not getting him because you got outrecruited would be a major failure.
Not getting him because you didn't want him would be a major failure.
Get him. -
*chin-statednc said:
*schollydnc said:
He's best friends with the best player in the country, well connected with a plethora of in state talent, and a well above average recruit.CallMeBigErn said:This really doesn't sound like anyone's problem but Simon's. He's not a can't-miss recruit and it shouldn't matter where our talent comes from, as long as we get that talent (which obviously remains to be seen). We just let a fellow local 4* LB walk to Virginia without offering. Why are we not clenching our teeth about that? We offered Simon a year ago and like FKA said, we only really need 1 inside backer. Shit or get off the pot, Julien.
I'm not for taking scrubs to help get their better frens and teammates.
Simon's not a scrub and would be in no way a waste of a schools.
Not getting him because you got outrecruited would be a major failure.
Not getting him because you didn't want him would be a major failure.
Get him. -
What would happen to our in state bumper crop if the Pac 12 doesn't play and the SEC and ACC do? Because I am pretty sure they will.
On the other side of that coin, Lane Kiffin said yesterday that a school loaded with blue chips like Bama might find the players not willing to play and will just wait for the draft. He's looking for and edge at Ol Miss
Either way Washington will lose so we have that going for us -
RaceBannon said:
What would happen to our in state bumper crop if the Pac 12 doesn't play and the SEC and ACC do? Because I am pretty sure they will.
On the other side of that coin, Lane Kiffin said yesterday that a school loaded with blue chips like Bama might find the players not willing to play and will just wait for the draft. He's looking for and edge at Ol Miss
Either way Washington will lose so we have that going for us
-
Agree to Disagree. Wasted scholarship as a RB. He's no Shaq or Jack.dnc said:I am not pro Bob at all but I have no problem recruiting Simon as a RB. He is quite capable at the position.
If he doesn't want to play RB that's fine and you adjust and get him here at LB. But they didn't fuck anything up by suggesting he could play RB. He absolutely could.
I like the player and a big part of the appeal is the instate influence. If he was out of state and we end up with better, fine. We won't. What about Bob? says we will? -
I don’t think he’s Shaq or Jack as a RB.Baseman said:
Agree to Disagree. Wasted scholarship as a RB. He's no Shaq or Jack.dnc said:I am not pro Bob at all but I have no problem recruiting Simon as a RB. He is quite capable at the position.
If he doesn't want to play RB that's fine and you adjust and get him here at LB. But they didn't fuck anything up by suggesting he could play RB. He absolutely could.
I like the player and a big part of the appeal is the instate influence. If he was out of state and we end up with better, fine. We won't. What about Bob? says we will?
I don’t think he’s Shaq or Jack as a LB either.
Those two were elite elite athletes. Jack is good.
He’s a step or two down from both which still makes him a guy you want. -
dnc said:
I don’t think he’s Shaq or Jack as a RB.Baseman said:
Agree to Disagree. Wasted scholarship as a RB. He's no Shaq or Jack.dnc said:I am not pro Bob at all but I have no problem recruiting Simon as a RB. He is quite capable at the position.
If he doesn't want to play RB that's fine and you adjust and get him here at LB. But they didn't fuck anything up by suggesting he could play RB. He absolutely could.
I like the player and a big part of the appeal is the instate influence. If he was out of state and we end up with better, fine. We won't. What about Bob? says we will?
I don’t think he’s Shaq or Jack as a LB either.
Those two were elite elite athletes. Jack is good.
He’s a step or two down from both which still makes him a guy you want.
-
Ah, so that is how they managed to fit so many people into a truck bed.GrundleStiltzkin said:dnc said:
I don’t think he’s Shaq or Jack as a RB.Baseman said:
Agree to Disagree. Wasted scholarship as a RB. He's no Shaq or Jack.dnc said:I am not pro Bob at all but I have no problem recruiting Simon as a RB. He is quite capable at the position.
If he doesn't want to play RB that's fine and you adjust and get him here at LB. But they didn't fuck anything up by suggesting he could play RB. He absolutely could.
I like the player and a big part of the appeal is the instate influence. If he was out of state and we end up with better, fine. We won't. What about Bob? says we will?
I don’t think he’s Shaq or Jack as a LB either.
Those two were elite elite athletes. Jack is good.
He’s a step or two down from both which still makes him a guy you want. -
YBPERatherBeBrewing said:
Ah, so that is how they managed to fit so many people into a truck bed.GrundleStiltzkin said:dnc said:
I don’t think he’s Shaq or Jack as a RB.Baseman said:
Agree to Disagree. Wasted scholarship as a RB. He's no Shaq or Jack.dnc said:I am not pro Bob at all but I have no problem recruiting Simon as a RB. He is quite capable at the position.
If he doesn't want to play RB that's fine and you adjust and get him here at LB. But they didn't fuck anything up by suggesting he could play RB. He absolutely could.
I like the player and a big part of the appeal is the instate influence. If he was out of state and we end up with better, fine. We won't. What about Bob? says we will?
I don’t think he’s Shaq or Jack as a LB either.
Those two were elite elite athletes. Jack is good.
He’s a step or two down from both which still makes him a guy you want.
You win the day.
