Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Nothing Burger

2»

Comments

  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,946
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    You sound like a Cuog crying about "if only it hadn't snowed, we'd have won", dazzler.
    I think my 100,000 number by the end of the year is looking pretty likely, though perhaps overly optimistic. Maybe you meant we’d have 5,000 dead if it hadn’t snowed?
    You still don't get the house setting the opening line. It's a maff thing, dazzler.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,276
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited April 2020

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    You sound like a Cuog crying about "if only it hadn't snowed, we'd have won", dazzler.
    I think my 100,000 number by the end of the year is looking pretty likely, though perhaps overly optimistic. Maybe you meant we’d have 5,000 dead if it hadn’t snowed?
    Good job, H. The reality is it won't matter how many die if the result of all of these measures is we plunge into a big depression. That will be far worse than 100,000 dead as it will literally affect everyone. This is why we have to take somewhat, or maybe not, risky steps to get the economy going. There are no absolutes. Everything is a tradeoff. Beware of anyone speaking in absolutes.

    State and Local authorities need to manage the reopening with precision and specificity driven by their local conditions. State level and US level mandates are what got us where we are. When this step happens, we will see the light at the end of the tunnel miles away.
    I pretty much agree with you. To have undergone this economic damage only to be forced to shut it all down again would REALLY be a disaster. The calculated course you describe is what we need, including calculated risks.
  • Options
    YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,044
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    You sound like a Cuog crying about "if only it hadn't snowed, we'd have won", dazzler.
    I think my 100,000 number by the end of the year is looking pretty likely, though perhaps overly optimistic. Maybe you meant we’d have 5,000 dead if it hadn’t snowed?
    You still don't get the house setting the opening line. It's a maff thing, dazzler.
    I never saw the new over and under from the Throbber Casino.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,946
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited April 2020

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    You sound like a Cuog crying about "if only it hadn't snowed, we'd have won", dazzler.
    I think my 100,000 number by the end of the year is looking pretty likely, though perhaps overly optimistic. Maybe you meant we’d have 5,000 dead if it hadn’t snowed?
    You still don't get the house setting the opening line. It's a maff thing, dazzler.
    I never saw the new over and under from the Throbber Casino.
    When it became apparent the scorekeepers are on the take, the house pulled the line.

    How many people normally die in a given year in the US?

    That's the unofficial line now.

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,276
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    You sound like a Cuog crying about "if only it hadn't snowed, we'd have won", dazzler.
    I think my 100,000 number by the end of the year is looking pretty likely, though perhaps overly optimistic. Maybe you meant we’d have 5,000 dead if it hadn’t snowed?
    Good job, H. The reality is it won't matter how many die if the result of all of these measures is we plunge into a big depression. That will be far worse than 100,000 dead as it will literally affect everyone. This is why we have to take somewhat, or maybe not, risky steps to get the economy going. There are no absolutes. Everything is a tradeoff. Beware of anyone speaking in absolutes.

    State and Local authorities need to manage the reopening with precision and specificity driven by their local conditions. State level and US level mandates are what got us where we are. When this step happens, we will see the light at the end of the tunnel miles away.
    I pretty much agree with you. To have undergone this economic damage only to be forced to shut it all down again would REALLY be a disaster. The calculated course you describe is what we need, including calculated risks.
    You are so gay
    And?
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    If I had my way we’d have 200,000 dead and 339,800,000 more not at risk of dying from poverty, suicide, cancer, heart attacks, and homicidal violence.
  • Options
    YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,044
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    If I had my way we’d have 200,000 dead and 339,800,000 more not at risk of dying from poverty, suicide, cancer, heart attacks, and homicidal violence.
    It’s a grim choice, but the morally acceptable option is obvious.
  • Options
    Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,606
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    If I had my way we’d have 200,000 dead and 339,800,000 more not at risk of dying from poverty, suicide, cancer, heart attacks, and homicidal violence.
    Privelege


    Showing
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 14,021
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter

    not to mention a healthcare system where insurance is tied to employment. 20 million lose their job, 20 million lose their health insurance. Yet nobody is proposing anything to fix that either.

    It's almost like the virus is exposing all of the problems that already existed.

    I disagree with the protesters, but if they are angry they have a right to be.

    Maybe it exposed the fallacy that big incompetent government was going to save us. Maybe it exposed us to the fact that sucking chicom dick was a problem. When you leftards hate America and Trump more than the chicoms, that is definitely a problem.
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    If I had my way we’d have 200,000 dead and 339,800,000 more not at risk of dying from poverty, suicide, cancer, heart attacks, and homicidal violence.
    It’s a grim choice, but the morally acceptable option is obvious.
    We make that choice daily and have as long as humans have existed.
  • Options
    doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    If I had my way we’d have 200,000 dead and 339,800,000 more not at risk of dying from poverty, suicide, cancer, heart attacks, and homicidal violence.
    Imagine a healthcare system suddenly freed of 200,000 who demand the most of the system. All those pre-existing conditions. All those FTE to care for the elderly and invalid.

    In this new age of telehealth, pharmacy/testing by amazon and outsourced surgery centers, think of productivity gains in health care on the way.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,946
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    doogie said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    If I had my way we’d have 200,000 dead and 339,800,000 more not at risk of dying from poverty, suicide, cancer, heart attacks, and homicidal violence.
    Imagine a healthcare system suddenly freed of 200,000 who demand the most of the system. All those pre-existing conditions. All those FTE to care for the elderly and invalid.

    In this new age of telehealth, pharmacy/testing by amazon and outsourced surgery centers, think of productivity gains in health care on the way.
    I hadn't quite put it in that context - but have at various times ranted about the ridiculous costs of end-of-life measures. Not necessarily rooting for 200,000 geezers to croak but it does prompt a lot of WTF do we do things the way we do coming out of this.

  • Options
    RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,300
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    You sound like a Cuog crying about "if only it hadn't snowed, we'd have won", dazzler.
    I think my 100,000 number by the end of the year is looking pretty likely, though perhaps overly optimistic. Maybe you meant we’d have 5,000 dead if it hadn’t snowed?
    Good job, H. The reality is it won't matter how many die if the result of all of these measures is we plunge into a big depression. That will be far worse than 100,000 dead as it will literally affect everyone. This is why we have to take somewhat, or maybe not, risky steps to get the economy going. There are no absolutes. Everything is a tradeoff. Beware of anyone speaking in absolutes.

    State and Local authorities need to manage the reopening with precision and specificity driven by their local conditions. State level and US level mandates are what got us where we are. When this step happens, we will see the light at the end of the tunnel miles away.
    I pretty much agree with you. To have undergone this economic damage only to be forced to shut it all down again would REALLY be a disaster. The calculated course you describe is what we need, including calculated risks.
    You are so gay
    Stop plagiarizing my shit fucco
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,751
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    While there are 800,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States — that’s 0.24 percent of the U.S. population — former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb has noted that anywhere between 1 percent and 5 percent of Americans may have actually already been infected with the virus. But that’s far short of the 50 percent to 70 percent required to achieve herd immunity. The seasonal flu, by contrast, infected 12 percent of the American population last year because we have a flu vaccine and some more immunity from previous infections.

    So weº sit here in isolation, at a 45 points below what's required for herd immunity, with no vaccine in sight, going broke until the food runs out.
    There's a list of essential services. Food production is on it.
    It's not working


    Millions out of work because you're a pussy still clinging to bad math

    2 million dead!

    200,000 dead!

    Fuck off
    We'd easily hit 200,000 dead if you had your way. As it is, if deaths don't decline pretty damn soon, we'll hit that optimistic 60,000 figure by May 1.
    You sound like a Cuog crying about "if only it hadn't snowed, we'd have won", dazzler.
    I think my 100,000 number by the end of the year is looking pretty likely, though perhaps overly optimistic. Maybe you meant we’d have 5,000 dead if it hadn’t snowed?
    Good job, H. The reality is it won't matter how many die if the result of all of these measures is we plunge into a big depression. That will be far worse than 100,000 dead as it will literally affect everyone. This is why we have to take somewhat, or maybe not, risky steps to get the economy going. There are no absolutes. Everything is a tradeoff. Beware of anyone speaking in absolutes.

    State and Local authorities need to manage the reopening with precision and specificity driven by their local conditions. State level and US level mandates are what got us where we are. When this step happens, we will see the light at the end of the tunnel miles away.
    I pretty much agree with you. To have undergone this economic damage only to be forced to shut it all down again would REALLY be a disaster. The calculated course you describe is what we need, including calculated risks.
    Sounds like you're really, really worried about the 2nd wave.
Sign In or Register to comment.