Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Anyone else old enough to remember when some asshole was claiming Tom Cotton...

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
in Tug Tavern
was pushing a right-wing conspiracy theory when he claimed the virus could have come from a Chinese lab?

US officials were reportedly concerned that safety breaches at a Wuhan lab studying coronavirus in bats could cause a pandemic

https://www.businessinsider.com/us-officials-raised-alarms-about-safety-issues-in-wuhan-lab-report-2020-4
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • georgiaduck
    georgiaduck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,739 Swaye's Wigwam
    So the lab was flagged for possible safety violations
    They were studying coronavirus in animals
    Lab located in the city that is the epicenter of the outbreak.

    Seems clear to me. You're a racist.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    georgiaduck said:

    So the lab was flagged for possible safety violations
    They were studying coronavirus in animals
    Lab located in the city that is the epicenter of the outbreak.

    Seems clear to me. You're a racist.

    And a right wing conspiracy theorist, just like that right wing rag the Washington Post.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2020/04/14/the-washington-post-goes-rogue-china-lab-in-focus-of-coronavirus-outbreak/#5e9c19c81ee1

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

    Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,486 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

    Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

    Kenny Easley, HELP!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PandaOrangeChiknDuck
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck Member Posts: 545
    HHusky said:

    Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

    Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

    It doesn't matter for what purpose, the virus still came from them, and by not following proper procedures, they created a global pandemic. I think you give China two choices: Forgive some foreign debt as compensation for causing the global economic collapse, or economic sanction the fuck out of them.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

    Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

    Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

    Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

    Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

    Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

    Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
    He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited April 2020
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

    Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

    Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

    Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
    He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.
    Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

    So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

    And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

    Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

    Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

    Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
    He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.
    Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

    So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

    And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
    Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.

    I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.

    I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

    Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

    Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

    Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.
    He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.
    Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

    So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

    And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.
    Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.

    I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.

    I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.
    Do you mean like the way "science" said that it couldn't be transmitted from human to human and that it came from a Chinese meat market? Science!!!

    Since you're too big a pathological lying piece of shit to quote Cotton here it is.




    Wow, look at the way he "promoted" that theory.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter