We have complied unquestioningly with the single most extreme public policy crisis-response in our nation's history.
The USA has seen * civil war * two world wars * nuclear threat * previous, more deadly epidemics * countless natural disasters
We have never engaged a more damaging, more costly nor more universally-destructive an application of government force in our history.
Yet we've made it "impolitic" to even ask questions about the benefit and downrange costs of such suppressive force.
Anyone who believes that the collapse of social order doesn't follow economic collapse hasn't read much history.
And anyone who still believes, after this demonstration of bovine complacency, that government-induced economic collapse "can't happen here" is living in blind denial.
We have complied unquestioningly with the single most extreme public policy crisis-response in our nation's history.
The USA has seen * civil war * two world wars * nuclear threat * previous, more deadly epidemics * countless natural disasters
We have never engaged a more damaging, more costly nor more universally-destructive an application of government force in our history.
Yet we've made it "impolitic" to even ask questions about the benefit and downrange costs of such suppressive force.
Anyone who believes that the collapse of social order doesn't follow economic collapse hasn't read much history.
And anyone who still believes, after this demonstration of bovine complacency, that government-induced economic collapse "can't happen here" is living in blind denial.
But hey, dazzler says it's just common sense.
Your desire to see this become the most deadly pandemic in our history is not shared by normal people.
We have complied unquestioningly with the single most extreme public policy crisis-response in our nation's history.
The USA has seen * civil war * two world wars * nuclear threat * previous, more deadly epidemics * countless natural disasters
We have never engaged a more damaging, more costly nor more universally-destructive an application of government force in our history.
Yet we've made it "impolitic" to even ask questions about the benefit and downrange costs of such suppressive force.
Anyone who believes that the collapse of social order doesn't follow economic collapse hasn't read much history.
And anyone who still believes, after this demonstration of bovine complacency, that government-induced economic collapse "can't happen here" is living in blind denial.
But hey, dazzler says it's just common sense.
Your desire to see this become the most deadly pandemic in our history is not shared by normal people.
We have complied unquestioningly with the single most extreme public policy crisis-response in our nation's history.
The USA has seen * civil war * two world wars * nuclear threat * previous, more deadly epidemics * countless natural disasters
We have never engaged a more damaging, more costly nor more universally-destructive an application of government force in our history.
Yet we've made it "impolitic" to even ask questions about the benefit and downrange costs of such suppressive force.
Anyone who believes that the collapse of social order doesn't follow economic collapse hasn't read much history.
And anyone who still believes, after this demonstration of bovine complacency, that government-induced economic collapse "can't happen here" is living in blind denial.
But hey, dazzler says it's just common sense.
Your desire to see this become the most deadly pandemic in our history is not shared by normal people.
How many millions of job losses are acceptable to save 100,000 lives?
Biden says not one life if worth losing to help the economy. Zero is the bar.
“Let me be very clear: No one is expendable. No matter your age, race, gender, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or disability. No life is worth losing to add one more point to the Dow.”
We've got one of my bosses regular bartenders putting in orders for our mask company
How many millions of job losses are acceptable to save 100,000 lives?
Where do you get the idea that "only" an extra 100,000 people will die if we just operate normally?
Where do you get the idea that they won't?
You want to shut it down again you need to prove it. Not theorize about it
Every model I've seen says millions of deaths if we do nothing. I know you guys hate expertise.
Because everyone is going to run around coughing and sneezing and hocking loogeys on their fellow man. And shit in their hands and wipe it on their neighbors face. Then run around fornicating their body fluids into farm animals so it infects the food supply.
Jesus fuck, dazzler. Do you live in the same universe as the rest of us?
Don't answer that. I already know the answer, komrad.
We have complied unquestioningly with the single most extreme public policy crisis-response in our nation's history.
The USA has seen * civil war * two world wars * nuclear threat * previous, more deadly epidemics * countless natural disasters
We have never engaged a more damaging, more costly nor more universally-destructive an application of government force in our history.
Yet we've made it "impolitic" to even ask questions about the benefit and downrange costs of such suppressive force.
Anyone who believes that the collapse of social order doesn't follow economic collapse hasn't read much history.
And anyone who still believes, after this demonstration of bovine complacency, that government-induced economic collapse "can't happen here" is living in blind denial.
This is a hard money lender. Freedom takes another hit
Actually if the interior is dated and the State is gonna pay you to house some homeless and offers liability protection for damages done. It may be a great way to have Race's boys come over and remodel your house for free when the dust settles..
This is a hard money lender. Freedom takes another hit
Actually if the interior is dated and the State is gonna pay you to house some homeless and offers liability protection for damages done. It may be a great way to have Race's boys come over and remodel your house for free when the dust settles..
Throbber life lessons: always make sure the carpet matches the drapes.
How many millions of job losses are acceptable to save 100,000 lives?
Where do you get the idea that "only" an extra 100,000 people will die if we just operate normally?
Where do you get the idea that they won't?
You want to shut it down again you need to prove it. Not theorize about it
Every model I've seen says millions of deaths if we do nothing. I know you guys hate expertise.
Awesome thanks for the update
So we shut down every winter because models.
What expertise?
Epidemiological expertise.
Literally everything you have posted is misunderstood and over your head, despite it's MSNBC Kindergarten-level analysis. But it's your self-destruction and humiliation, so keep rooting for the away team, dumbass.
Comments
Unless you said there would be irrational panic. Which you didn't.
Race and I did. And we nailed it as usual.
JFC.
Fuck off.
We have complied unquestioningly with the single most extreme public policy crisis-response in our nation's history.
The USA has seen
* civil war
* two world wars
* nuclear threat
* previous, more deadly epidemics
* countless natural disasters
We have never engaged a more damaging, more costly nor more universally-destructive an application of government force in our history.
Yet we've made it "impolitic" to even ask questions about the benefit and downrange costs of such suppressive force.
Anyone who believes that the collapse of social order doesn't follow economic collapse hasn't read much history.
And anyone who still believes, after this demonstration of bovine complacency, that government-induced economic collapse "can't happen here" is living in blind denial.
But hey, dazzler says it's just common sense.
Thanks for reinforcing my point.
Go fuck yourself
Jesus fuck, dazzler. Do you live in the same universe as the rest of us?
Don't answer that. I already know the answer, komrad.
HondoFS started way back when too.
“ I can’t breathe”
What if I refuse to pay?
In a breakdown of society, fuck your fine.