And I agree the US should be testing more people. But comparing percentages to significantly smaller nations where it hit significantly sooner is not done as a serious study but to simply try and prove a point. Especially when you only report on 10% of China.
What happens if you test positive? You get the vaccine that doesn't exist? Your friend should stay home without having to be told to by the National Guard. Common Sense isn't just a revolutionary pamphlet
If there was no cornonabeervirus you should stay home when you are sick
People go to work because they need money. Go figure. Back in the tuff logger days it was a badge of honor to show up sick and infect everyone
And I agree the US should be testing more people. But comparing percentages to significantly smaller nations where it hit significantly sooner is not done as a serious study but to simply try and prove a point. Especially when you only report on 10% of China.
The US recorded its first case in January. It was one of the first outside of China.
Comments
What a bullshit graphic.
If there was no cornonabeervirus you should stay home when you are sick
People go to work because they need money. Go figure. Back in the tuff logger days it was a badge of honor to show up sick and infect everyone
But they fucking test man
/s
That would be a much more accurate and effective graphic. Isolating Guangdong just makes it look like there's an agenda.
First paragraph:
If you want to trust them go ahead
You already are panicking
I mean...post her lung x-ray.