So, Tosh has character issues? Of course Sark had no idea. Actually, I believe Sark here. He was quite ignorant about a lot of things going on with football operations.
So, Tosh has character issues? Of course Sark had no idea. Actually, I believe Sark here. He was quite ignorant about a lot of things going on with football operations.
On Feb. 25, Davis said, Lupoi called him and suggested they meet for a meal at the Ram Restaurant & Brewery at the Northgate Mall in Seattle. During the meeting, Davis said that he got up from the table to go to the restroom and that Lupoi followed.
"He said, 'When you go back, there's a bag there that's yours,'" Davis said.
When he returned to the booth, Davis said he found a brown paper bag tucked into the booth. He said they talked about football and Basham and then shook hands and left.
Davis said he did not look in the bag, but when he returned home his stepdaughter Brooke opened it and counted $3,000 in $100 bills.
Davis' bank statement shows that on Feb. 26, the next day, he deposited $3,000. It also shows a Feb. 27 transfer of $3,000 to his checking account and a March 1 check card charge of $2,999 for "Kaplan-Precollege."
Sark should get into politics. He is good at not taking responsibility and deflecting.
> Asked if a head coach was responsible for everything in his program, Sarkisian said, "You do everything in your power to be proactive, to promote a compliant atmosphere.… I don't have the power to see everything, hear everything and know everything, but … I do take responsibility for that, to promote that atmosphere." >
If Haden means what he says, he should fire Sark ASAP:
Head coaches in football and basketball will be held directly accountable for NCAA rules violations by members of their coaching staff in radically new legislation that is expected to be adopted Tuesday by the Division 1 Board of Directors, according to a document obtained by USA TODAY Sports.
The nine-page document outlines some specifics in the NCAA's new four-tier penalty structure, which would take effect immediately and replace the current rigid categories of secondary and major violations, and addresses several kinds of violations in football and men's basketball that can lead to the suspension of a head coach.
One example the document alludes to is the University of Connecticut basketball violations involving the recruitment of Nate Miles, in which head coach Jim Calhoun "failed to alert the compliance staff and administration of possible improprieties between the agent/booster" and prospect. Under the new structure, penalties could have included a suspension or other restrictions for Calhoun.
And the primary message for head coaches is that ignorance will no longer be acceptable as a defense.
The document reads, "A head coach is presumed responsible for major/Level I and Level II violations (e.g. academic fraud, recruiting inducements) occurring within his or her program unless the coach can show that he or she promoted an atmosphere of compliance and monitored his or her staff."
Any coach who is found responsible for the most serious violations under those guidelines will be subject to an entire-season suspension, according to the document.
The new guidelines also state that beginning Aug. 1, 2013, men's basketball coaches can be suspended for violations ranging from illegal contact with recruits, giving team gear to prospects or impermissible benefits given by third parties if the coach knows the third party has a relationship with the recruit.
Football coaches can face suspension for violations such as holding 7-on-7 on campus or providing written scholarship offers before Aug. 1 of a prospect's senior year.
In both cases, the head coach could be suspended for violations committed by his assistants.
"It's a tougher penalty structure, there's no doubt about it," Southern California athletic director Pat Haden said in an interview conducted prior to USA TODAY Sports' acquisition of the document. "The point is, for head coaches -- and this goes for any sport -- you have this responsibility. You need to be constantly vigilant and you need to be constantly coaching your coaches about how important it is to play by the rules."
Haden is a member of the 20-person working group that forwarded the proposal to the NCAA Board of Directors.
I wonder if the UW could get in trouble over this...seems like a pretty damn bad recruiting violation and we're talking stacks of $100s and a lot of evidence. THE HAMMER IS COMING DOWN.
Comments
Gets a fucking recruiter and still can't qualify?
>
Asked if a head coach was responsible for everything in his program, Sarkisian said, "You do everything in your power to be proactive, to promote a compliant atmosphere.… I don't have the power to see everything, hear everything and know everything, but … I do take responsibility for that, to promote that atmosphere."
>
Sark should be fucking sweating ...
Head coaches in football and basketball will be held directly accountable for NCAA rules violations by members of their coaching staff in radically new legislation that is expected to be adopted Tuesday by the Division 1 Board of Directors, according to a document obtained by USA TODAY Sports.
The nine-page document outlines some specifics in the NCAA's new four-tier penalty structure, which would take effect immediately and replace the current rigid categories of secondary and major violations, and addresses several kinds of violations in football and men's basketball that can lead to the suspension of a head coach.
One example the document alludes to is the University of Connecticut basketball violations involving the recruitment of Nate Miles, in which head coach Jim Calhoun "failed to alert the compliance staff and administration of possible improprieties between the agent/booster" and prospect. Under the new structure, penalties could have included a suspension or other restrictions for Calhoun.
And the primary message for head coaches is that ignorance will no longer be acceptable as a defense.
The document reads, "A head coach is presumed responsible for major/Level I and Level II violations (e.g. academic fraud, recruiting inducements) occurring within his or her program unless the coach can show that he or she promoted an atmosphere of compliance and monitored his or her staff."
Any coach who is found responsible for the most serious violations under those guidelines will be subject to an entire-season suspension, according to the document.
The new guidelines also state that beginning Aug. 1, 2013, men's basketball coaches can be suspended for violations ranging from illegal contact with recruits, giving team gear to prospects or impermissible benefits given by third parties if the coach knows the third party has a relationship with the recruit.
Football coaches can face suspension for violations such as holding 7-on-7 on campus or providing written scholarship offers before Aug. 1 of a prospect's senior year.
In both cases, the head coach could be suspended for violations committed by his assistants.
"It's a tougher penalty structure, there's no doubt about it," Southern California athletic director Pat Haden said in an interview conducted prior to USA TODAY Sports' acquisition of the document. "The point is, for head coaches -- and this goes for any sport -- you have this responsibility. You need to be constantly vigilant and you need to be constantly coaching your coaches about how important it is to play by the rules."
Haden is a member of the 20-person working group that forwarded the proposal to the NCAA Board of Directors.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2012/10/25/ncaa-penalty-enforcement-document-board-of-directors/1659413/
Could this impact Sark at USC?
Does the buck stop with Sark or with Woodward?
UW can avoid the hammer by saying they were going to fire Sark and Tosh anyway and that Tosh is recruiting for USC now.
which of course means the HAMMER is coming.