There was until you showed up and dropped the average to four. I’m here now so we’re back up to five. You’re welcome.
I like the .40 as a capacity/knockdown compromise between the 9mm and .45. 10mm is good but I’m way too invested in the aforementioned calibers (and I don’t have that sweet Orkin money to throw around).
There was until you showed up and dropped the average to four. I’m here now so we’re back up to five. You’re welcome.
I like the .40 as a capacity/knockdown compromise between the 9mm and .45. 10mm is good but I’m way too invested in the aforementioned calibers (and I don’t have that sweet Orkin money to throw around).
There was until you showed up and dropped the average to four. I’m here now so we’re back up to five. You’re welcome.
I like the .40 as a capacity/knockdown compromise between the 9mm and .45. 10mm is good but I’m way too invested in the aforementioned calibers (and I don’t have that sweet Orkin money to throw around).
Good defense ammo in .40 edges .45 for energy and terminal performance. It's often called a compromise, and it is in terms of capacity, but it is not a performance compromise. It beats both.
Comments
I like the .40 as a capacity/knockdown compromise between the 9mm and .45. 10mm is good but I’m way too invested in the aforementioned calibers (and I don’t have that sweet Orkin money to throw around).