No one is coming after your gas powered vehicle
Comments
-
Shit like this makes me want to burn a truck tire in my front yard. Agree with @YellowSnow the free market will sort it out. Alternative energy solutions will be in abundance when we're done burning dinosaur blood. Until then, ain't nuttin' better.
-
It’s not a law. But still.RaceBannon said:(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all
7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles
8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be
electric vehicles.
There’s a whole song about how this works... -
Ok they are just trying to make it a lawThomasFremont said:
It’s not a law. But still.RaceBannon said:(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all
7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles
8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be
electric vehicles.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
its just a bill working its way through the legislature.
Should we be concerned about it after it passes or can we go ahead and argue against it before it does?
-
Christ. Take the L Thomas and move the fuck on.ThomasFremont said:
It’s not a law. But still.RaceBannon said:(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all
7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles
8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be
electric vehicles.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
The title of the OP recognizes it's a bill.
Normally i'd dismiss this as something that has zero chance. Given the make up if the state legislature and the governor I'm not so sure. -
Need to pass it to find out what's in it.RaceBannon said:
Ok they are just trying to make it a lawThomasFremont said:
It’s not a law. But still.RaceBannon said:(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all
7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles
8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be
electric vehicles.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
its just a bill working its way through the legislature.
Should we be concerned about it after it passes or can we go ahead and argue against it before it does? -
It seems to be a common refrain among the left. Propose something stupid then say hey it probably won't pass anyway!!!!!11111!!!!!
-
Your concern is noted. I’m sure a bill in the earliest stage of the process will have dire effect on you in CA.RaceBannon said:
Ok they are just trying to make it a lawThomasFremont said:
It’s not a law. But still.RaceBannon said:(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all
7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles
8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be
electric vehicles.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
its just a bill working its way through the legislature.
Should we be concerned about it after it passes or can we go ahead and argue against it before it does? -
It has zero chance. HTHMikeDamone said:
Christ. Take the L Thomas and move the fuck on.ThomasFremont said:
It’s not a law. But still.RaceBannon said:(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all
7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles
8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be
electric vehicles.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
The title of the OP recognizes it's a bill.
Normally i'd dismiss this as something that has zero chance. Given the make up if the state legislature and the governor I'm not so sure. -
See?ThomasFremont said:
It has zero chance. HTHMikeDamone said:
Christ. Take the L Thomas and move the fuck on.ThomasFremont said:
It’s not a law. But still.RaceBannon said:(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all
7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles
8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be
electric vehicles.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
The title of the OP recognizes it's a bill.
Normally i'd dismiss this as something that has zero chance. Given the make up if the state legislature and the governor I'm not so sure. -
I'm not sure why being concerned about attacks on our freedom by elected politicians seems to concern some people. This isn't some nut cases on Twitter, these are elected politicians. Hell, the governor of Washington wants this sh*t. The Oregon legislature is aching to pass a cap and trade bill that is equivalent to a 22 cents a gallon gas tax. You think the low information dem voter actually want this? That's why it isn't a tax. It's called cap and trade and is sold as a pain free way to do "something" for the planet. Race and 38 million Californians are already paying that tax. Has that cooled the earth yet? Phu*cking stupid ideas shouldn't be ignored, they should be exposed and ridiculed.
