Shit like this makes me want to burn a truck tire in my front yard. Agree with @YellowSnow the free market will sort it out. Alternative energy solutions will be in abundance when we're done burning dinosaur blood. Until then, ain't nuttin' better.
(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all 7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles 8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be electric vehicles.
(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all 7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles 8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be electric vehicles.
It’s not a law. But still.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
Ok they are just trying to make it a law
its just a bill working its way through the legislature.
Should we be concerned about it after it passes or can we go ahead and argue against it before it does?
(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all 7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles 8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be electric vehicles.
It’s not a law. But still.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
Christ. Take the L Thomas and move the fuck on.
The title of the OP recognizes it's a bill.
Normally i'd dismiss this as something that has zero chance. Given the make up if the state legislature and the governor I'm not so sure.
(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all 7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles 8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be electric vehicles.
It’s not a law. But still.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
Ok they are just trying to make it a law
its just a bill working its way through the legislature.
Should we be concerned about it after it passes or can we go ahead and argue against it before it does?
(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all 7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles 8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be electric vehicles.
It’s not a law. But still.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
Ok they are just trying to make it a law
its just a bill working its way through the legislature.
Should we be concerned about it after it passes or can we go ahead and argue against it before it does?
Your concern is noted. I’m sure a bill in the earliest stage of the process will have dire effect on you in CA.
(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all 7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles 8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be electric vehicles.
It’s not a law. But still.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
Christ. Take the L Thomas and move the fuck on.
The title of the OP recognizes it's a bill.
Normally i'd dismiss this as something that has zero chance. Given the make up if the state legislature and the governor I'm not so sure.
(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all 7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles 8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be electric vehicles.
It’s not a law. But still.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
Christ. Take the L Thomas and move the fuck on.
The title of the OP recognizes it's a bill.
Normally i'd dismiss this as something that has zero chance. Given the make up if the state legislature and the governor I'm not so sure.
I'm not sure why being concerned about attacks on our freedom by elected politicians seems to concern some people. This isn't some nut cases on Twitter, these are elected politicians. Hell, the governor of Washington wants this sh*t. The Oregon legislature is aching to pass a cap and trade bill that is equivalent to a 22 cents a gallon gas tax. You think the low information dem voter actually want this? That's why it isn't a tax. It's called cap and trade and is sold as a pain free way to do "something" for the planet. Race and 38 million Californians are already paying that tax. Has that cooled the earth yet? Phu*cking stupid ideas shouldn't be ignored, they should be exposed and ridiculed.
(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all 7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles 8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be electric vehicles.
It’s not a law. But still.
There’s a whole song about how this works...
Christ. Take the L Thomas and move the fuck on.
The title of the OP recognizes it's a bill.
Normally i'd dismiss this as something that has zero chance. Given the make up if the state legislature and the governor I'm not so sure.
I'm not sure why being concerned about attacks on our freedom by elected politicians seems to concern some people. This isn't some nut cases on Twitter, these are elected politicians. Hell, the governor of Washington wants this sh*t. The Oregon legislature is aching to pass a cap and trade bill that is equivalent to a 22 cents a gallon gas tax. You think the low information dem voter actually want this? That's why it isn't a tax. It's called cap and trade and is sold as a pain free way to do "something" for the planet. Race and 38 million Californians are already paying that tax. Has that cooled the earth yet? Phu*cking stupid ideas shouldn't be ignored, they should be exposed and ridiculed.
Look what Kali does with it's gas tax. It isn't building roads....
(1) "2030 requirement" refers to the requirement that all 7 privately owned and publicly owned passenger and light duty vehicles 8 of model year 2030 or later sold or registered in Washington state be electric vehicles.
Yeah, but name one other person.
One other person in a position of power, who will win the election and become President.
I'm not sure why being concerned about attacks on our freedom by elected politicians seems to concern some people. This isn't some nut cases on Twitter, these are elected politicians. Hell, the governor of Washington wants this sh*t. The Oregon legislature is aching to pass a cap and trade bill that is equivalent to a 22 cents a gallon gas tax. You think the low information dem voter actually want this? That's why it isn't a tax. It's called cap and trade and is sold as a pain free way to do "something" for the planet. Race and 38 million Californians are already paying that tax. Has that cooled the earth yet? Phu*cking stupid ideas shouldn't be ignored, they should be exposed and ridiculed.
Look what Kali does with it's gas tax. It isn't building roads....
As usual, they sold the recent tax increase on fuel as a measure to fix our "unsafe" roads. The stupid voters of this state never even bothered to ask where all the money the state was currently getting from what at the time was a state tax on fuel that put California in the top 10 of all states. Now with the increase we're firmly number one in taxes on fuel, and after the tax increased was passed, the state government was forced to reveal that the increase didn't have to be used to fix the roads.
We now have the highest taxes on fuel and one of the highest annual vehicle registration fees in the Country, and most of the money from those goes right into the general fund.
I'm not sure why being concerned about attacks on our freedom by elected politicians seems to concern some people. This isn't some nut cases on Twitter, these are elected politicians. Hell, the governor of Washington wants this sh*t. The Oregon legislature is aching to pass a cap and trade bill that is equivalent to a 22 cents a gallon gas tax. You think the low information dem voter actually want this? That's why it isn't a tax. It's called cap and trade and is sold as a pain free way to do "something" for the planet. Race and 38 million Californians are already paying that tax. Has that cooled the earth yet? Phu*cking stupid ideas shouldn't be ignored, they should be exposed and ridiculed.
Look what Kali does with it's gas tax. It isn't building roads....
As usual, they sold the recent tax increase on fuel as a measure to fix our "unsafe" roads. The stupid voters of this state never even bothered to ask where all the money the state was currently getting from what at the time was a state tax on fuel that put California in the top 10 of all states. Now with the increase we're firmly number one in taxes on fuel, and after the tax increased was passed, the state government was forced to reveal that the increase didn't have to be used to fix the roads.
We now have the highest taxes on fuel and one of the highest annual vehicle registration fees in the Country, and most of the money from those goes right into the general fund.
Comments
There’s a whole song about how this works...
its just a bill working its way through the legislature.
Should we be concerned about it after it passes or can we go ahead and argue against it before it does?
The title of the OP recognizes it's a bill.
Normally i'd dismiss this as something that has zero chance. Given the make up if the state legislature and the governor I'm not so sure.
We now have the highest taxes on fuel and one of the highest annual vehicle registration fees in the Country, and most of the money from those goes right into the general fund.