Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Breaking Murkowski comes out against impeachment witnesses, putting Trump on path to acquittal
DJDuck
Member Posts: 5,970
Comments
-
#WINNING
-
Still work to do, ladies.
You'll need to smear your former hero, John Bolton. -
Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.
-
-
75% of Americans want witnesses in the trial. Why is the GOP afraid of?
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/480336-support-for-witnesses-in-senate-trial-at-75-percent-poll -
Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.insinceredawg said:Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.
-
They wanted them in house proceedings tooinsinceredawg said:75% of Americans want witnesses in the trial. Why is the GOP afraid of?
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/480336-support-for-witnesses-in-senate-trial-at-75-percent-poll
What happened there?
Is this what you coogs will be crying about forever?
-
You gotta love Murkowski's argument. She admits there is no way the GOP will give the President's wrongdoing a fair trial so fuck it, why bother calling witnesses. At least she's honest that there is no act the President could undertake at this point that the GOP won't coverup for him.
-
So we can't find out the details of Daddy's abuses until we determine that everyone asking for the truth has only pure motives. (The Constitution as "living, breathing document", I guess.)UW_Doog_Bot said:
Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.insinceredawg said:Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.
-
That was the House's responsibility retard.insinceredawg said:Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.
Great goalpost moving as always
