Breaking Murkowski comes out against impeachment witnesses, putting Trump on path to acquittal

Sledog

Just think we'll have to read this crap for almost 5 more years! Delicious!

SFGbob

GrundleStiltzkin said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

insinceredawg said:

Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.

So we can't find out the details of Daddy's abuses until we determine that everyone asking for the truth has only pure motives. (The Constitution as "living, breathing document", I guess.)

Imagine thinking you had the evidence for impeachment in the first place without actually having any evidence.

Yes, the emperor's clothes are very impressive!

Someone's mad today. It seems like they probably should have had a fairly airtight case before leaving the House. I mean, that's what they did with Nixon. Why the need for new witnesses in the Senate?

There was already plenty of evidence of the President's guilt. Hell. Much of it played out in public.

It's okay though. It's probably better for his opponents that the facts roll out like a hand of cards. In a few months or years, you'll all be "adjusting" your positions on this and it will be impossible to find anyone who will admit to defending Daddy.

which is it?

Whichever one supports what he is saying at that particular moment. When you're an expert at talking out of both sides of your mouth it's always good to give yourself options.

WestlinnDuck

They have spent three years trying to impeach Trump and still the leftards can't cite a crime that he has committed. They just say that there is all this proof and then still decline to cite the crime. Definitely the low information leftard politicians playing to the low information base that they have. The Hondo bros love themselves some Nadler and the Schiffster. Leftards lie and love to be lied to.