Hey 18 year old superstar who has been pampered the last three years do you want to go to Oregon and have hookers and blow or do you want to GRIND at UW
Get them here then break the news that they aren't the shit like they thought they were
exactly. why the fuck are we still selling them on boring work instead of runway models?
If you look at other program's Twitter accounts it's mostly the same shit. Not much going on this time of the year other than winter workouts and promoting NFL combine stuff.
Wilner has been oddly dialed on UW football. Pretty fair assessment
I don’t know if picking Oregon State to finish above UW is fair, but Oregon and Cal is conceivable. I wouldn’t blame a media member for thinking we are going to be terrible on offense.
It was right at about this point last year when I went off on Wilner's predictions of both bay area teams beating Washington and Oregon winning the conference. I typed up some long screed about how there was absolutely no data to support this. The logic behind it seemed to be: 1.) Herbert (who I pointed out hadn't done shit) 2.) Oregon's recruiting class (which I pointed out was neck and neck with Washington's, and it's a bad thing anyway when true freshmen are being counted on for a season's success) 3.) Washington losing the defense and Browning and Gaskin
On this last point, I saw it as Eason > Browning, which turned out to be incorrect (fight me), Wellington and a gaggle of young stud linebackers being better than BBK being the entire linebacking corps, the youngest two DL classes + Onwuzurike being at least as good as the outgoing DL, Tryon being a year improved, and the DBs continuing to be UW DBs. Losing a lot of starters is where the mature, stable Chris Petersen program would really shine through.
Fast forward, and that fucker Wilner was right about everything and the universe no longer made sense.
So, once again, I could point out that Oregon lost the equivalent of their Browning this year and have just as big of a question mark at QB, they lost all but one experienced offensive lineman (but that one is really good), etc., but that would just mean the Huskies would go 0-12, so I won't.
It was right at about this point last year when I went off on Wilner's predictions of both bay area teams beating Washington and Oregon winning the conference. I typed up some long screed about how there was absolutely no data to support this. The logic behind it seemed to be: 1.) Herbert (who I pointed out hadn't done shit) 2.) Oregon's recruiting class (which I pointed out was neck and neck with Washington's, and it's a bad thing anyway when true freshmen are being counted on for a season's success) 3.) Washington losing the defense and Browning and Gaskin
On this last point, I saw it as Eason > Browning, which turned out to be incorrect (fight me), Wellington and a gaggle of young stud linebackers being better than BBK being the entire linebacking corps, the youngest two DL classes + Onwuzurike being at least as good as the outgoing DL, Tryon being a year improved, and the DBs continuing to be UW DBs. Losing a lot of starters is where the mature, stable Chris Petersen program would really shine through.
Fast forward, and that fucker Wilner was right about everything and the universe no longer made sense.
So, once again, I could point out that Oregon lost the equivalent of their Browning this year and have just as big of a question mark at QB, they lost all but one experienced offensive lineman (but that one is really good), etc., but that would just mean the Huskies would go 0-12, so I won't.
Comments
Is this guy retarded?
1.) Herbert (who I pointed out hadn't done shit)
2.) Oregon's recruiting class (which I pointed out was neck and neck with Washington's, and it's a bad thing anyway when true freshmen are being counted on for a season's success)
3.) Washington losing the defense and Browning and Gaskin
On this last point, I saw it as Eason > Browning, which turned out to be incorrect (fight me), Wellington and a gaggle of young stud linebackers being better than BBK being the entire linebacking corps, the youngest two DL classes + Onwuzurike being at least as good as the outgoing DL, Tryon being a year improved, and the DBs continuing to be UW DBs. Losing a lot of starters is where the mature, stable Chris Petersen program would really shine through.
Fast forward, and that fucker Wilner was right about everything and the universe no longer made sense.
So, once again, I could point out that Oregon lost the equivalent of their Browning this year and have just as big of a question mark at QB, they lost all but one experienced offensive lineman (but that one is really good), etc., but that would just mean the Huskies would go 0-12, so I won't.