What is it with Seattle sports media?
Comments
-
Passion'd that for youMikeDamone said:
Disagree. We have to occasionally be reminded of the suffering we have endured to get us here. It would be like forgetting the tyranny of the Gestapo that controls the Republican Party.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I hate it when der Golve is right, but dude is totally right here.TheGlove said:
You're butthurtedness over doogman is well documented. I'm torn.DerekJohnson said:I remember an internal email that Dave Samek sent to all Dawgman staff in 2003. He said how great it was that I was writing articles "telling it like it is" while Fetters and others were doing the "nuts and bolts" stuff... He loved the direction we were all going... And then Kim told me that Fetters responded with a furious tirade at him and Dave, basically expressing that he felt unappreciated.
Then somewhere along the line, Kim started telling me "we don't do editorials." Imagine my surprise each week as Baird wrote a pro-Ty editorial, followed by Samek's Profile in Courage editorial in Oct 2008. Oh well, what are you gonna do?
Half the time I think: Let.It.Go.
The other half of the time I think: Exposing GrinFatters never gets old, kind of the Grateful Dead (best jam band of all time)
The other 50% of the time, I'm like: DIAFF. Lather.Rinse. Repeat. Water wettens.
It probably is time to let it go.
I couple years back I forget about 9/11 for a few days, then I saw a t shirt and remembered. DJ is our t shirt.
Thank you.
-
Welcome to my internal dialogue.TheGlove said:
You're butthurtedness over doogman is well documented. I'm torn.DerekJohnson said:I remember an internal email that Dave Samek sent to all Dawgman staff in 2003. He said how great it was that I was writing articles "telling it like it is" while Fetters and others were doing the "nuts and bolts" stuff... He loved the direction we were all going... And then Kim told me that Fetters responded with a furious tirade at him and Dave, basically expressing that he felt unappreciated.
Then somewhere along the line, Kim started telling me "we don't do editorials." Imagine my surprise each week as Baird wrote a pro-Ty editorial, followed by Samek's Profile in Courage editorial in Oct 2008. Oh well, what are you gonna do?
Half the time I think: Let.It.Go.
The other half of the time I think: Exposing GrinFatters never gets old, kind of the Grateful Dead (best jam band of all time)
The other 50% of the time, I'm like: DIAFF. Lather.Rinse. Repeat. Water wettens. -
If your internal dialogue gets on the external board you're gone
-
I dread the day that I will have to give myself a timeout.RaceBannon said:If your internal dialogue gets on the external board you're gone
-
youtu.be/D85uwYtiRfcDerekJohnson said:
Welcome to my internal dialogue.TheGlove said:
You're butthurtedness over doogman is well documented. I'm torn.DerekJohnson said:I remember an internal email that Dave Samek sent to all Dawgman staff in 2003. He said how great it was that I was writing articles "telling it like it is" while Fetters and others were doing the "nuts and bolts" stuff... He loved the direction we were all going... And then Kim told me that Fetters responded with a furious tirade at him and Dave, basically expressing that he felt unappreciated.
Then somewhere along the line, Kim started telling me "we don't do editorials." Imagine my surprise each week as Baird wrote a pro-Ty editorial, followed by Samek's Profile in Courage editorial in Oct 2008. Oh well, what are you gonna do?
Half the time I think: Let.It.Go.
The other half of the time I think: Exposing GrinFatters never gets old, kind of the Grateful Dead (best jam band of all time)
The other 50% of the time, I'm like: DIAFF. Lather.Rinse. Repeat. Water wettens.
