Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Big Dick QB stats update
YellowSnow
Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 
It's pretty chinteresting to compare Eason's 2019 stats vis-a-vis his peers for ALL GAMES as contrasted with FBS WINNING RECORD only. He's performed a lot better (i.e., 3rd best rating in the Pac) against the good teams vs overall (i.e., 7th best QB rating). Notice by the way, Huntley's numbers for all games vs against good teams.
Comments
-
Glad I got on board. Way better season than brownsocks ever had. 10 win seasons are overrated anyway
-
Got give Pete credit, he sure knows how to neuter any QB, specially talented onesMikeDamone said:Glad I got on board. Way better season than brownsocks ever had. 10 win seasons are overrated anyway
-
Eason wasn't the messiah we hoped for in 2019. Statistically, he was still an upgrade over Browning. I'd like to see what he can do if we can unfuck the offense and have a HC who isn't burned out and mailing it in.MikeDamone said:Glad I got on board. Way better season than brownsocks ever had. 10 win seasons are overrated anyway
-
Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB. -
I thought Eason played well....Chico, Opera Singer and Fuller became totally invisible. Criminal how bad they were.
-
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB. -
Joe Burrow....true?Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB. -
Watson, Mariota, and Cam Newton were all game changer, messiah QBs. Eason was nowhere near these guys, but he played well enough for this team to be 10-2. Cal, Stanford and Colorado were burned out coach, un-inspired crap football.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB. -
We?YellowSnow said:
Eason wasn't the messiah we hoped for in 2019. Statistically, he was still an upgrade over Browning. I'd like to see what he can do if we can unfuck the offense and have a HC who isn't burned out and mailing it in.MikeDamone said:Glad I got on board. Way better season than brownsocks ever had. 10 win seasons are overrated anyway
-
People forget get threw two game changing pick 6's and couldn't muster getting UW into field goal range vs CAL. people forget that.YellowSnow said:
Watson, Mariota, and Cam Newton were all game changer, messiah QBs. Eason was nowhere near these guys, but he played well enough for this team to be 10-2. Cal, Stanford and Colorado were burned out coach, un-inspired crap football.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB. -
Yeah, Eason had a shit game against Utah and was a big factor in that particular loss. I didn't say he played well enough for 12-0. Our secondary also got lit the fuck up that game by Huntley. Against, Cal, his teammates did everything they could in terms of penalties and drops to lose that game.MikeDamone said:
People forget get threw two game changing pick 6's and couldn't muster getting UW into field goal range vs CAL. people forget that.YellowSnow said:
Watson, Mariota, and Cam Newton were all game changer, messiah QBs. Eason was nowhere near these guys, but he played well enough for this team to be 10-2. Cal, Stanford and Colorado were burned out coach, un-inspired crap football.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB.
The point still stands which is that Eason isn't the primary reason we went 7-5. -
I like Eason, but the guy has severe limitations to his game. His ability to deal with a pass rush is low.
So much of college football is won by guys who can give themselves two or three chances to fix a play on the fly.
He is simply not that guy and he never will be. He needs a dominant talent at RB or he will never be a top performer in college. -
And he's not the elite QBs you all dooged over after EWU.YellowSnow said:
Yeah, Eason had a shit game against Utah and was a big factor in that particular loss. I didn't say he played well enough for 12-0. Our secondary also got lit the fuck up that game by Huntley. Against, Cal, his teammates did everything they could in terms of penalties and drops to lose that game.MikeDamone said:
People forget get threw two game changing pick 6's and couldn't muster getting UW into field goal range vs CAL. people forget that.YellowSnow said:
Watson, Mariota, and Cam Newton were all game changer, messiah QBs. Eason was nowhere near these guys, but he played well enough for this team to be 10-2. Cal, Stanford and Colorado were burned out coach, un-inspired crap football.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB.
The point still stands which is that Eason isn't the primary reason we went 7-5. -
Is it a good thing or a bad thing when I read Justin Herbert’s name I hear Preston’s voice in my head?
-
No he's not. I already said I would apologize TO YOUR FACE.MikeDamone said:
And he's not the elite QBs you all dooged over after EWU.YellowSnow said:
Yeah, Eason had a shit game against Utah and was a big factor in that particular loss. I didn't say he played well enough for 12-0. Our secondary also got lit the fuck up that game by Huntley. Against, Cal, his teammates did everything they could in terms of penalties and drops to lose that game.MikeDamone said:
People forget get threw two game changing pick 6's and couldn't muster getting UW into field goal range vs CAL. people forget that.YellowSnow said:
Watson, Mariota, and Cam Newton were all game changer, messiah QBs. Eason was nowhere near these guys, but he played well enough for this team to be 10-2. Cal, Stanford and Colorado were burned out coach, un-inspired crap football.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB.
The point still stands which is that Eason isn't the primary reason we went 7-5. -
He's an average to slightly above average qb.
Browning was below average. -
Makes sense. His worst games were against Oregon State, Stanford, and Colorado. He also blew the game vs Utah but had pretty good numbers other than the 2 picks.
He wasn’t necessarily the problem, but he wasn’t a huge asset either. He didn’t necessarily win any games for us either. -
Joe Burrow....true?Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
I thought they did kick the field goal to win against Cal. It was the defenseMikeDamone said:
People forget get threw two game changing pick 6's and couldn't muster getting UW into field goal range vs CAL. people forget that.YellowSnow said:
Watson, Mariota, and Cam Newton were all game changer, messiah QBs. Eason was nowhere near these guys, but he played well enough for this team to be 10-2. Cal, Stanford and Colorado were burned out coach, un-inspired crap football.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB.
I could very well be wrong though
(Insert Opera Singer dropping td pass here) -
I don;t think that Eason liked what was going on but didn't feel like he earned the cred to say as much as he would like. He mentioned a couple of times that he said something but the team was still pretty lifeless and passive and so was Big Dick
If he stays Jimmy needs to take the leash off and let the Big Dick eat
This team needs leaders among the players more than anything. -
I'd like to see what Eason can do on an inspired team with better leadership from him and others. Guess we'll know soon enough if we'll get the opportunity or not.RaceBannon said:I don;t think that Eason liked what was going on but didn't feel like he earned the cred to say as much as he would like. He mentioned a couple of times that he said something but the team was still pretty lifeless and passive and so was Big Dick
If he stays Jimmy needs to take the leash off and let the Big Dick eat
This team needs leaders among the players more than anything. -
Why do you hate Tim Tebow?YellowSnow said:
Watson, Mariota, and Cam Newton were all game changer, messiah QBs. Eason was nowhere near these guys, but he played well enough for this team to be 10-2. Cal, Stanford and Colorado were burned out coach, un-inspired crap football.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB.
-
I don't. But Cam, Marcus and Watson all played on teams that which were well outside of the usual Top 10 or better talent level (by TBS rankings) and willed their squads to NT game (and won it in 2/3 of these examples). Those Florida teams were usual in the Top 5 give or take in terms of overall talent.Mosster47 said:
Why do you hate Tim Tebow?YellowSnow said:
Watson, Mariota, and Cam Newton were all game changer, messiah QBs. Eason was nowhere near these guys, but he played well enough for this team to be 10-2. Cal, Stanford and Colorado were burned out coach, un-inspired crap football.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB.
But yes, Tebow had more of a religious flair about him. -
Meanwhile down at USC, Slovis might be the best QB in the PAC next year.
-
QBs should be at the center of inspiring the team and providing leadership. If he didn't do it last year what mss as makes you think he'll do it in the future. He was a major disappointment in that area.YellowSnow said:
I'd like to see what Eason can do on an inspired team with better leadership from him and others. Guess we'll know soon enough if we'll get the opportunity or not.RaceBannon said:I don;t think that Eason liked what was going on but didn't feel like he earned the cred to say as much as he would like. He mentioned a couple of times that he said something but the team was still pretty lifeless and passive and so was Big Dick
If he stays Jimmy needs to take the leash off and let the Big Dick eat
This team needs leaders among the players more than anything. -
What @RaceBannon said.MikeDamone said:
QBs should be at the center of inspiring the team and providing leadership. If he didn't do it last year what mss as makes you think he'll do it in the future. He was a major disappointment in that area.YellowSnow said:
I'd like to see what Eason can do on an inspired team with better leadership from him and others. Guess we'll know soon enough if we'll get the opportunity or not.RaceBannon said:I don;t think that Eason liked what was going on but didn't feel like he earned the cred to say as much as he would like. He mentioned a couple of times that he said something but the team was still pretty lifeless and passive and so was Big Dick
If he stays Jimmy needs to take the leash off and let the Big Dick eat
This team needs leaders among the players more than anything.
Ultimately, I don't really care about Eason's pro career. All that matters to me is what they do for my? Alma mater. If Eason gives us the best chance to win the Pac in 2020 I want him back. -
But, but... Joe Burrow!MikeDamone said:
QBs should be at the center of inspiring the team and providing leadership. If he didn't do it last year what mss as makes you think he'll do it in the future. He was a major disappointment in that area.YellowSnow said:
I'd like to see what Eason can do on an inspired team with better leadership from him and others. Guess we'll know soon enough if we'll get the opportunity or not.RaceBannon said:I don;t think that Eason liked what was going on but didn't feel like he earned the cred to say as much as he would like. He mentioned a couple of times that he said something but the team was still pretty lifeless and passive and so was Big Dick
If he stays Jimmy needs to take the leash off and let the Big Dick eat
This team needs leaders among the players more than anything.
Honestly the leadership talk is kind of overrated to me. It’s kind of cliche and gets thrown around for winners. -
Fuck off cunt.Mosster47 said:
Why do you hate Tim Tebow?YellowSnow said:
Watson, Mariota, and Cam Newton were all game changer, messiah QBs. Eason was nowhere near these guys, but he played well enough for this team to be 10-2. Cal, Stanford and Colorado were burned out coach, un-inspired crap football.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree, college football history is littered with teams that over-achieved because of a game changer quarterback. There's a reason Mark Helfrich coached in a national title game.Houhusky said:Repeat after me:
There is no such thing as a savior QB.
Eason is far from the biggest problem on this year's team, but we still win a lot more than 7 games if we have a "savior" at QB. -
I'd like to see what Eason can do without the brainlock of a 20 multiples FS offense. Maybe he sucks, maybe he's a savior EWIWBC.
Let it Rip! -
In fairness to Eason, I didn't turn on Browing until well into 2017 when it became clear early 2016 was his ceiling and he was in full regression mode. At this point, Eason doesn't look like a pro bowler at the next level. But it's certainly possible he could have a 1st or 2nd team all Pac 12 type of season in 2020 if the o-line isn't a total dumpster fire and Newton and Cam Davis can move the sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd like to see what Eason can do without the brainlock of a 20 multiples FS offense. Maybe he sucks, maybe he's a savior EWIWBC.
Let it Rip!
