Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pac-12 coaches envy the Quooks

2»

Comments

  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,171

    “That team had just four all-conference offensive and defensive players — FOUR! — in a vote of the head coaches taken in the 48 hours after the championship.

    They watched the Ducks win the North.

    They watched the Ducks win the conference.

    And then they voted … and only four spots out of the 46 available on offense and defense went to the Ducks.”




    “This is entirely about Cristobal’s peers.

    (The head coaches, by the way, aren’t allowed to vote for their own players.)

    — Maybe it’s merely a coincidence, a head-scratching, history-making, utterly baffling but totally innocent one-off.

    — Maybe the Pac-12 coaches believed … truly believed … that Oregon lacked a significant amount of high-level talent.

    But if so, then shouldn’t Cristobal have been named Coach of the Year?

    Because it has to be one or the other:

    To win nine out of 10 against conference opponents and dominate the championship, you either possess a load of talent relative to everyone else or you’ve produced some damn fine coaching.”



    “ Based on historical voting patterns (facts) and what we witnessed on the field (scoreboard), the Hotline can draw only one conclusion from the way Cristobal and his players were treated:

    It was personal.”

    Logical fallacy
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,005
    It's the P12. Really, nobody should care.
  • LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,788

    “That team had just four all-conference offensive and defensive players — FOUR! — in a vote of the head coaches taken in the 48 hours after the championship.

    They watched the Ducks win the North.

    They watched the Ducks win the conference.

    And then they voted … and only four spots out of the 46 available on offense and defense went to the Ducks.”




    “This is entirely about Cristobal’s peers.

    (The head coaches, by the way, aren’t allowed to vote for their own players.)

    — Maybe it’s merely a coincidence, a head-scratching, history-making, utterly baffling but totally innocent one-off.

    — Maybe the Pac-12 coaches believed … truly believed … that Oregon lacked a significant amount of high-level talent.

    But if so, then shouldn’t Cristobal have been named Coach of the Year?

    Because it has to be one or the other:

    To win nine out of 10 against conference opponents and dominate the championship, you either possess a load of talent relative to everyone else or you’ve produced some damn fine coaching.”



    “ Based on historical voting patterns (facts) and what we witnessed on the field (scoreboard), the Hotline can draw only one conclusion from the way Cristobal and his players were treated:

    It was personal.”

    Imagine a husky fan (or anyone but a dook) actually giving a shit about any of this.....
Sign In or Register to comment.