Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Pac-12 coaches envy the Quooks
DoogWhisperer
Member Posts: 1,024
I want us to get to this level of being envied.
"Washington, which finished four games behind the Ducks in the North, had more first-team selections (five) than the Ducks had total selections (four)."
https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/12/11/oregon-had-just-four-all-conference-honorees-must-be-a-coincidence-unless-its-not-ready-for-a-good-conspiracy-theory/
"Washington, which finished four games behind the Ducks in the North, had more first-team selections (five) than the Ducks had total selections (four)."
https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/12/11/oregon-had-just-four-all-conference-honorees-must-be-a-coincidence-unless-its-not-ready-for-a-good-conspiracy-theory/
Comments
Huh.....
So we're? even
But I get the sentiment.
Never happened before with other staffs. But maybe.
They watched the Ducks win the North.
They watched the Ducks win the conference.
And then they voted … and only four spots out of the 46 available on offense and defense went to the Ducks.”
“This is entirely about Cristobal’s peers.
(The head coaches, by the way, aren’t allowed to vote for their own players.)
— Maybe it’s merely a coincidence, a head-scratching, history-making, utterly baffling but totally innocent one-off.
— Maybe the Pac-12 coaches believed … truly believed … that Oregon lacked a significant amount of high-level talent.
But if so, then shouldn’t Cristobal have been named Coach of the Year?
Because it has to be one or the other:
To win nine out of 10 against conference opponents and dominate the championship, you either possess a load of talent relative to everyone else or you’ve produced some damn fine coaching.”
“ Based on historical voting patterns (facts) and what we witnessed on the field (scoreboard), the Hotline can draw only one conclusion from the way Cristobal and his players were treated:
It was personal.”