Bush's never ending couch sale
Comments
-
To an extent that is true of any position. You still got to get those guys dialed in, focused, set a high standard, keep them improving, etc.Emoterman said:
I understand why needing to be well coached in the NFL matters, precise timing routes being necessary for passing to be consistently successful.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
But in college, just get physical monsters who can abuse the inferior DBs they face or are open because of coverage lapses regardless of the crispness of their route. -
Classic case of the Peter principle. No harm in him recognizing that and becoming a lifelong WR coach.Bread said:Your crazy all but 2015 are promotions. The only weird thing is how he managed to land a promotion every year. Trying to turn that into a negative is the biggest twist of the year
-
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either. -
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
-
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
-
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better -
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better -
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
-
SCO DAWGS!backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
-
Sarkasms when talking about an offseason natty.dnc said:
SCO DAWGS!backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
Difference is I said it ironically. You said beast and yore a grown man. Take off the elite socks and shorts and use REAL sophisticated dictation. -
Lately?dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better -
what else is gnu?RaceBannon said:
Lately?dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better -
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.backthepack said:
Sarkasms when talking about an offseason natty.dnc said:
SCO DAWGS!backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
Difference is I said it ironically. You said beast and yore a grown man. Take off the elite socks and shorts and use REAL sophisticated dictation.
Good chit as always. -
It’s all the rage with the middle school keeeds. I thought you’d be up to date with “beast” fashion?dnc said:
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.backthepack said:
Sarkasms when talking about an offseason natty.dnc said:
SCO DAWGS!backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
Difference is I said it ironically. You said beast and yore a grown man. Take off the elite socks and shorts and use REAL sophisticated dictation.
Good chit as always.
-
Is BEAST better or worse than ELITE?backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
-
Killer prank Farvabackthepack said:
It’s all the rage with the middle school keeeds. I thought you’d be up to date with “beast” fashion?dnc said:
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.backthepack said:
Sarkasms when talking about an offseason natty.dnc said:
SCO DAWGS!backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
Difference is I said it ironically. You said beast and yore a grown man. Take off the elite socks and shorts and use REAL sophisticated dictation.
Good chit as always.
-
Dating yourself. Old man.dnc said:
Killer prank Farvabackthepack said:
It’s all the rage with the middle school keeeds. I thought you’d be up to date with “beast” fashion?dnc said:
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.backthepack said:
Sarkasms when talking about an offseason natty.dnc said:
SCO DAWGS!backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
Difference is I said it ironically. You said beast and yore a grown man. Take off the elite socks and shorts and use REAL sophisticated dictation.
Good chit as always. -
Houhusky said:
Is BEAST better or worse than ELITE?backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
Nike Elite apparel is so “beast” dood!!! -
This isn't Tis Tok kiddo, if you want someone to give you a Gen Z safe space there's plenty of places you can go be around your kind.backthepack said:
Dating yourself. Old man.dnc said:
Killer prank Farvabackthepack said:
It’s all the rage with the middle school keeeds. I thought you’d be up to date with “beast” fashion?dnc said:
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.backthepack said:
Sarkasms when talking about an offseason natty.dnc said:
SCO DAWGS!backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
Difference is I said it ironically. You said beast and yore a grown man. Take off the elite socks and shorts and use REAL sophisticated dictation.
Good chit as always. -
I’m too old for Tik Tok.dnc said:
This isn't Tis Tok kiddo, if you want someone to give you a Gen Z safe space there's plenty of places you can go be around your kind.backthepack said:
Dating yourself. Old man.dnc said:
Killer prank Farvabackthepack said:
It’s all the rage with the middle school keeeds. I thought you’d be up to date with “beast” fashion?dnc said:
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.backthepack said:
Sarkasms when talking about an offseason natty.dnc said:
SCO DAWGS!backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
Difference is I said it ironically. You said beast and yore a grown man. Take off the elite socks and shorts and use REAL sophisticated dictation.
Good chit as always.
-
I’ll tell him to call them really good players to appease you, Anus Angel.backthepack said:
Sarkasms when talking about an offseason natty.dnc said:
SCO DAWGS!backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better
Difference is I said it ironically. You said beast and yore a grown man. Take off the elite socks and shorts and use REAL sophisticated dictation. -
wait when did it become uncool to describe someone like clowney as a beast
i'm not stopping fuck you -
There is NOTHING ELITE about the UW program, this board, or its poasters. End.Houhusky said:
Is BEAST better or worse than ELITE?backthepack said:
I’m not the one saying beast.dnc said:
You've really been struggling latelybackthepack said:
“Beast”dnc said:
Cheerio little anus angel!backthepack said:
You should douse yourself in gasoline and light yourself on fire for saying “beast”.dnc said:
RB yes. But WR has a lot more technical aspects to it. WRs are much less likely to be beasts as frosh/rookies than RBs are.backthepack said:I think WR coach is something that’s overrated coaching wise anyways. Just get the fucking talent.
It’s not OL or QB but it’s not pure talent either.
What are you a angsty pre-teen?
Haha what a faggy statement. Be better -
ITT BTP proudly shares all he knows about the latest trends in middle school, I wouldn't consider him an arbiter of what's actually cool.Gladstone said:wait when did it become uncool to describe someone like clowney as a beast
i'm not stopping fuck you -
It’s fine when talking about an individual. Weird move when you call a group or a inatimate object “beast”.Gladstone said:wait when did it become uncool to describe someone like clowney as a beast
i'm not stopping fuck you
In summary don’t use the plural “beasts” it’s corny -
It was the trend when I was in MS. No clue now. They’re all probably juuling, sitting on tik tok, and acting TUFF towards mom n daddnc said:
ITT BTP proudly shares all he knows about the latest trends in middle school, I wouldn't consider him an arbiter of what's actually cool.Gladstone said:wait when did it become uncool to describe someone like clowney as a beast
i'm not stopping fuck you -
Add a "n" to the "a" when the next letter is a vowel, then pop-offbackthepack said:
It’s fine when talking about an individual. Weird move when you call a group or an inatimate object “beast”.Gladstone said:wait when did it become uncool to describe someone like clowney as a beast
i'm not stopping fuck you
In summary don’t use the plural “beasts” it’s corny -
I never said anything about being literate hthBaseman said:
Add a "n" to the "a" when the next letter is a vowel, then pop-offbackthepack said:
It’s fine when talking about an individual. Weird move when you call a group or an inatimate object “beast”.Gladstone said:wait when did it become uncool to describe someone like clowney as a beast
i'm not stopping fuck you
In summary don’t use the plural “beasts” it’s corny -
Meds not dialed in.backthepack said:
It’s fine when talking about an individual. Weird move when you call a group or a inatimate object “beast”.Gladstone said:wait when did it become uncool to describe someone like clowney as a beast
i'm not stopping fuck you
In summary don’t use the plural “beasts” it’s corny -
Ok!dnc said:
Meds not dialed in.backthepack said:
It’s fine when talking about an individual. Weird move when you call a group or a inatimate object “beast”.Gladstone said:wait when did it become uncool to describe someone like clowney as a beast
i'm not stopping fuck you
In summary don’t use the plural “beasts” it’s corny