If Hamdan is retained

TurdBomber

When Leach's offense is down by three touchdowns, he attacks.
When Peterson's offense is down by one touchdown, he shits the bed, the couch, the ez chair, the sink and the car seat.
It's time to bring in a legit D1 OC and pay him/zir/xe what he's worth.

TurdBomber

BeerThirty said:

Pete's offense sucks but Hamden makes it look worse. His play selection is mind boggling so often. The guy can't call a game to save his life. A good OC could make lemonade out of lemons. Hamden can't figure out how to make lemon koolaid

In short yardage situations, always run or throw laterally because you know your offense can't push downfield for a first down without trickery or deception.
The message there is clear: No We Can't Offensive Philosophy Identity.

Postal91

TurdBomber said:

can't push downfield for a first down without trickery or deception.

What I find interesting is that any and all 'trickery' on Pete's part happen/unfolds 1 yard (and greater) BEHIND the LOS. And rarely, likely never, does the ball go downfield by the QB when said play is being run. No routes, fakes or blocking schemes to freeze the secondary and get a WR behind them or in the clear... unless it is reversed at a minimum of 4 times. When was the last time we ran a true screen to the RB straight up, within the tackles? Our plays all seem to be set with the expectation that WRs get separation, but the WRs we play cannot get that (especially when your 1st 2 reads involve a certain opera singer).... and when someone like Chincredible does, he gets ghosted. (Seriously, WTF was he vs Colo)

I want to win these next few games, but I'm fearful like others that if our offense shows hope.... we are screwed.

TurdBomber

Postal91 said:

TurdBomber said:

can't push downfield for a first down without trickery or deception.

What I find interesting is that any and all 'trickery' on Pete's part happen/unfolds 1 yard (and greater) BEHIND the LOS. And rarely, likely never, does the ball go downfield by the QB when said play is being run. No routes, fakes or blocking schemes to freeze the secondary and get a WR behind them or in the clear... unless it is reversed at a minimum of 4 times. When was the last time we ran a true screen to the RB straight up, within the tackles? Our plays all seem to be set with the expectation that WRs get separation, but the WRs we play cannot get that (especially when your 1st 2 reads involve a certain opera singer).... and when someone like Chincredible does, he gets ghosted. (Seriously, WTF was he vs Colo)

I want to win these next few games, but I'm fearful like others that if our offense shows hope.... we are screwed.

You have to believe in your players, versus your intellectual brilliance, trickery and luck. Again, it's David vs. Goliath, and Goliath wins 999 times out of 1000 without David getting that lucky Statue of Liberty play with that shepherd's sling & rock.

LesGrossman

Alexis said:

If he's not serious, he brings back Hamden, or pulls in Browning as his new OC.

Jesus.