It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
They had private hearings to corroborate what the whistleblower said. Now it's becoming public. Keep up.
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
So you have no idea about article 2 section 4, among thousands of other things. He’s not the complainant.
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
Have you missed all the relevant testimony? Google is your friend.
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
Have you missed all the relevant testimony? Google is your friend.
The chick who exonerated Trump? Yeah we all read it
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
Have you missed all the relevant testimony? Google is your friend.
The chick who exonerated Trump? Yeah we all read it
Case closed
And you wonder why they call you a simple mind Race.
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
Have you missed all the relevant testimony? Google is your friend.
The chick who exonerated Trump? Yeah we all read it
Case closed
And you wonder why they call you a simple mind Race.
Nothing impeachable. Absolutely nothing. But we already knew that.
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
Have you missed all the relevant testimony? Google is your friend.
The chick who exonerated Trump? Yeah we all read it
Case closed
And you wonder why they call you a simple mind Race.
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
Have you missed all the relevant testimony? Google is your friend.
The chick who exonerated Trump? Yeah we all read it
Case closed
And you wonder why they call you a simple mind Race.
Nothing impeachable. Absolutely nothing. But we already knew that.
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
Have you missed all the relevant testimony? Google is your friend.
The chick who exonerated Trump? Yeah we all read it
Case closed
And you wonder why they call you a simple mind Race.
It was fun watching a Hondo laying his trap over a couple posts, only to have the snare made of dental floss.
Except I'm right. And sadly you know it.
I don't know the evidentiary rules of impeachment proceedings or whatever the fuck phase this is in, and doubt you do either. Between that, Schiff apparently reneging on bringing the blower in to testify, and general principles of American due process, is why I called your trap thin.
Serious question. If everyone around Trump corroborates the whistleblower. Is the whistleblower testimony relevant?
Second question, do you believe in whistleblower protections?
Because he the whistleblower is the complainant. It's all that legal Shit.
The whistleblower is not the complainant. You need to read the constitution.
Yes he is. Impeachment isn't by anonymous complaint. HTH
Have you missed all the relevant testimony? Google is your friend.
The chick who exonerated Trump? Yeah we all read it
Case closed
And you wonder why they call you a simple mind Race.
I don't know with this kind of damming testimony how can trump escape impeachment?
“Taylor indicated that he had talked to Tim Morrison … and Tim had indicated he had talked to Gordon, and Gordon told … Tim, and Tim told Bill Taylor that he, Gordon, had talked to the president. … And POTUS wanted nothing less than President Zelensky to go [on] microphone and say investigations, Biden and Clinton.”
I don't know with this kind of damming testimony how can trump escape impeachment?
“Taylor indicated that he had talked to Tim Morrison … and Tim had indicated he had talked to Gordon, and Gordon told … Tim, and Tim told Bill Taylor that he, Gordon, had talked to the president. … And POTUS wanted nothing less than President Zelensky to go [on] microphone and say investigations, Biden and Clinton.”
I don't know with this kind of damming testimony how can trump escape impeachment?
“Taylor indicated that he had talked to Tim Morrison … and Tim had indicated he had talked to Gordon, and Gordon told … Tim, and Tim told Bill Taylor that he, Gordon, had talked to the president. … And POTUS wanted nothing less than President Zelensky to go [on] microphone and say investigations, Biden and Clinton.”
Comments
Case closed
Not surprising that you missed it
Exonerated
“Taylor indicated that he had talked to Tim Morrison … and Tim had indicated he had talked to Gordon, and Gordon told … Tim, and Tim told Bill Taylor that he, Gordon, had talked to the president. … And POTUS wanted nothing less than President Zelensky to go [on] microphone and say investigations, Biden and Clinton.”
And these are the "star" witnesses!
Wasn't this the basic plot of Mean Girls?