Why the HondoBros will fail

Sledog

Because Americans won't let you commies succeed!

https://reason.com/2019/11/03/what-is-a-well-regulated-militia-anyway/

MikeDamone

Well regulated means lots of regulations.

Sledog

MikeDamone said:

Well regulated means lots of regulations.

Time to mark the commies. Again.

Sledog

Oh and lets treat gun control with the same liberal logic as birth control!

Tell 'em Babushka!

2001400ex

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

pawz

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

If you shoot yourself in the head, I'll reconsider my gun control position. Deal?

2001400ex

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

If you shoot yourself in the head, I'll reconsider my gun control position. Deal?

Triggered much?

pawz

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

If you shoot yourself in the head, I'll reconsider my gun control position. Deal?

Triggered much?

How so?

Sledog

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

2001400ex

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

What a fucking Kunt. Yeah the shared characteristics of people who murder other people with guns is their lack of training and respect for guns.

You squat when you pee don’t you Hondo

Sledog

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

2001400ex

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Sledog

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Let's take guns from bad people, lock crazy people up where they belong keep bad people in prison. Let's start with the bad people to stop bad things. Law abiding gun owners are, wait for it, law abiding.

2001400ex

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Let's take guns from bad people, lock crazy people up where they belong keep bad people in prison. Let's start with the bad people to stop bad things. Law abiding gun owners are, wait for it, law abiding.

Most people who commit mass murders haven't committed a crime until they decided to shoot up some place. So again, you are accomplishing nothing.

MikeDamone

Gun laws don’t work.

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

Gun laws don’t work.

Sledog disagrees with you. Before he agrees with you.

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Walls?

Idiot

Sledog

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Let's take guns from bad people, lock crazy people up where they belong keep bad people in prison. Let's start with the bad people to stop bad things. Law abiding gun owners are, wait for it, law abiding.

Most people who commit mass murders haven't committed a crime until they decided to shoot up some place. So again, you are accomplishing nothing.

Yet many were mentally unstable and there were many warning signs. Kind of like you. I'm sure we'll read about you one day.

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Let's take guns from bad people, lock crazy people up where they belong keep bad people in prison. Let's start with the bad people to stop bad things. Law abiding gun owners are, wait for it, law abiding.

Most people who commit mass murders haven't committed a crime until they decided to shoot up some place. So again, you are accomplishing nothing.

Btw, I'll bet this statement isn't even accurate unless you heavily restrict what constitutes a mass shooting. If a "mass shooting" is made of any shooting that involves two or more people I'll guarantee you that Hondo's claim is bullshit.

Sledog

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Let's take guns from bad people, lock crazy people up where they belong keep bad people in prison. Let's start with the bad people to stop bad things. Law abiding gun owners are, wait for it, law abiding.

Most people who commit mass murders haven't committed a crime until they decided to shoot up some place. So again, you are accomplishing nothing.

Btw, I'll bet this statement isn't even accurate unless you heavily restrict what constitutes a mass shooting. If a "mass shooting" is made of any shooting that involves two or more people I'll guarantee you that Hondo's claim is bullshit.

It's 3 or 4 depending on who's counting. So gang members popping caps into a party hit those thresholds constantly. It's intended to inflate numbers to try and make a case for taking law abiding peoples guns away. Of course the vast majority or murders are committed by those not allowed guns. That the left want to disarm the wrong people isn't a mistake or oversight. As we can nor clearly see that have have gone fully over to communism it's so they can try and establish a new totalitarian government.

This is much like law abiding men cutting off their dicks to prevent rape.

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Walls?

Idiot

Where have I said I want to do nothing about the Mexican border?

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Walls?

Idiot

Where have I said I want to do nothing about the Mexican border?

Pathological liar

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Walls?

Idiot

Where have I said I want to do nothing about the Mexican border?

Pathological liar

So I've never said it. And you clearly agree.

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Walls?

Idiot

Where have I said I want to do nothing about the Mexican border?

Pathological liar

So I've never said it. And you clearly agree.

Pathological liar

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog, you've argued repeatedly that only two shootings have occurred with fully automatic weapons controls were put in place in the early 1900s. Why can't we extend those controls to other weapons that are abused in shootings? Win win. You keep your weapons to do with as you please and there's less shootings.

That shows how uncommon violence is with your normal law abiding gun owner. It's used in as an example because it's one of the only things tracked that definitively. Law abiding gun owners aren't the problem.

I've never said law abiding gun owners are the problem. In fact I've agreed that the vast majority of mass shootings are from people who don't have a respect for guns and aren't trained.

That still doesn't answer why you don't want to do something that makes it so shitbirds don't end up with guns that end up killing a bunch of people.

That's like saying shit birds won't end up with drugs.

Nothing works so let's do nothing POTD.

Walls?

Idiot

Where have I said I want to do nothing about the Mexican border?

Pathological liar

So I've never said it. And you clearly agree.

Pathological liar

Race is repeating gibberish as always.

WestlinnDuck

Hondo lies and loves to be lied to. Pathological is an understatement.