Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Public hearings incoming

2456

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Never mind the whole thing is still a sham with the left covering for liars and not allowing them to be interviewed. The republicans have no subpoena power.

    "Republicans for weeks had challenged Pelosi to hold a floor vote, complaining the inquiry hasn’t followed past precedent and violates the president’s due process rights. While she finally gave in to those demands in a bid to mute their complaints about process, GOP lawmakers continued to call the inquiry a "sham" while complaining that the newly unveiled rules still limit their authority — including by requiring the consent of Democratic chairs to subpoena witnesses."

    Of course they called it a sham. They want to turn it into a Biden investigation.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,820 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Never mind the whole thing is still a sham with the left covering for liars and not allowing them to be interviewed. The republicans have no subpoena power.

    "Republicans for weeks had challenged Pelosi to hold a floor vote, complaining the inquiry hasn’t followed past precedent and violates the president’s due process rights. While she finally gave in to those demands in a bid to mute their complaints about process, GOP lawmakers continued to call the inquiry a "sham" while complaining that the newly unveiled rules still limit their authority — including by requiring the consent of Democratic chairs to subpoena witnesses."

    Of course they called it a sham. They want to turn it into a Biden investigation.
    "One sided hearings are always a sham that's why we always win"-Stalin
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Never mind the whole thing is still a sham with the left covering for liars and not allowing them to be interviewed. The republicans have no subpoena power.

    "Republicans for weeks had challenged Pelosi to hold a floor vote, complaining the inquiry hasn’t followed past precedent and violates the president’s due process rights. While she finally gave in to those demands in a bid to mute their complaints about process, GOP lawmakers continued to call the inquiry a "sham" while complaining that the newly unveiled rules still limit their authority — including by requiring the consent of Democratic chairs to subpoena witnesses."

    Of course they called it a sham. They want to turn it into a Biden investigation.
    "One sided hearings are always a sham that's why we always win"-Stalin
    What other side is there? Trump asked a foreign government to investigate Biden for political reasons. And threatened to withhold aid if they didn't. Hunter and everything else is just to distract simple minds like you.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Never mind the whole thing is still a sham with the left covering for liars and not allowing them to be interviewed. The republicans have no subpoena power.

    "Republicans for weeks had challenged Pelosi to hold a floor vote, complaining the inquiry hasn’t followed past precedent and violates the president’s due process rights. While she finally gave in to those demands in a bid to mute their complaints about process, GOP lawmakers continued to call the inquiry a "sham" while complaining that the newly unveiled rules still limit their authority — including by requiring the consent of Democratic chairs to subpoena witnesses."

    Of course they called it a sham. They want to turn it into a Biden investigation.
    "One sided hearings are always a sham that's why we always win"-Stalin
    What other side is there? Trump asked a foreign government to investigate Biden for political reasons. And threatened to withhold aid if they didn't. Hunter and everything else is just to distract simple minds like you.
    They lie, it's what they do it's who Hondo is.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,123 Founders Club
    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,864 Standard Supporter

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Political opponent immunity.

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Biden did threaten to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians did something he wanted and you didn't give a fuck Hondo. Biden should be investigated and Ukraine's role in the 2016 election should be investigated.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,123 Founders Club

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Political opponent immunity.

    I'm now running for president
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,864 Standard Supporter

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Political opponent immunity.

    I'm now running for president
    #metoo
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Who is saying Biden shouldn't be investigated? Investigate him all you want. But none of that belongs in the impeachment hearings.