Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«13

Comments

  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    They are going to impeach him like a dog!
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,707 Founders Club
    No Republicans voted for the measure on Thursday, while two Democrats voted against it: Reps. Jeff Van Drew, D-N.J., and Collin Peterson, D-Minn.


    According the the @HHusky school of thought Van Drew and Peterson are the REAL democrats here

    Not willing to go along with Tug Mullertards
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

    No Republicans voted for the measure on Thursday, while two Democrats voted against it: Reps. Jeff Van Drew, D-N.J., and Collin Peterson, D-Minn.


    According the the @HHusky school of thought Van Drew and Peterson are the REAL democrats here

    Not willing to go along with Tug Mullertards

    They represent districts won by Trump. Nancy already got the votes so they're just protecting themselves for the next election.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    No Republicans voted for the measure on Thursday, while two Democrats voted against it: Reps. Jeff Van Drew, D-N.J., and Collin Peterson, D-Minn.


    According the the @HHusky school of thought Van Drew and Peterson are the REAL democrats here

    Not willing to go along with Tug Mullertards

    232-196.
    Winners win. Those are the rules.
    This topic deserves at least 5 more threads.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,707 Founders Club

    No Republicans voted for the measure on Thursday, while two Democrats voted against it: Reps. Jeff Van Drew, D-N.J., and Collin Peterson, D-Minn.


    According the the @HHusky school of thought Van Drew and Peterson are the REAL democrats here

    Not willing to go along with Tug Mullertards

    They represent districts won by Trump. Nancy already got the votes so they're just protecting themselves for the next election.
    Whoosh

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    One discussed the vote is coming. Another has the results.

    Don't worry, you don't look too butthurt.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,707 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    One discussed the vote is coming. Another has the results.

    Don't worry, you don't look too butthurt.
    Hey pathological liar its the same fucking story

    You look as stupid as ever
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,469 Standard Supporter
    Never mind the whole thing is still a sham with the left covering for liars and not allowing them to be interviewed. The republicans have no subpoena power.

    "Republicans for weeks had challenged Pelosi to hold a floor vote, complaining the inquiry hasn’t followed past precedent and violates the president’s due process rights. While she finally gave in to those demands in a bid to mute their complaints about process, GOP lawmakers continued to call the inquiry a "sham" while complaining that the newly unveiled rules still limit their authority — including by requiring the consent of Democratic chairs to subpoena witnesses."
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    One discussed the vote is coming. Another has the results.

    Don't worry, you don't look too butthurt.
    Hey pathological liar its the same fucking story

    You look as stupid as ever
    I only read the headline.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Never mind the whole thing is still a sham with the left covering for liars and not allowing them to be interviewed. The republicans have no subpoena power.

    "Republicans for weeks had challenged Pelosi to hold a floor vote, complaining the inquiry hasn’t followed past precedent and violates the president’s due process rights. While she finally gave in to those demands in a bid to mute their complaints about process, GOP lawmakers continued to call the inquiry a "sham" while complaining that the newly unveiled rules still limit their authority — including by requiring the consent of Democratic chairs to subpoena witnesses."

    Of course they called it a sham. They want to turn it into a Biden investigation.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,469 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Never mind the whole thing is still a sham with the left covering for liars and not allowing them to be interviewed. The republicans have no subpoena power.

    "Republicans for weeks had challenged Pelosi to hold a floor vote, complaining the inquiry hasn’t followed past precedent and violates the president’s due process rights. While she finally gave in to those demands in a bid to mute their complaints about process, GOP lawmakers continued to call the inquiry a "sham" while complaining that the newly unveiled rules still limit their authority — including by requiring the consent of Democratic chairs to subpoena witnesses."

    Of course they called it a sham. They want to turn it into a Biden investigation.
    "One sided hearings are always a sham that's why we always win"-Stalin
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Never mind the whole thing is still a sham with the left covering for liars and not allowing them to be interviewed. The republicans have no subpoena power.

    "Republicans for weeks had challenged Pelosi to hold a floor vote, complaining the inquiry hasn’t followed past precedent and violates the president’s due process rights. While she finally gave in to those demands in a bid to mute their complaints about process, GOP lawmakers continued to call the inquiry a "sham" while complaining that the newly unveiled rules still limit their authority — including by requiring the consent of Democratic chairs to subpoena witnesses."

    Of course they called it a sham. They want to turn it into a Biden investigation.
    "One sided hearings are always a sham that's why we always win"-Stalin
    What other side is there? Trump asked a foreign government to investigate Biden for political reasons. And threatened to withhold aid if they didn't. Hunter and everything else is just to distract simple minds like you.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,073
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Never mind the whole thing is still a sham with the left covering for liars and not allowing them to be interviewed. The republicans have no subpoena power.

    "Republicans for weeks had challenged Pelosi to hold a floor vote, complaining the inquiry hasn’t followed past precedent and violates the president’s due process rights. While she finally gave in to those demands in a bid to mute their complaints about process, GOP lawmakers continued to call the inquiry a "sham" while complaining that the newly unveiled rules still limit their authority — including by requiring the consent of Democratic chairs to subpoena witnesses."

    Of course they called it a sham. They want to turn it into a Biden investigation.
    "One sided hearings are always a sham that's why we always win"-Stalin
    What other side is there? Trump asked a foreign government to investigate Biden for political reasons. And threatened to withhold aid if they didn't. Hunter and everything else is just to distract simple minds like you.
    They lie, it's what they do it's who Hondo is.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,707 Founders Club
    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,842 Standard Supporter

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Political opponent immunity.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,073

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Biden did threaten to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians did something he wanted and you didn't give a fuck Hondo. Biden should be investigated and Ukraine's role in the 2016 election should be investigated.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,707 Founders Club

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Political opponent immunity.

    I'm now running for president
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,842 Standard Supporter

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Political opponent immunity.

    I'm now running for president
    #metoo
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Why shouldn't Biden be investigated?

    Who is saying Biden shouldn't be investigated? Investigate him all you want. But none of that belongs in the impeachment hearings.
Sign In or Register to comment.