Federal Income Taxes and Federal Spending Both Set Records in FY19
Comments
-
Bob continues to ignore the question. And won't engage in an honest discussion. As I've stated.SFGbob said:No Bob, the deficit works have increased by less than $10 trillion if spending was kept the same. Got it?
No, I don't "got it" Hondo. As I keep telling you, I don't speak barely literate fucking moron. -
Don't blame me because you write like a fucking moron Hondo.2001400ex said:
Bob continues to ignore the question. And won't engage in an honest discussion. As I've stated.SFGbob said:No Bob, the deficit works have increased by less than $10 trillion if spending was kept the same. Got it?
No, I don't "got it" Hondo. As I keep telling you, I don't speak barely literate fucking moron. -
Answer this question Bob.SFGbob said:
Don't blame me because you write like a fucking moron Hondo.2001400ex said:
Bob continues to ignore the question. And won't engage in an honest discussion. As I've stated.SFGbob said:No Bob, the deficit works have increased by less than $10 trillion if spending was kept the same. Got it?
No, I don't "got it" Hondo. As I keep telling you, I don't speak barely literate fucking moron.
What was the effect on the debt from the reduced revenues as a result of the recession? -
Why didn't Obama do something to increase revenues?2001400ex said:
Answer this question Bob.SFGbob said:
Don't blame me because you write like a fucking moron Hondo.2001400ex said:
Bob continues to ignore the question. And won't engage in an honest discussion. As I've stated.SFGbob said:No Bob, the deficit works have increased by less than $10 trillion if spending was kept the same. Got it?
No, I don't "got it" Hondo. As I keep telling you, I don't speak barely literate fucking moron.
What was the effect on the debt from the reduced revenues as a result of the recession?
-
Less than the effect on the increase in spending.2001400ex said:
Answer this question Bob.SFGbob said:
Don't blame me because you write like a fucking moron Hondo.2001400ex said:
Bob continues to ignore the question. And won't engage in an honest discussion. As I've stated.SFGbob said:No Bob, the deficit works have increased by less than $10 trillion if spending was kept the same. Got it?
No, I don't "got it" Hondo. As I keep telling you, I don't speak barely literate fucking moron.
What was the effect on the debt from the reduced revenues as a result of the recession? -
He did. And you had a meltdown over it.RaceBannon said:
Why didn't Obama do something to increase revenues?2001400ex said:
Answer this question Bob.SFGbob said:
Don't blame me because you write like a fucking moron Hondo.2001400ex said:
Bob continues to ignore the question. And won't engage in an honest discussion. As I've stated.SFGbob said:No Bob, the deficit works have increased by less than $10 trillion if spending was kept the same. Got it?
No, I don't "got it" Hondo. As I keep telling you, I don't speak barely literate fucking moron.
What was the effect on the debt from the reduced revenues as a result of the recession? -
Oh so less. So you now admit you lied when you said the $10 trillion was from increased spending. Nice work.SFGbob said:
Less than the effect on the increase in spending.2001400ex said:
Answer this question Bob.SFGbob said:
Don't blame me because you write like a fucking moron Hondo.2001400ex said:
Bob continues to ignore the question. And won't engage in an honest discussion. As I've stated.SFGbob said:No Bob, the deficit works have increased by less than $10 trillion if spending was kept the same. Got it?
No, I don't "got it" Hondo. As I keep telling you, I don't speak barely literate fucking moron.
What was the effect on the debt from the reduced revenues as a result of the recession? -
No, you lied when you claimed I said that. Quote me saying that Kunt.2001400ex said:
Oh so less. So you now admit you lied when you said the $10 trillion was from increased spending. Nice work.SFGbob said:
Less than the effect on the increase in spending.2001400ex said:
Answer this question Bob.SFGbob said:
Don't blame me because you write like a fucking moron Hondo.2001400ex said:
Bob continues to ignore the question. And won't engage in an honest discussion. As I've stated.SFGbob said:No Bob, the deficit works have increased by less than $10 trillion if spending was kept the same. Got it?
No, I don't "got it" Hondo. As I keep telling you, I don't speak barely literate fucking moron.
What was the effect on the debt from the reduced revenues as a result of the recession? -
I did read what you wrote and unlike you, instead of putting words in your mouth I quoted what you wrote and you fucking lied:2001400ex said:
Actually I didn't lie. Read what I wrote.SFGbob said:
So you confessed to lying. You claimed there were no Republicans that support cutting entitlement spending, and you admitted that there are no Rats that support cutting entitlement spending.2001400ex said:
1) cause no one is cutting from Grandma.SFGbob said:The reality is no Republican supports cutting entitlement spending either
Lie. Why don't the Rats call the Republicans bluff and pass these budgets? Why don't the Rats ever propose and pass these kind of budgets? There are some Republicans who support cutting entitlement spending. There are Zero Rats who support cutting entitlement spending.
2) cause the "rats" know it's unpopular to cut from Grandma.
3) who gives a shit if a few Republicans support cutting entitlements. It won't happen. Why? Cause no one is cutting from Grandma.
So spare me the "pox on both their houses" bullshit when there isn't a single Rat with the balls to cut entitlement spending.
The reality is no Republican supports cutting entitlement spending either
That statement is a flat out lie. -
Btw, if you want to know what dodging a question looks like:
Btw, how could Medicare and SS be "big factors" in increasing the debt when you said: The debt isn't growing because of SS or Medicare?
