Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

BREAKING… AG Bill Barr Announces Durham Probe is Now a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION — Subpoenas Coming!

13

Comments

  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    34 indictments
    7 convictions so far

    You think Barr gets more?
    How many for collusion?

    I'll wait......
    Maybe you missed it in the report you didn’t read. There’s no legal definition of collusion which is precisely why Trump keeps pushing it out for you trumptards to parrot.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,752
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    When there are criminal convictions will you finally LEAVE?
    Hang on now, @Pawz: If Hondo left, who'd establish the left-most tail of the bell curve?
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,851
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited October 2019
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    34 indictments
    7 convictions so far

    You think Barr gets more?
    How many for collusion?

    I'll wait......
    Maybe you missed it in the report you didn’t read. There’s no legal definition of collusion which is precisely why Trump keeps pushing it out for you trumptards to parrot.
    So how did we have a criminal investigation into a non-criminal matter? And then not investigate what the investigation was about but simply comb though peoples personal lives and try and catch them in a lie or misstatement? Or, apparently as we are now discovering, just make up shit?

    And you applaud this type of KGB activity. Oh wait of course you would.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    You really got em now!!
    Oh, I see. I thought you were using a qualifier to hedge your bet but you’re just being a bitch. Carry on.
    Ok wanna bet on what happens first? Obama or Hillary convicted of a crime or Barr is out of office?
    I have no illusions that Obama and Hillary will ever face charges. Politicians are simply held to a different standard and have protections we(?) don’t. I do believe there are a number of unelected bureaucrats that will see charges though, as well they should. Crooked IRS, FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc agents are more dangerous to the Republic than crooked politicians.
    So you are doing a victory lap over some lower level employees?
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    In reality, this “criminality” likely involves pretty small potato stuff, and was announced now to allow Daddy and the morons to engage in their typical false equivalence shtick.

    Using those famous minding reading skills again I see Kunt.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    34 indictments
    7 convictions so far

    You think Barr gets more?
    And not a one of them for colluding with the Russians in order to impact the 2016 election. And but for Manafort and Cohen all the other "convictions" were process crimes.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    You really got em now!!
    Oh, I see. I thought you were using a qualifier to hedge your bet but you’re just being a bitch. Carry on.
    Ok wanna bet on what happens first? Obama or Hillary convicted of a crime or Barr is out of office?
    I have no illusions that Obama and Hillary will ever face charges. Politicians are simply held to a different standard and have protections we(?) don’t. I do believe there are a number of unelected bureaucrats that will see charges though, as well they should. Crooked IRS, FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc agents are more dangerous to the Republic than crooked politicians.
    Slight correction. Rat party politicians are held to a different standard.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    In reality, this “criminality” likely involves pretty small potato stuff, and was announced now to allow Daddy and the morons to engage in their typical false equivalence shtick.

    You guys confessed

    I guess you didn't read the report

    Small potato stuff like having a plan B in case Trump gets elected and then using it after spying on his campaign and using a foreign government to help in the attempt

    Meanwhile three years in and you still got nothing
    More like Hillary's emails and Benghazi.
    You mean the Hillary emails that you claim she never lied to the American people about O'Keefed? Naaah, you're not a kneepadding bitch. And we've all seen how you'd never lie in order to advance your political agenda.

    Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.

    Police canceled the game.

    It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy.
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,804
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    When there are criminal convictions will you finally LEAVE?
    Hang on now, @Pawz: If Hondo left, who'd establish the left-most tail of the bell curve?
    I'm hearing the Russians are actively grooming @GDS for the role. Total asset.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    When there are criminal convictions will you finally LEAVE?
    Hang on now, @Pawz: If Hondo left, who'd establish the left-most tail of the bell curve?
    I'm hearing the Russians are actively grooming @GDS for the role. Total asset.
    The meltdown continues....
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    You really got em now!!
    Oh, I see. I thought you were using a qualifier to hedge your bet but you’re just being a bitch. Carry on.
    Ok wanna bet on what happens first? Obama or Hillary convicted of a crime or Barr is out of office?
    I have no illusions that Obama and Hillary will ever face charges. Politicians are simply held to a different standard and have protections we(?) don’t. I do believe there are a number of unelected bureaucrats that will see charges though, as well they should. Crooked IRS, FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc agents are more dangerous to the Republic than crooked politicians.
    So you are doing a victory lap over some lower level employees?
    Which is exactly what you do whenever you cite the number of "convictions" Mueller came up with. But when have you ever been bothered about being a hypocritical piece of shit.
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,804
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    GDS said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    When there are criminal convictions will you finally LEAVE?
    Hang on now, @Pawz: If Hondo left, who'd establish the left-most tail of the bell curve?
    I'm hearing the Russians are actively grooming @GDS for the role. Total asset.
    The meltdown continues....
    How so?
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,752
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    GDS said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    When there are criminal convictions will you finally LEAVE?
    Hang on now, @Pawz: If Hondo left, who'd establish the left-most tail of the bell curve?
    I'm hearing the Russians are actively grooming @GDS for the role. Total asset.
    The meltdown continues....
    Typical @GDS, hard at work, plagiarizing and parroting from his empty brain.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,752
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    34 indictments
    7 convictions so far

    You think Barr gets more?
    How many for collusion?

    I'll wait......
    Maybe you missed it in the report you didn’t read. There’s no legal definition of collusion which is precisely why Trump keeps pushing it out for you trumptards to parrot.
    Christ. I rest my fucking case. Is @GDS merely a copy-bot?
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    edited October 2019
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    You really got em now!!
    Oh, I see. I thought you were using a qualifier to hedge your bet but you’re just being a bitch. Carry on.
    Ok wanna bet on what happens first? Obama or Hillary convicted of a crime or Barr is out of office?
    I have no illusions that Obama and Hillary will ever face charges. Politicians are simply held to a different standard and have protections we(?) don’t. I do believe there are a number of unelected bureaucrats that will see charges though, as well they should. Crooked IRS, FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc agents are more dangerous to the Republic than crooked politicians.
    So you are doing a victory lap over some lower level employees?
    You sure like to project your feelings into other people’s posts. Show me where I’m taking a victory lap.

    Why is policing the bureaucrats a bad thing? Bad actors are bad actors. Anything they’d do to my side they’ll do to your side. They only have one side, their own. The rest of us are assets to be exploited or nuisances to be disposed of. I’ve seen first hand what people without constraints are capable of and it’s not pretty.
    Where do I say policing the bureaucrats is a bad thing? You bitch about projecting then the next paragraph you start but projecting.

    You guys have been crying for years about fisa abuse and Hillary and Obama going to jail for criminal activities. Now it's about bureaucrats. Moving the goal posts much?

    For the record, if they actual did obtain the FISA warrant improperly, take everyone down.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    You really got em now!!
    Oh, I see. I thought you were using a qualifier to hedge your bet but you’re just being a bitch. Carry on.
    Ok wanna bet on what happens first? Obama or Hillary convicted of a crime or Barr is out of office?
    I have no illusions that Obama and Hillary will ever face charges. Politicians are simply held to a different standard and have protections we(?) don’t. I do believe there are a number of unelected bureaucrats that will see charges though, as well they should. Crooked IRS, FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc agents are more dangerous to the Republic than crooked politicians.
    So you are doing a victory lap over some lower level employees?
    Which is exactly what you do whenever you cite the number of "convictions" Mueller came up with. But when have you ever been bothered about being a hypocritical piece of shit.
    You are moving the goal posts too. You've said for years Hillary and Obama's use of the FISA court was criminal. Not lower level employees. And.... The people taken down by the Mueller investigation were directly involved with Trump himself. Like his campaign manager. His attorney. Etc. You really think that's the same as people Obama and Hillary didn't even know?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,443
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. I'll need to bump this thread when Barr is gone and there's no criminal convictions from the pee tape episode.

    What about criminal convictions from the Russian election interference hoax?
    You really got em now!!
    Oh, I see. I thought you were using a qualifier to hedge your bet but you’re just being a bitch. Carry on.
    Ok wanna bet on what happens first? Obama or Hillary convicted of a crime or Barr is out of office?
    I have no illusions that Obama and Hillary will ever face charges. Politicians are simply held to a different standard and have protections we(?) don’t. I do believe there are a number of unelected bureaucrats that will see charges though, as well they should. Crooked IRS, FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc agents are more dangerous to the Republic than crooked politicians.
    So you are doing a victory lap over some lower level employees?
    Which is exactly what you do whenever you cite the number of "convictions" Mueller came up with. But when have you ever been bothered about being a hypocritical piece of shit.
    You are moving the goal posts too. You've said for years Hillary and Obama's use of the FISA court was criminal. Not lower level employees. And.... The people taken down by the Mueller investigation were directly involved with Trump himself. Like his campaign manager. His attorney. Etc. You really think that's the same as people Obama and Hillary didn't even know?
    Pathological liar
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,443
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Hondo meltdown is epic


    Tick tick tick
Sign In or Register to comment.