How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
So your solution is open borders?
no it's not but its also not to turn a blind eye to one of the worst refugee crises since WW2
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
So your solution is open borders?
no it's not but its also not to turn a blind eye to one of the worst refugee crises since WW2
So let's Topple Assad and see how that improves the situation, right?
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...
yet again proves why it's useless to post quotes or links.
Wrong. It's because you can't defend your posts or links, mostly because they don't say what you think they say.
So far in this thread you are parroting Dore and now Pawz. Get your head out of your ass and think for yourself fuckwit. If you want to counter any point I've made then do it.
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that?
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...
yet again proves why it's useless to post quotes or links.
Wrong. It's because you can't defend your posts or links, mostly because they don't say what you think they say.
So far in this thread you are parroting Dore and now Pawz. Get your head out of your ass and think for yourself fuckwit. If you want to counter any point I've made then do it.
No. The point of the video was to show how much like the NYT reporter you and others like you are, parroting others shit uncritically, and without the slightest independent thought. And it crucifies your type; the mindless uncritical sycophant of the Far Left who say and write things they don't even know the meaning of. That's you to a "T" - PostWhiteFlag@GDS.
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that?
Bullshit fuckwit. You've been wrong about the articles I read and the information I consume from the beginning of this thread and you're still wrong now. Admitting the fucking obvious which is that Assad is a murderer and a torturer isn't demanding shit, it's admitting a fact is a fact. Hearing Gabbard's own words isn't swallowing anyone's interpretation. Keep on obfuscating and spinning though fuckwit.
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
So your solution is open borders?
no it's not but its also not to turn a blind eye to one of the worst refugee crises since WW2
That is not our problem. Let the oil rich moslem countries in the Middle East like Saudi Arabia take care of their own.
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...
yet again proves why it's useless to post quotes or links.
Wrong. It's because you can't defend your posts or links, mostly because they don't say what you think they say.
So far in this thread you are parroting Dore and now Pawz. Get your head out of your ass and think for yourself fuckwit. If you want to counter any point I've made then do it.
No. The point of the video was to show how much like the NYT reporter you and others like you are, parroting others shit uncritically, and without the slightest independent thought. And it crucifies your type; the mindless uncritical sycophant of the Far Left who say and write things they don't even know the meaning of. That's you to a "T" - PostWhiteFlag@GDS.
Other than the fact I'm parroting Tulsi's own words you nailed it fuckwit.
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that?
Bullshit fuckwit. You've been wrong about the articles I read and the information I consume from the beginning of this thread and you're still wrong now. Admitting the fucking obvious which is that Assad is a murderer and a torturer isn't demanding shit, it's admitting a fact is a fact. Hearing Gabbard's own words isn't swallowing anyone's interpretation. Keep on obfuscating and spinning though fuckwit.
This logic, right here, is why you live in your mom's basement.
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that?
Bullshit fuckwit. You've been wrong about the articles I read and the information I consume from the beginning of this thread and you're still wrong now. Admitting the fucking obvious which is that Assad is a murderer and a torturer isn't demanding shit, it's admitting a fact is a fact. Hearing Gabbard's own words isn't swallowing anyone's interpretation. Keep on obfuscating and spinning though fuckwit.
This logic, right here, is why you live in your mom's basement.
You've been wrong from the beginning and you continue to show your ignorance but keep at it. This game is fun.
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.
Okay, once again, show me her actual words, asshole.
Or answer this question: Are ISIS fighters terrorists? Is Al Nusra aka Al Queda in Syria (Levant) a Terrorist Group?
Why won't you condemn ISIS and Al Queda as Terrorist groups, like Tulsi did?
Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that?
Bullshit fuckwit. You've been wrong about the articles I read and the information I consume from the beginning of this thread and you're still wrong now. Admitting the fucking obvious which is that Assad is a murderer and a torturer isn't demanding shit, it's admitting a fact is a fact. Hearing Gabbard's own words isn't swallowing anyone's interpretation. Keep on obfuscating and spinning though fuckwit.
This logic, right here, is why you live in your mom's basement.
You've been wrong from the beginning and you continue to show your ignorance but keep at it. This game is fun.
4 pages in and I've shown you more actual words Tulsi has spoken than you have shown me, despite being asked that one question all HondoBros fags hate: "Original source, please?"
Comments
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
Like you even have to ask.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that?
Or answer this question: Are ISIS fighters terrorists? Is Al Nusra aka Al Queda in Syria (Levant) a Terrorist Group?
Why won't you condemn ISIS and Al Queda as Terrorist groups, like Tulsi did?
Why do you have a soft spot for Terrorists?