Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The Dems don't fuck around...Watch out Tulsi!
Comments
-
Serious query: why does @GDS support endless regime change wars?
-
yet again proves why it's useless to post quotes or links.pawz said:
This doesn't prove what you think it proves.GDS said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democratspawz said:
{citation required}GDS said:
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...pawz said:
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.GDS said:
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Apparently the answer to my question is no. Thanks for answering the question dumbfuck.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Says the idiot who just went with a quadruple post....can you write a single post without projecting?TurdBomber said:
Meltdown in Progress.GDS said:
Your fucking google machine broken turd burglar? If it is then try gofuckyourself.com.TurdBomber said:
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
Tell us more about Russia, Hillary. -
So your solution is open borders?GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
-
So why did we leave Vietnam and abandon all those future refugees? Please run your world police candidate against Trump.
-
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS. -
Wrong. It's because you can't defend your posts or links, mostly because they don't say what you think they say.GDS said:
yet again proves why it's useless to post quotes or links.pawz said:
This doesn't prove what you think it proves.GDS said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democratspawz said:
{citation required}GDS said:
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...pawz said:
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.GDS said:
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Apparently the answer to my question is no. Thanks for answering the question dumbfuck.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Says the idiot who just went with a quadruple post....can you write a single post without projecting?TurdBomber said:
Meltdown in Progress.GDS said:
Your fucking google machine broken turd burglar? If it is then try gofuckyourself.com.TurdBomber said:
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
Tell us more about Russia, Hillary. -
no it's not but its also not to turn a blind eye to one of the worst refugee crises since WW2oregonblitzkrieg said:
So your solution is open borders?GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
-
So let's Topple Assad and see how that improves the situation, right?GDS said:
no it's not but its also not to turn a blind eye to one of the worst refugee crises since WW2oregonblitzkrieg said:
So your solution is open borders?GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
-
So far in this thread you are parroting Dore and now Pawz. Get your head out of your ass and think for yourself fuckwit. If you want to counter any point I've made then do it.TurdBomber said:
Wrong. It's because you can't defend your posts or links, mostly because they don't say what you think they say.GDS said:
yet again proves why it's useless to post quotes or links.pawz said:
This doesn't prove what you think it proves.GDS said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democratspawz said:
{citation required}GDS said:
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...pawz said:
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.GDS said:
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Apparently the answer to my question is no. Thanks for answering the question dumbfuck.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Says the idiot who just went with a quadruple post....can you write a single post without projecting?TurdBomber said:
Meltdown in Progress.GDS said:
Your fucking google machine broken turd burglar? If it is then try gofuckyourself.com.TurdBomber said:
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
Tell us more about Russia, Hillary. -
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS. -
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that? -
No. The point of the video was to show how much like the NYT reporter you and others like you are, parroting others shit uncritically, and without the slightest independent thought. And it crucifies your type; the mindless uncritical sycophant of the Far Left who say and write things they don't even know the meaning of. That's you to a "T" - PostWhiteFlag@GDS.GDS said:
So far in this thread you are parroting Dore and now Pawz. Get your head out of your ass and think for yourself fuckwit. If you want to counter any point I've made then do it.TurdBomber said:
Wrong. It's because you can't defend your posts or links, mostly because they don't say what you think they say.GDS said:
yet again proves why it's useless to post quotes or links.pawz said:
This doesn't prove what you think it proves.GDS said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democratspawz said:
{citation required}GDS said:
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...pawz said:
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.GDS said:
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Apparently the answer to my question is no. Thanks for answering the question dumbfuck.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Says the idiot who just went with a quadruple post....can you write a single post without projecting?TurdBomber said:
Meltdown in Progress.GDS said:
Your fucking google machine broken turd burglar? If it is then try gofuckyourself.com.TurdBomber said:
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
Tell us more about Russia, Hillary. -
Bullshit fuckwit. You've been wrong about the articles I read and the information I consume from the beginning of this thread and you're still wrong now. Admitting the fucking obvious which is that Assad is a murderer and a torturer isn't demanding shit, it's admitting a fact is a fact. Hearing Gabbard's own words isn't swallowing anyone's interpretation. Keep on obfuscating and spinning though fuckwit.TurdBomber said:
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that? -
That is not our problem. Let the oil rich moslem countries in the Middle East like Saudi Arabia take care of their own.GDS said:
no it's not but its also not to turn a blind eye to one of the worst refugee crises since WW2oregonblitzkrieg said:
So your solution is open borders?GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
-
Other than the fact I'm parroting Tulsi's own words you nailed it fuckwit.TurdBomber said:
No. The point of the video was to show how much like the NYT reporter you and others like you are, parroting others shit uncritically, and without the slightest independent thought. And it crucifies your type; the mindless uncritical sycophant of the Far Left who say and write things they don't even know the meaning of. That's you to a "T" - PostWhiteFlag@GDS.GDS said:
So far in this thread you are parroting Dore and now Pawz. Get your head out of your ass and think for yourself fuckwit. If you want to counter any point I've made then do it.TurdBomber said:
Wrong. It's because you can't defend your posts or links, mostly because they don't say what you think they say.GDS said:
yet again proves why it's useless to post quotes or links.pawz said:
This doesn't prove what you think it proves.GDS said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democratspawz said:
{citation required}GDS said:
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...pawz said:
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.GDS said:
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Apparently the answer to my question is no. Thanks for answering the question dumbfuck.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Says the idiot who just went with a quadruple post....can you write a single post without projecting?TurdBomber said:
Meltdown in Progress.GDS said:
Your fucking google machine broken turd burglar? If it is then try gofuckyourself.com.TurdBomber said:
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
Tell us more about Russia, Hillary. -
This logic, right here, is why you live in your mom's basement.GDS said:
Bullshit fuckwit. You've been wrong about the articles I read and the information I consume from the beginning of this thread and you're still wrong now. Admitting the fucking obvious which is that Assad is a murderer and a torturer isn't demanding shit, it's admitting a fact is a fact. Hearing Gabbard's own words isn't swallowing anyone's interpretation. Keep on obfuscating and spinning though fuckwit.TurdBomber said:
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that? -
You've been wrong from the beginning and you continue to show your ignorance but keep at it. This game is fun.TurdBomber said:
This logic, right here, is why you live in your mom's basement.GDS said:
Bullshit fuckwit. You've been wrong about the articles I read and the information I consume from the beginning of this thread and you're still wrong now. Admitting the fucking obvious which is that Assad is a murderer and a torturer isn't demanding shit, it's admitting a fact is a fact. Hearing Gabbard's own words isn't swallowing anyone's interpretation. Keep on obfuscating and spinning though fuckwit.TurdBomber said:
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that? -
Okay, once again, show me her actual words, asshole.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
Or answer this question: Are ISIS fighters terrorists? Is Al Nusra aka Al Queda in Syria (Levant) a Terrorist Group?
Why won't you condemn ISIS and Al Queda as Terrorist groups, like Tulsi did?
Why do you have a soft spot for Terrorists? -
4 pages in and I've shown you more actual words Tulsi has spoken than you have shown me, despite being asked that one question all HondoBros fags hate: "Original source, please?"GDS said:
You've been wrong from the beginning and you continue to show your ignorance but keep at it. This game is fun.TurdBomber said:
This logic, right here, is why you live in your mom's basement.GDS said:
Bullshit fuckwit. You've been wrong about the articles I read and the information I consume from the beginning of this thread and you're still wrong now. Admitting the fucking obvious which is that Assad is a murderer and a torturer isn't demanding shit, it's admitting a fact is a fact. Hearing Gabbard's own words isn't swallowing anyone's interpretation. Keep on obfuscating and spinning though fuckwit.TurdBomber said:
I know precisely and exactly the tweets and articles you are getting your information from, and once again, you are swallowing the MSM's interpretation hook, line, and sinker, uncritically and sycophantically. The old "Will You Condemn" game is pure sophistry and no, a politician who's contemplating engaging with a rival leader in hopes of ending a war is not going to shit all over that possibility by condemning the other leader before, or during, peace talks.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
You can demand that shit when you win a war and the opposition has surrendered. But what the fuck would a MSM Cuck like you know about that? -
of course they are fucking terrorists. Hence our support for the YPGTurdBomber said:
Okay, once again, show me her actual words, asshole.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
Or answer this question: Are ISIS fighters terrorists? Is Al Nusra aka Al Queda in Syria (Levant) a Terrorist Group?
Why won't you condemn ISIS and Al Queda as Terrorist groups, like Tulsi did?
Why do you have a soft spot for Terrorists? -
Then why do you object to Tulsi calling them Terrorists? (Pro-Tip: She tweeted it.)GDS said:
of course they are fucking terrorists. Hence our support for the YPGTurdBomber said:
Okay, once again, show me her actual words, asshole.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
Or answer this question: Are ISIS fighters terrorists? Is Al Nusra aka Al Queda in Syria (Levant) a Terrorist Group?
Why won't you condemn ISIS and Al Queda as Terrorist groups, like Tulsi did?
Why do you have a soft spot for Terrorists? -
Or maybe you just get tired of hoisting yourself on your own petard.GDS said:
yet again proves why it's useless to post quotes or links.pawz said:
This doesn't prove what you think it proves.GDS said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democratspawz said:
{citation required}GDS said:
An unannounced trip that was privately funded by an Assad friendly group where she didn't disclose in advance her meeting with Assad...ya nothing secret about that. Turd Burglar appreciates the help though...pawz said:
I don't think 'secretly' means what you think it means.GDS said:
Why should I spend my time to go back and produce something you will spin and obfuscate on anyway? Here's one of the many many many instances when given the opportunity to denounce the dictator she secretly met with and was led around on an Assad approved tour of Syria yet somehow fails.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Apparently the answer to my question is no. Thanks for answering the question dumbfuck.TurdBomber said:
@GDSLyingPussyCuck Meltdown Continues....GDS said:
Says the idiot who just went with a quadruple post....can you write a single post without projecting?TurdBomber said:
Meltdown in Progress.GDS said:
Your fucking google machine broken turd burglar? If it is then try gofuckyourself.com.TurdBomber said:
How about producing Tulsi's Actual Words, Asshole? Why is that so hard for you HondoBros to muster? Is it because it didn't happen?
Or is it because you're all a bunch of lightweight MSM Fellating Cucks? Well, have it your way, white-flag surrender-monkey.
@GDS: Another HondoBros that won't because he can't. Rings true, as usual.
“Do you consider him a torturer and murderer?” Cooper asked next.
“That’s not what this is about,” Gabbard said. “I don’t defend or apologize or have anything to do with what he has done to his own people.”
Gabbard continued by noting how former U.S. presidents worked with authoritarian leaders in the past when necessary, and saying the attacks on her record with Assad are “distractions away from the central issue.”
It's a simple question where the answer is yes.
Now take a cue from Tulsi and continue to obfuscate and spin for her multitude of statements which shows she for some odd reason has a nice warm tight soft spot for Assad.
As such, I didn't read past that.
You sound like an establishment shill. HondoFS sheds a proud tear.
Tell us more about Russia, Hillary.
-
Or to speak to Throbber in his own language, check out those Petards. -
When did you stop beating your wife fuckwit?TurdBomber said:
Then why do you object to Tulsi calling them Terrorists? (Pro-Tip: She tweeted it.)GDS said:
of course they are fucking terrorists. Hence our support for the YPGTurdBomber said:
Okay, once again, show me her actual words, asshole.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
Or answer this question: Are ISIS fighters terrorists? Is Al Nusra aka Al Queda in Syria (Levant) a Terrorist Group?
Why won't you condemn ISIS and Al Queda as Terrorist groups, like Tulsi did?
Why do you have a soft spot for Terrorists?
After Tulsi returned from her Assad meeting and her tour meeting Assad approved people in Assad approved places she wrote that "In 2012, the United States began a covert military campaign to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad in alliance with Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, and Turkey. As a result of that regime change war, more than 400,000 Syrians have been killed and millions have fled their homes as refugees." Again - she is parroting Assad talking points. The Syrian civil war is a result of Assad brutally cracking down on protests calling for democratic reforms and that crackdown included torturing his own citizens and gassing them led to the rise of ISIS in Syria and Al Nusra. To try and spin his war crimes as due to US policy is fucking bullshit.
She criticized Trump firing missiles at Syrian airbases as "strengthening of terrorists". Again - parroting Assad talking points.
If she doesn't want to be accused of having a soft spot for Assad then she should stop parroting his talking points.
-
In other words, she agrees with the fact that Hussein Obama and his secretary of state, warmonger Hillary Clinton, played a key role in fomenting the Syrian war. The same people who toppled Quaddafi. Sounds about right to me. They were just continuing the same policies of convicted war criminal W Bush, and Clinton and the other Bush before him.GDS said:
When did you stop beating your wife fuckwit?TurdBomber said:
Then why do you object to Tulsi calling them Terrorists? (Pro-Tip: She tweeted it.)GDS said:
of course they are fucking terrorists. Hence our support for the YPGTurdBomber said:
Okay, once again, show me her actual words, asshole.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
Or answer this question: Are ISIS fighters terrorists? Is Al Nusra aka Al Queda in Syria (Levant) a Terrorist Group?
Why won't you condemn ISIS and Al Queda as Terrorist groups, like Tulsi did?
Why do you have a soft spot for Terrorists?
After Tulsi returned from her Assad meeting and her tour meeting Assad approved people in Assad approved places she wrote that "In 2012, the United States began a covert military campaign to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad in alliance with Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, and Turkey. As a result of that regime change war, more than 400,000 Syrians have been killed and millions have fled their homes as refugees." Again - she is parroting Assad talking points. The Syrian civil war is a result of Assad brutally cracking down on protests calling for democratic reforms and that crackdown included torturing his own citizens and gassing them led to the rise of ISIS in Syria and Al Nusra. To try and spin his war crimes as due to US policy is fucking bullshit.
She criticized Trump firing missiles at Syrian airbases as "strengthening of terrorists". Again - parroting Assad talking points.
If she doesn't want to be accused of having a soft spot for Assad then she should stop parroting his talking points.
Sounds like she has a lot of common sense. -
I'll happily turn a blind eye. The blinder the eye and less we have to do with it the betterGDS said:
no it's not but its also not to turn a blind eye to one of the worst refugee crises since WW2oregonblitzkrieg said:
So your solution is open borders?GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
-
You are really fucked up 6 ways from Sunday, aren't you? Your shotgunned facts notwithstanding, your only consistency is attacking Tulsi and apparently wanting the US to redouble its efforts to depose Assad. Is that what you want? If so, explain to me how that serves US interests?GDS said:
When did you stop beating your wife fuckwit?TurdBomber said:
Then why do you object to Tulsi calling them Terrorists? (Pro-Tip: She tweeted it.)GDS said:
of course they are fucking terrorists. Hence our support for the YPGTurdBomber said:
Okay, once again, show me her actual words, asshole.GDS said:
and her conversation starts by calling the the groups we partnered with terrorists and claiming that the people of Syria she talked to during her Assad dictated tour want Assad as president while being unwilling to answer the question of if Assad is a murder and torturer with a simple yes...Assad talking points.TurdBomber said:
“Whatever you think of President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Gabbard said. “In order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him.”GDS said:
The Syrian civil war has created almost 7 million refugees that have fled Syria and another 6 million that are internally displaced. If we don't want to continue to take in ourselves or at a minimum help support those housing them elsewhere then it would behoove us to help find a solution for them to return.oregonblitzkrieg said:Why is it a bad thing to let the Russians prop up Assad? Toppling Hussein made things worse. Toppling Quadaffi made things worse. Toppling Assad will make things worse.
You're boxed-in, PostWhiteFlagGDS.
Or answer this question: Are ISIS fighters terrorists? Is Al Nusra aka Al Queda in Syria (Levant) a Terrorist Group?
Why won't you condemn ISIS and Al Queda as Terrorist groups, like Tulsi did?
Why do you have a soft spot for Terrorists?
After Tulsi returned from her Assad meeting and her tour meeting Assad approved people in Assad approved places she wrote that "In 2012, the United States began a covert military campaign to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad in alliance with Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, and Turkey. As a result of that regime change war, more than 400,000 Syrians have been killed and millions have fled their homes as refugees." Again - she is parroting Assad talking points. The Syrian civil war is a result of Assad brutally cracking down on protests calling for democratic reforms and that crackdown included torturing his own citizens and gassing them led to the rise of ISIS in Syria and Al Nusra. To try and spin his war crimes as due to US policy is fucking bullshit.
She criticized Trump firing missiles at Syrian airbases as "strengthening of terrorists". Again - parroting Assad talking points.
If she doesn't want to be accused of having a soft spot for Assad then she should stop parroting his talking points.
By your illogic, any single step or comment Tulsi makes toward ending the conflict is capitulating to Assad's regime, demonstrating a soft spot, etc.
And does weakening Syrian defenses by aerial bombardment strengthen or weaken the groups the regime was fighting against?
What you and your ilk you parrot like to call "Assad Talking Points" just so happen to be what the rest of the world calls "Facts." -
So now that we've established that Tulsi was 100% correct on all points, including that that US arms, money and supplies were winding up in the hands of terrorist groups that she correctly called "Terrorists" - "Of course" according to PostWhiteFlag@GDS - and bombing the Syrian airbases helped those terrorist groups by weakening Syrian defenses, which PostWhiteFlag@GDS refers to as Assad Talking Points, which are also known as "Facts," I guess we can call it a day.
Is that about it, PostWhiteFlag@GDS? Anything else you wish to add?
Seems to me you've done a spectacular job of acquitting Tulsi of everything you attacked her for, while enthusiastically parroting left-wing MSM pro-war talking points and outright lies about what Gabbard ever said or did with regards to Syria.
Put some ice on it, youngster. It's gonna be a long year for you. -
Meltdown of the year. It’s not even close.TurdBomber said:So now that we've established that Tulsi was 100% correct on all points, including that that US arms, money and supplies were winding up in the hands of terrorist groups that she correctly called "Terrorists" - "Of course" according to PostWhiteFlag@GDS - and bombing the Syrian airbases helped those terrorist groups by weakening Syrian defenses, which PostWhiteFlag@GDS refers to as Assad Talking Points, which are also known as "Facts," I guess we can call it a day.
Is that about it, PostWhiteFlag@GDS? Anything else you wish to add?
Seems to me you've done a spectacular job of acquitting Tulsi of everything you attacked her for, while enthusiastically parroting left-wing MSM pro-war talking points and outright lies about what Gabbard ever said or did with regards to Syria.
Put some ice on it, youngster. It's gonna be a long year for you.
I had to let it play out over the day, but now it’s done.
J F C
Of all time.
