Article on Hunter
Comments
-
What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )
Nothing to see here. Probably legal.
This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down. -
Again. Your news source is feeding you bullshit and you don't even know it.DoogieMcDoogerson said:What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )
Nothing to see here. Probably legal.
This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down. -
Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.DoogieMcDoogerson said:What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )
Nothing to see here. Probably legal.
This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.
-
Did I say anything that wasn't factual?
Facts
Biden bragged about withholding funds from Ukraine until they fired prosecutor. FACT.
Prosecutor was corrupt. Also a FACT.
Prosecutor was investigating Burisma, when Joe's son hunter worked at the time. FACT.
"Oh but the investigator was a bad corrupt person..."
Nice rebuttal.2001400ex said:
Again. Your news source is feeding you bullshit and you don't even know it.DoogieMcDoogerson said:What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )
Nothing to see here. Probably legal.
This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down. -
So you don't believe 'Ol Joe huh. You've seen him confess.GDS said:
Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.DoogieMcDoogerson said:What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )
Nothing to see here. Probably legal.
This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down. -
I believe Joe when he says he told Ukrainian officials during a December visit they should get rid of a corrupt prosecutor consistent with US, EU, IMF, foreign investors and Ukraine anti corruption experts policy. I don’t believe that by March when the Ukrainian parliament actually voted to fire him Joe’s words 4 months earlier had much of an impact. I doubt many of the members of the Ukrainian parliament knew about Joes comments when they went to vote 4 months later.Sledog said:
So you don't believe 'Ol Joe huh. You've seen him confess.GDS said:
Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.DoogieMcDoogerson said:What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )
Nothing to see here. Probably legal.
This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.
-
But you don't know nor do we know what else was communicated. Obviously needs a huge investigation into Obama's massively corrupt administration and their pay for play scheme.GDS said:
I believe Joe when he says he told Ukrainian officials during a December visit they should get rid of a corrupt prosecutor consistent with US, EU, IMF, foreign investors and Ukraine anti corruption experts policy. I don’t believe that by March when the Ukrainian parliament actually voted to fire him Joe’s words 4 months earlier had much of an impact. I doubt many of the members of the Ukrainian parliament knew about Joes comments when they went to vote 4 months later.Sledog said:
So you don't believe 'Ol Joe huh. You've seen him confess.GDS said:
Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.DoogieMcDoogerson said:What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )
Nothing to see here. Probably legal.
This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down. -
FFS scotti, fucking educate yourself before you fill these pages up with your bullshit. The Ukrainians replaced the "corrupt" prosecutor with another prosecutor who was actually ALREADY under investigation for corruption and indeed was corrupt as hell.GDS said:
I believe Joe when he says he told Ukrainian officials during a December visit they should get rid of a corrupt prosecutor consistent with US, EU, IMF, foreign investors and Ukraine anti corruption experts policy. I don’t believe that by March when the Ukrainian parliament actually voted to fire him Joe’s words 4 months earlier had much of an impact. I doubt many of the members of the Ukrainian parliament knew about Joes comments when they went to vote 4 months later.Sledog said:
So you don't believe 'Ol Joe huh. You've seen him confess.GDS said:
Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.DoogieMcDoogerson said:What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )
Nothing to see here. Probably legal.
This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.
I get it, you and your fellow libs on here want Trump impeached because your side lost the election and you would like nothing more than to illegally take away my vote. At least try to not look so fucking stupid doing it.
Virtually everything that you libs have accused Trump of doing, you libs have actually already done. From colluding with russia, to threatening Ukraine by withholding billions if they didn't stop investigating Bidens coke addicted son. The best defense is a good offense, we get it. you will never investigate yourselves because you are as corrupt as shit but again, don't look so fucking stupid and hypocritical in the process, it just wastes everyone's time. -
Hahaha classic Atl post. A long diatribe full of emoting that doesn’t counter a single word I’ve written then throw in a couple of lies to top it off. Seek help Atl. The Trumptard meltdown as we get closer to impeachment is real.
-
