Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Article on Hunter

2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
in Tug Tavern
Like I've said, there was some shady shit with the Bidens. But not illegal. There's a difference some of you don't understand.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/14/hunter-bidens-ukraine-china-deals-were-probably-legal-and-thats-the-problem.html
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,085
    2001400ex said:

    Like I've said, there was some shady shit with the Bidens. But not illegal. There's a difference some of you don't understand.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/14/hunter-bidens-ukraine-china-deals-were-probably-legal-and-thats-the-problem.html

    Create a strawman and fuck it right in the ass. Where have I said what Joe and Hunter were doing was illegal my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend? We're being told that the story isn't even true and that it's an unproven conspiracy theory. Hell you just dismissed someone being paid $720K a year for a job where they do no work and they never show up for.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club
    Probably legal

    After three years of non stop accusations against Trump we settle on probably legal for a standard
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    Probably legal

    After three years of non stop accusations against Trump we settle on probably legal for a standard

    Why would you investigate something that's legal?

    The larger issue is, why don't we fix this bullshit that both sides do?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,085
    Talking with Russians about dirt on Hillary isn't illegal and that alone was reason enough for you to want to remove Trump from office Hondo.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Probably legal

    After three years of non stop accusations against Trump we settle on probably legal for a standard

    Why would you investigate something that's legal?

    The larger issue is, why don't we fix this bullshit that both sides do?
    Fuck your both sides bullshit bitch
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,085
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Probably legal

    After three years of non stop accusations against Trump we settle on probably legal for a standard

    Why would you investigate something that's legal?

    The larger issue is, why don't we fix this bullshit that both sides do?

    What a fucking hack.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Probably legal

    After three years of non stop accusations against Trump we settle on probably legal for a standard

    Why would you investigate something that's legal?

    The larger issue is, why don't we fix this bullshit that both sides do?
    Fuck your both sides bullshit bitch
    Are you saying Republicans don't use their political position for personal gain? Ok!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,085
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Probably legal

    After three years of non stop accusations against Trump we settle on probably legal for a standard

    Why would you investigate something that's legal?

    The larger issue is, why don't we fix this bullshit that both sides do?
    Fuck your both sides bullshit bitch
    Are you saying Republicans don't use their political position for personal gain? Ok!
    Are you fucking strawman ass because you're a lightweight and a dipshit?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Probably legal

    After three years of non stop accusations against Trump we settle on probably legal for a standard

    Why would you investigate something that's legal?

    The larger issue is, why don't we fix this bullshit that both sides do?
    Fuck your both sides bullshit bitch
    Are you saying Republicans don't use their political position for personal gain? Ok!
    ButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbutButbutbutbutbutbuRepublicans!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,472 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    Joe didn't want that 900K lobbying money getting stopped by that prosecutor.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,495
    What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )

    Nothing to see here. Probably legal.

    This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )

    Nothing to see here. Probably legal.

    This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.

    Again. Your news source is feeding you bullshit and you don't even know it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )

    Nothing to see here. Probably legal.

    This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.

    Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,495
    Did I say anything that wasn't factual?

    Facts
    Biden bragged about withholding funds from Ukraine until they fired prosecutor. FACT.
    Prosecutor was corrupt. Also a FACT.
    Prosecutor was investigating Burisma, when Joe's son hunter worked at the time. FACT.

    "Oh but the investigator was a bad corrupt person..."

    Nice rebuttal.
    2001400ex said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )

    Nothing to see here. Probably legal.

    This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.

    Again. Your news source is feeding you bullshit and you don't even know it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,472 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )

    Nothing to see here. Probably legal.

    This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.

    Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.

    So you don't believe 'Ol Joe huh. You've seen him confess.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )

    Nothing to see here. Probably legal.

    This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.

    Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.

    So you don't believe 'Ol Joe huh. You've seen him confess.
    I believe Joe when he says he told Ukrainian officials during a December visit they should get rid of a corrupt prosecutor consistent with US, EU, IMF, foreign investors and Ukraine anti corruption experts policy. I don’t believe that by March when the Ukrainian parliament actually voted to fire him Joe’s words 4 months earlier had much of an impact. I doubt many of the members of the Ukrainian parliament knew about Joes comments when they went to vote 4 months later.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,472 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )

    Nothing to see here. Probably legal.

    This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.

    Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.

    So you don't believe 'Ol Joe huh. You've seen him confess.
    I believe Joe when he says he told Ukrainian officials during a December visit they should get rid of a corrupt prosecutor consistent with US, EU, IMF, foreign investors and Ukraine anti corruption experts policy. I don’t believe that by March when the Ukrainian parliament actually voted to fire him Joe’s words 4 months earlier had much of an impact. I doubt many of the members of the Ukrainian parliament knew about Joes comments when they went to vote 4 months later.
    But you don't know nor do we know what else was communicated. Obviously needs a huge investigation into Obama's massively corrupt administration and their pay for play scheme.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,188 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    What about Biden forcing the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor or they won't get US funs when his son is employed by the company being investigated? Probably legal? ( don't hit me with the - he was a corrupt prosecutor nonsense. This is the fucking Ukraine, man. )

    Nothing to see here. Probably legal.

    This is all fucked. Maybe we should call offsetting penalties and replay the down.

    Biden didn’t force the Ukrainian parliament to vote overwhelmingly to sack a corrupt prosecutor they did that on their own. In part, because the investigation into Burisma had gone dormant. Shokin’s subordinates were found with troves of cash and diamonds from all the bribes they were taking from oligarchs. Yet another reason why he was voted out overwhelmingly by parliament.

    So you don't believe 'Ol Joe huh. You've seen him confess.
    I believe Joe when he says he told Ukrainian officials during a December visit they should get rid of a corrupt prosecutor consistent with US, EU, IMF, foreign investors and Ukraine anti corruption experts policy. I don’t believe that by March when the Ukrainian parliament actually voted to fire him Joe’s words 4 months earlier had much of an impact. I doubt many of the members of the Ukrainian parliament knew about Joes comments when they went to vote 4 months later.
    FFS scotti, fucking educate yourself before you fill these pages up with your bullshit. The Ukrainians replaced the "corrupt" prosecutor with another prosecutor who was actually ALREADY under investigation for corruption and indeed was corrupt as hell.

    I get it, you and your fellow libs on here want Trump impeached because your side lost the election and you would like nothing more than to illegally take away my vote. At least try to not look so fucking stupid doing it.

    Virtually everything that you libs have accused Trump of doing, you libs have actually already done. From colluding with russia, to threatening Ukraine by withholding billions if they didn't stop investigating Bidens coke addicted son. The best defense is a good offense, we get it. you will never investigate yourselves because you are as corrupt as shit but again, don't look so fucking stupid and hypocritical in the process, it just wastes everyone's time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Hahaha classic Atl post. A long diatribe full of emoting that doesn’t counter a single word I’ve written then throw in a couple of lies to top it off. Seek help Atl. The Trumptard meltdown as we get closer to impeachment is real.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,472 Standard Supporter
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.