Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Tlaib says Democrats have discussed detaining White House officials who don't testify
Comments
-
Bullshit. You're too stupid to know what's funny and what's not.2001400ex said:
It's amazing how angry you are and you still have no clue how idiotic you sound. I got a chuckle so thank you for that.TurdBomber said:
So is it a language barrier or just plain retardation that's got ahold of you, Hondo. Or both.2001400ex said:
You are as dumb as Bob. Yes I know how the process works. However. Pointing out that someone who got 3.7 million more votes as stealing the nomination is fucktarded. You have to be smarter than that.TurdBomber said:
You're actually arguing she won the Democratic "Nomination" by 3.7 million "popular" votes. Um, not sure what country you live in, but that's not how it works, dummy.2001400ex said:
Huh? The discussion was for the Democratic nomination. Not the presidential election. And my link was for the same. It appears you are the confused one. How do you feel about being dumber than a burger flipper?TurdBomber said:
"Nomination" versus "Election."2001400ex said:
I'm fully aware that you can read on the internet people saying she stole the nomination. Hellobeatiful.com is actually my favorite source. That being said, she won by 3.7 million votes. How is that stealing?TurdBomber said:
Here are some HondoLINKS?? you can educate yourself with. Then again, what would Donna Brazille know, right? She was only the DNC Chairman in 2016.2001400ex said:
How fucking dumb can you be? Also noticed genius sledog voted this post up. Hillary had way more votes than Bernie. I'm not sure you call that stealing. However, if you still think that's stealing the nomination, I'm curious your thoughts on the electoral college as it relates to Trump's election.TurdBomber said:
A bigger threat than, say, surreptitiously stealing the Democratic Nomination from Bernie Sanders in 2016?TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/dnc-rigged-stole-election-from-bernie-sanders/
https://www.newsweek.com/clinton-robbed-sanders-dnc-brazile-699421
https://hellobeautiful.com/2966184/donna-brazile-g-hillary-clinton-robbed-bernie-sanders-of-the-democratic-nomination/
https://www.rt.com/usa/373272-clinton-sanders-hacking-evidence/
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/how-hillary-clinton-rigged-the-democratic-primary-and-may-have-broken-the-law/
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries
@Hondo cannot distinguish one from the other. I now understand the hamburger-flipper occupation thing much better.
The "election" popular vote tally of plus 3.7 million is what you keep conflating and referring to.
The Democratic "nomination" process requires around 2500 "delegates," (not voters) to win.
From square one, I posited that HRC and the DNC stole the "NOMINATION" from Bernie, you ILLITERATE FUCK!
What happened in the "General Presidential Election" has nothing to do with the Democratic Party Nomination process.
So, you can shove your 3.7 million votes up your stupid, illiterate burger-flipping ass, you annoying useless fucking twit.
And everyone on these boreds know it. -
*knowsTurdBomber said:
Bullshit. You're too stupid to know what's funny and what's not.2001400ex said:
It's amazing how angry you are and you still have no clue how idiotic you sound. I got a chuckle so thank you for that.TurdBomber said:
So is it a language barrier or just plain retardation that's got ahold of you, Hondo. Or both.2001400ex said:
You are as dumb as Bob. Yes I know how the process works. However. Pointing out that someone who got 3.7 million more votes as stealing the nomination is fucktarded. You have to be smarter than that.TurdBomber said:
You're actually arguing she won the Democratic "Nomination" by 3.7 million "popular" votes. Um, not sure what country you live in, but that's not how it works, dummy.2001400ex said:
Huh? The discussion was for the Democratic nomination. Not the presidential election. And my link was for the same. It appears you are the confused one. How do you feel about being dumber than a burger flipper?TurdBomber said:
"Nomination" versus "Election."2001400ex said:
I'm fully aware that you can read on the internet people saying she stole the nomination. Hellobeatiful.com is actually my favorite source. That being said, she won by 3.7 million votes. How is that stealing?TurdBomber said:
Here are some HondoLINKS?? you can educate yourself with. Then again, what would Donna Brazille know, right? She was only the DNC Chairman in 2016.2001400ex said:
How fucking dumb can you be? Also noticed genius sledog voted this post up. Hillary had way more votes than Bernie. I'm not sure you call that stealing. However, if you still think that's stealing the nomination, I'm curious your thoughts on the electoral college as it relates to Trump's election.TurdBomber said:
A bigger threat than, say, surreptitiously stealing the Democratic Nomination from Bernie Sanders in 2016?TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/dnc-rigged-stole-election-from-bernie-sanders/
https://www.newsweek.com/clinton-robbed-sanders-dnc-brazile-699421
https://hellobeautiful.com/2966184/donna-brazile-g-hillary-clinton-robbed-bernie-sanders-of-the-democratic-nomination/
https://www.rt.com/usa/373272-clinton-sanders-hacking-evidence/
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/how-hillary-clinton-rigged-the-democratic-primary-and-may-have-broken-the-law/
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries
@Hondo cannot distinguish one from the other. I now understand the hamburger-flipper occupation thing much better.
The "election" popular vote tally of plus 3.7 million is what you keep conflating and referring to.
The Democratic "nomination" process requires around 2500 "delegates," (not voters) to win.
From square one, I posited that HRC and the DNC stole the "NOMINATION" from Bernie, you ILLITERATE FUCK!
What happened in the "General Presidential Election" has nothing to do with the Democratic Party Nomination process.
So, you can shove your 3.7 million votes up your stupid, illiterate burger-flipping ass, you annoying useless fucking twit.
And everyone on these boreds know it.
