Tlaib says Democrats have discussed detaining White House officials who don't testify
Comments
-
BullshitGDS said:
The administration claimed executive privilege. The case eventually went to court and the administration had to turn over most of the records. I agree with you that was a case of stonewalling and it took time but eventually the rule of law won out.RaceBannon said:GDS said:
So you consider it TDS to expect Trump officials to abide by congressional subpoenas because you think the past 3 presidential administrations have avoided accountability. Yet you can’t point to previous instances of administration officials wholesale refusal to testify when subpoenaed...maybe I should have just gone with calling your argument retarded like the previous poster...PurpleThrobber said:
But but....in reverse.GDS said:Wh
Were there Obama officials that refused congressional subpoena?PurpleThrobber said:
jesus.TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
Did you miss the last 20 years of executive orders and various other bullshit?
and NOW you want accountability?
TDS, indeed, fren.
Nice work.
-
The rule of law did not win out. A scheme committed specifically to blame American gun owners for the problem it created in an attempt to sway public opinion so more gun control could be enacted. People died from those guns including Brain Terry a US Border Patrol agent.GDS said:
The administration claimed executive privilege. The case eventually went to court and the administration had to turn over most of the records. I agree with you that was a case of stonewalling and it took time but eventually the rule of law won out.RaceBannon said:GDS said:
So you consider it TDS to expect Trump officials to abide by congressional subpoenas because you think the past 3 presidential administrations have avoided accountability. Yet you can’t point to previous instances of administration officials wholesale refusal to testify when subpoenaed...maybe I should have just gone with calling your argument retarded like the previous poster...PurpleThrobber said:
But but....in reverse.GDS said:Wh
Were there Obama officials that refused congressional subpoena?PurpleThrobber said:
jesus.TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
Did you miss the last 20 years of executive orders and various other bullshit?
and NOW you want accountability?
TDS, indeed, fren.
Nice work.
-
So, your argument is basically because Bush committed war crimes, Trump can do whatever he wants.PurpleThrobber said:
You don't understan maff? 20 years goes way past Obama.TheKobeStopper said:
Take your retard argument to someone that actually supported Obama.PurpleThrobber said:
jesus.TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
Did you miss the last 20 years of executive orders and various other bullshit?
and NOW you want accountability?
TDS, indeed, fren.
If you want to be an anarchist, cool. Stop hiding like a coward behind faux centrist both sides are so bad edgy bullshit. -
compelling argumentRaceBannon said:
BullshitGDS said:
The administration claimed executive privilege. The case eventually went to court and the administration had to turn over most of the records. I agree with you that was a case of stonewalling and it took time but eventually the rule of law won out.RaceBannon said:GDS said:
So you consider it TDS to expect Trump officials to abide by congressional subpoenas because you think the past 3 presidential administrations have avoided accountability. Yet you can’t point to previous instances of administration officials wholesale refusal to testify when subpoenaed...maybe I should have just gone with calling your argument retarded like the previous poster...PurpleThrobber said:
But but....in reverse.GDS said:Wh
Were there Obama officials that refused congressional subpoena?PurpleThrobber said:
jesus.TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
Did you miss the last 20 years of executive orders and various other bullshit?
and NOW you want accountability?
TDS, indeed, fren.
Nice work. -
It’s actually one of the better arguments he’s put together as of late. Father Time remains undefeated.GDS said:
compelling argumentRaceBannon said:
BullshitGDS said:
The administration claimed executive privilege. The case eventually went to court and the administration had to turn over most of the records. I agree with you that was a case of stonewalling and it took time but eventually the rule of law won out.RaceBannon said:GDS said:
So you consider it TDS to expect Trump officials to abide by congressional subpoenas because you think the past 3 presidential administrations have avoided accountability. Yet you can’t point to previous instances of administration officials wholesale refusal to testify when subpoenaed...maybe I should have just gone with calling your argument retarded like the previous poster...PurpleThrobber said:
But but....in reverse.GDS said:Wh
Were there Obama officials that refused congressional subpoena?PurpleThrobber said:
jesus.TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
Did you miss the last 20 years of executive orders and various other bullshit?
and NOW you want accountability?
TDS, indeed, fren.
Nice work. -
We are talking about the release of records and compelling testimony not the specific program. If you want to argue about the practice of gunwalking start a thread. BTW - guns don't kill people, people do...Sledog said:
The rule of law did not win out. A scheme committed specifically to blame American gun owners for the problem it created in an attempt to sway public opinion so more gun control could be enacted. People died from those guns including Brain Terry a US Border Patrol agent.GDS said:
The administration claimed executive privilege. The case eventually went to court and the administration had to turn over most of the records. I agree with you that was a case of stonewalling and it took time but eventually the rule of law won out.RaceBannon said:GDS said:
So you consider it TDS to expect Trump officials to abide by congressional subpoenas because you think the past 3 presidential administrations have avoided accountability. Yet you can’t point to previous instances of administration officials wholesale refusal to testify when subpoenaed...maybe I should have just gone with calling your argument retarded like the previous poster...PurpleThrobber said:
But but....in reverse.GDS said:Wh
Were there Obama officials that refused congressional subpoena?PurpleThrobber said:
jesus.TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
Did you miss the last 20 years of executive orders and various other bullshit?
and NOW you want accountability?
TDS, indeed, fren.
Nice work. -
Both extremes are bad.TheKobeStopper said:
So, your argument is basically because Bush committed war crimes, Trump can do whatever he wants.PurpleThrobber said:
You don't understan maff? 20 years goes way past Obama.TheKobeStopper said:
Take your retard argument to someone that actually supported Obama.PurpleThrobber said:
jesus.TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
Did you miss the last 20 years of executive orders and various other bullshit?
and NOW you want accountability?
TDS, indeed, fren.
If you want to be an anarchist, cool. Stop hiding like a coward behind faux centrist both sides are so bad edgy bullshit.
-
Drug cartels do. That's who the guns went to. Rocket science much?GDS said:
We are talking about the release of records and compelling testimony not the specific program. If you want to argue about the practice of gunwalking start a thread. BTW - guns don't kill people, people do...Sledog said:
The rule of law did not win out. A scheme committed specifically to blame American gun owners for the problem it created in an attempt to sway public opinion so more gun control could be enacted. People died from those guns including Brain Terry a US Border Patrol agent.GDS said:
The administration claimed executive privilege. The case eventually went to court and the administration had to turn over most of the records. I agree with you that was a case of stonewalling and it took time but eventually the rule of law won out.RaceBannon said:GDS said:
So you consider it TDS to expect Trump officials to abide by congressional subpoenas because you think the past 3 presidential administrations have avoided accountability. Yet you can’t point to previous instances of administration officials wholesale refusal to testify when subpoenaed...maybe I should have just gone with calling your argument retarded like the previous poster...PurpleThrobber said:
But but....in reverse.GDS said:Wh
Were there Obama officials that refused congressional subpoena?PurpleThrobber said:
jesus.TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
Did you miss the last 20 years of executive orders and various other bullshit?
and NOW you want accountability?
TDS, indeed, fren.
Nice work. -
How fucking dumb can you be? Also noticed genius sledog voted this post up. Hillary had way more votes than Bernie. I'm not sure you call that stealing. However, if you still think that's stealing the nomination, I'm curious your thoughts on the electoral college as it relates to Trump's election.TurdBomber said:
A bigger threat than, say, surreptitiously stealing the Democratic Nomination from Bernie Sanders in 2016?TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable. -
One is a question of constitutional law. The other is outright corruption and election fraud.TheKobeStopper said:
Yes, the sitting president pushing for power that cannot be checked is more dangerous than the DNC pushing debates to Friday nights to keep viewership down.TurdBomber said:
A bigger threat than, say, surreptitiously stealing the Democratic Nomination from Bernie Sanders in 2016?TheKobeStopper said:They should absolutely be discussing it. I don’t think they have the power to do it but they should be making sure they don’t.
Trump is abandoning rule of law and the checks and balances that this country was built on. It’s dangerous and a threat to our democracy. Congress must explore all options to hold him accountable.
Not surprised that corruption and election fraud are of lesser importance to you.
