Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Cia-whistleblower-who-traveled-w/Biden-to-ukraine-doesnt-want-to-testify-Will submit written answers

2

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,353
    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    Great rant. Sounds like you’ve stopped impeachment now.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,441 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    Great rant. Sounds like you’ve stopped impeachment now.

  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,246 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    Sounds like hearsay.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,353
    Dude61 said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    Sounds like hearsay.
    No fucking shit. Lawyers and cops ask for hearsay all the time in investigations. Hearsay identifies those witnesses whose testimony isn't hearsay. Seriously, are you girls playing dumb or are you not playing?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,067 Standard Supporter
    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,353
    edited October 2019
    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,067 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,353
    edited October 2019
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    You have my answer. You don't have a right to like it.
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    For anyone that had Sled doesn't know the meaning of the word victim come on up to the window to claim your winnings!
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,067 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    You have my answer. You don't have a right to like it.
    So you've never done any criminal trail work? I rule you're evading the question. Why?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,353
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    You have my answer. You don't have a right to like it.
    So you've never done any criminal trail work? I rule you're evading the question. Why?
    NOC
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,962
    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    Sounds like hearsay.
    No fucking shit. Lawyers and cops ask for hearsay all the time in investigations. Hearsay identifies those witnesses whose testimony isn't hearsay. Seriously, are you girls playing dumb or are you not playing?
    You sound angry. Guessing daddy issues?

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,353

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    Sounds like hearsay.
    No fucking shit. Lawyers and cops ask for hearsay all the time in investigations. Hearsay identifies those witnesses whose testimony isn't hearsay. Seriously, are you girls playing dumb or are you not playing?
    You sound angry. Guessing daddy issues?

    Sorry. Triggered by morons shouting "Hearsay!"
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Ha ha ha.......Amazing how coordinated this all seems right? The WB with third hand information, who worked and supported Biden, now wants to write answers on paper so there is no chance of him/her being seen. He makes that demand at the same exact time it is revealed that he is Biden's buddy. Hmm.

    This is like a Kangaroo court happening here. A complete joke. Rats are so desperate that they are now going to try and impeach off of the third hand testimony of a Biden acquaintance/supporter who refuses to be cross examined and now is going to ghost some answers put to him by only the Rats.

    This is like an episode of the Twilight Zone. The liberals are all wearing pig noses. This isn't some shit hole country legal system, this is the USA and you dumbass libs are completely off the rails.

    Agree with this post for the most part. You still need a lesson in your use of vocabulary though. Which definition best describes the modern left? Are they "libs?"



    Or does 'fascist' better suit them?



    Would you call a Nazi a lib?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,441 Founders Club

    Ha ha ha.......Amazing how coordinated this all seems right? The WB with third hand information, who worked and supported Biden, now wants to write answers on paper so there is no chance of him/her being seen. He makes that demand at the same exact time it is revealed that he is Biden's buddy. Hmm.

    This is like a Kangaroo court happening here. A complete joke. Rats are so desperate that they are now going to try and impeach off of the third hand testimony of a Biden acquaintance/supporter who refuses to be cross examined and now is going to ghost some answers put to him by only the Rats.

    This is like an episode of the Twilight Zone. The liberals are all wearing pig noses. This isn't some shit hole country legal system, this is the USA and you dumbass libs are completely off the rails.

    Agree with this post for the most part. You still need a lesson in your use of vocabulary though. Which definition best describes the modern left? Are they "libs?"



    Or does 'fascist' better suit them?



    Would you call a Nazi a lib?
    Trumptard obviously
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,067 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    You have my answer. You don't have a right to like it.
    So you've never done any criminal trail work? I rule you're evading the question. Why?
    NOC
    I care. Just wondering why you won't say "The case would be dropped". But you know why.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,067 Standard Supporter
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,862 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    The TugCons are getting shrill and hysterical.

    This is fun!

    Fraudulently taking away someone's vote is fun huh? Ignoring the corruption in your own party must be fun for you too.

    You aren't much of an intellectual are you hh. Keep on goose stepping.

    Exactly what corruption in the Democrat party are you talking about?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wj-wNuKmBrY
Sign In or Register to comment.