Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Cia-whistleblower-who-traveled-w/Biden-to-ukraine-doesnt-want-to-testify-Will submit written answers

2»

Comments

  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    For anyone that had Sled doesn't know the meaning of the word victim come on up to the window to claim your winnings!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,831 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    You have my answer. You don't have a right to like it.
    So you've never done any criminal trail work? I rule you're evading the question. Why?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    You have my answer. You don't have a right to like it.
    So you've never done any criminal trail work? I rule you're evading the question. Why?
    NOC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    Sounds like hearsay.
    No fucking shit. Lawyers and cops ask for hearsay all the time in investigations. Hearsay identifies those witnesses whose testimony isn't hearsay. Seriously, are you girls playing dumb or are you not playing?
    You sound angry. Guessing daddy issues?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    HoustonHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    Sounds like hearsay.
    No fucking shit. Lawyers and cops ask for hearsay all the time in investigations. Hearsay identifies those witnesses whose testimony isn't hearsay. Seriously, are you girls playing dumb or are you not playing?
    You sound angry. Guessing daddy issues?

    Sorry. Triggered by morons shouting "Hearsay!"
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Bendintheriver said:

    Ha ha ha.......Amazing how coordinated this all seems right? The WB with third hand information, who worked and supported Biden, now wants to write answers on paper so there is no chance of him/her being seen. He makes that demand at the same exact time it is revealed that he is Biden's buddy. Hmm.

    This is like a Kangaroo court happening here. A complete joke. Rats are so desperate that they are now going to try and impeach off of the third hand testimony of a Biden acquaintance/supporter who refuses to be cross examined and now is going to ghost some answers put to him by only the Rats.

    This is like an episode of the Twilight Zone. The liberals are all wearing pig noses. This isn't some shit hole country legal system, this is the USA and you dumbass libs are completely off the rails.

    Agree with this post for the most part. You still need a lesson in your use of vocabulary though. Which definition best describes the modern left? Are they "libs?"



    Or does 'fascist' better suit them?



    Would you call a Nazi a lib?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,091 Founders Club
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    Ha ha ha.......Amazing how coordinated this all seems right? The WB with third hand information, who worked and supported Biden, now wants to write answers on paper so there is no chance of him/her being seen. He makes that demand at the same exact time it is revealed that he is Biden's buddy. Hmm.

    This is like a Kangaroo court happening here. A complete joke. Rats are so desperate that they are now going to try and impeach off of the third hand testimony of a Biden acquaintance/supporter who refuses to be cross examined and now is going to ghost some answers put to him by only the Rats.

    This is like an episode of the Twilight Zone. The liberals are all wearing pig noses. This isn't some shit hole country legal system, this is the USA and you dumbass libs are completely off the rails.

    Agree with this post for the most part. You still need a lesson in your use of vocabulary though. Which definition best describes the modern left? Are they "libs?"



    Or does 'fascist' better suit them?



    Would you call a Nazi a lib?
    Trumptard obviously
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,831 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Yeah the supposed victims testimony doesn't matter. You never answered that question.

    Actually I did. You're retarded.
    No you didn't. You rambled with all kinds of BS but didn't answer the question.

    "It was nothing and one shouldn't be impeached for nothing. The "victim" said it didn't happen. How does that work out in a criminal trail? Let us know when you find out."

    So how does that work in a criminal trial?

    You have my answer. You don't have a right to like it.
    So you've never done any criminal trail work? I rule you're evading the question. Why?
    NOC
    I care. Just wondering why you won't say "The case would be dropped". But you know why.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,831 Standard Supporter
    https://hannity.com/media-room/report-rep-adam-schiff-has-two-staffers-who-worked-with-whistleblower-at-the-white-house/

    Gosh two staffers that worked with the whistleblower? Nothing to see move along......
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    The TugCons are getting shrill and hysterical.

    This is fun!

    Fraudulently taking away someone's vote is fun huh? Ignoring the corruption in your own party must be fun for you too.

    You aren't much of an intellectual are you hh. Keep on goose stepping.

    Exactly what corruption in the Democrat party are you talking about?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wj-wNuKmBrY
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Adam Schiff wants to impeach Trump using an unnamed CIA spy he lied about helping, who will testify in secret about a phone call they didn’t actually hear and a transcript we already read—that notes Trump’s desire to fight political corruption.

    Jussie Smollet had a better hoax.

    You Trumptards are awful slow.

    The whistleblower is a witness to who the direct witnesses are and what they said to him. But it's not his testimony that going to hang Daddy, because he wasn't there.

    Btw, Daddy has already confirmed the whistleblower's account.
    The assistant to the assistant manager?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,831 Standard Supporter
    Lather rinse repeat is the dems mantra. If they can keep deflecting from the enormous pay to play Clinton was running and all the other illegal actions they'll keep doing it. Clinton foundation was the distribution point for all the Obama admin payoffs. Odd Hillary and Bill were worried they'd starve they were so broke and now they're gazzillionaires again. Coincidence?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    Sledog said:

    Clinton foundation was the distribution point for all the Obama admin payoffs.

    #AlexJonesNostalgiaTour2019
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,831 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Clinton foundation was the distribution point for all the Obama admin payoffs.

    #AlexJonesNostalgiaTour2019
    Forgot to include the massive Trump spying mess. Really all part of the same criminal activity authorized by ObaMao.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Rubberfist
    Rubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Clinton foundation was the distribution point for all the Obama admin payoffs.

    #AlexJonesNostalgiaTour2019
    Forgot to include the massive Trump spying mess. Really all part of the same criminal activity authorized by ObaMao.
    If Sled has grandkids who cared about him they’d take his computer away.

    Some Boomers can’t handle the internet.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,831 Standard Supporter
    Rubberfist said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Clinton foundation was the distribution point for all the Obama admin payoffs.

    #AlexJonesNostalgiaTour2019
    Forgot to include the massive Trump spying mess. Really all part of the same criminal activity authorized by ObaMao.
    If Sled has grandkids who cared about him they’d take his computer away.

    Some Boomers can’t handle the internet.
    Already proven true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Lather rinse repeat is the dems mantra. If they can keep deflecting from the enormous pay to play Clinton was running and all the other illegal actions they'll keep doing it. Clinton foundation was the distribution point for all the Obama admin payoffs. Odd Hillary and Bill were worried they'd starve they were so broke and now they're gazzillionaires again. Coincidence?

    Can you be any more stupid? I think memes are more your speed but I'll give you a crack at a news article.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2016/11/08/how-bill-house-hillary-clinton-made-240-million-how-much-earnings-rich-white/
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter