Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«13

Comments

  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary
    Most transparent ever.
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,302
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    I'll wait for the evidence at the impeachment trial to make up my mind
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
  • Options
    TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary
    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
  • Options
    ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    Republicans complain nobody being very nice to witnesses.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
    The transcript.
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    Did you figure out what the emoluments clause entails? Or that Pizzagate was a hoax?
  • Options
    TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
    The transcript.
    It’s not a transcript of the phone call.
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
    The transcript.
    When Gay Bob knows he's on the losing side of an argument he focuses on semantics and technicalities to deflect. What a little bitch.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    Did you figure out what the emoluments clause entails? Or that Pizzagate was a hoax?
    The emoluments clause applied to Ivanka in 2012? Got a link dumbfuck?
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    Did you figure out what the emoluments clause entails? Or that Pizzagate was a hoax?
    The emoluments clause applied to Ivanka in 2012? Got a link dumbfuck?
    Trump and his kids are making tens of millions in 2019 off his presidency. Fuck off with that 2012 bullshit.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
    The transcript.
    It’s not a transcript of the phone call.
    We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
    The transcript.
    It’s not a transcript of the phone call.
    We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.
    Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
    The transcript.
    It’s not a transcript of the phone call.
    We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.
    Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.
    Keep on dodging the question like the fucking Kunt you are.
  • Options
    TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
    The transcript.
    It’s not a transcript of the phone call.
    We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.
    Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.
    Sadly, they’ll eventually get to take the uniform off.



  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,302
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
    The transcript.
    It’s not a transcript of the phone call.
    We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.
    Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.
    Sadly, they’ll eventually get to take the uniform off.



    John Brennan

    I was just following orders
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    *a summary of notes from the transcript
    The transcript.
    It’s not a transcript of the phone call.
    We're told that the evidence of Trump's quid pro quo is readily event in the transcript that was released. O'Keefed is busy right now telling anyone who will listen that Trump incriminates himself in the transcript that was released. You Kunts need to get your stories straight.
    Keep on carrying water for the pathological lying con man that you claim you didn't vote for. Can't wait to see you deny you ever supported him once he's removed from office next year.
    Sadly, they’ll eventually get to take the uniform off.



    I didnt' think you and your pals were ever out of uniform APAG.


  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    But it was a beautiful and perfect phone call. Why would he try to hide what was discussed?

    They haven't that's why the released the transcript. Have you been able to figure out yet how Ivanka making money in 2012 isn't like Hunter Biden making money in 2014?
    Did you figure out what the emoluments clause entails? Or that Pizzagate was a hoax?
    The emoluments clause applied to Ivanka in 2012? Got a link dumbfuck?
    Trump and his kids are making tens of millions in 2019 off his presidency. Fuck off with that 2012 bullshit.
    Explains why you posted a tweet from 2012. Are you admitting you're a dipshit who didn't look at the date of the tweet you posted?
Sign In or Register to comment.