Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

REPORT: Dems Consider Hiding ID of WB From GOP Lawmkers by Holding Testimony in Remote location &...

DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
edited October 2019 in Tug Tavern
....changing his appearance and voice!

“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.

The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/

So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
«1

Comments

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,850 Standard Supporter
    “Feared for his life”?!?

    Barbara Hedges is the whistleblower.

  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,188 Standard Supporter
    They are so pathetically dishonest. THey know their idiotic goose steppers on here are dumb enough to swallow this shit, but the rest of the country sees this scam for what it is.

    Again, just pathetically obvious.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    DJDuck said:

    ....changing his appearance and voice!

    “The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.

    The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/

    So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.

    What is he accusing the GOP of exactly?
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,188 Standard Supporter
    So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.

    Exactly. We are supposed to believe a bunch of lying and biased democrats on what they hear from this mystery person? Are you kidding me? No one but a lying lib gets to interview the 3rd hand knowledge democrat donor WB?

    This is ridiculous on so many levels. Only Rats could dream up this shit and try to pass it off as legit.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.

    Exactly. We are supposed to believe a bunch of lying and biased democrats on what they hear from this mystery person? Are you kidding me? No one but a lying lib gets to interview the 3rd hand knowledge democrat donor WB?

    This is ridiculous on so many levels. Only Rats could dream up this shit and try to pass it off as legit.

    Ok same question to you. What exactly is he accusing the GOP of?
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    The whistleblower law specifically provides the complainant anonymity.
    The IC IG deemed the complaint credible. That’s why Congress is pursuing the issue.

    There’s nothing you trumptards can do about this but bitch and whine, which you do daily. You don’t have a clue about what’s happening.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    DJDuck said:

    ....changing his appearance and voice!

    “The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.

    The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/

    So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.

    We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    ....changing his appearance and voice!

    “The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.

    The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/

    So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.

    We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.
    Study this for a minute
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,091
    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    ....changing his appearance and voice!

    “The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.

    The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/

    So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.

    We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.
    He released a transcript that confirmed you and you leftist pals were lying. Undettered, you and your fellow libs did what you always do, continue to lie in the hope that the usual suspect will continue to repeat the lies.

    Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.

    Police canceled the game.

    It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club
    H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626

    H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower

    Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    edited October 2019
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    ....changing his appearance and voice!

    “The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.

    The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/

    So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.

    We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.
    He released a transcript that confirmed you and you leftist pals were lying. Undettered, you and your fellow libs did what you always do, continue to lie in the hope that the usual suspect will continue to repeat the lies.

    Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.

    Police canceled the game.

    It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy.

    Interesting. blob accusing someone who disagrees with him of lying. What were the odds of that?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,091
    HHusky said:

    H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower

    Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.
    Could you get together with some of your fellow Hondo Bros and get it straight on if we're calling what was released by the WH a "transcript" or not. It seems to trigger some of them when it's referred to as a transcript.

    Maybe when they see a kneepadding bitch in good standing like yourself calls it's a "transcript" its not a big deal.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower

    Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.
    Could you get together with some of your fellow Hondo Bros and get it straight on if we're calling what was released by the WH a "transcript" or not. It seems to trigger some of them when it's referred to as a transcript.

    Maybe when they see a kneepadding bitch in good standing like yourself calls it's a "transcript" its not a big deal.

    It’s a summary at least. Admissions by Daddy. Whistleblower complaint was confirmed. And yes, if there was a 30 minute phone call it is incomplete.
  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,578
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower

    Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.
    It’s a summary at least. Admissions by Daddy. Whistleblower complaint was confirmed. And yes, if there was a 30 minute phone call it is incomplete.
    Even tho I realize you have Daddy issues, I read your post and laughed out loud. I know, it's not good to laugh at the mentally deranged.

    Just what did Trump admit? In the transcript there are 540 words between the discussion of US aid and Trump inquiring about Ukranian corruption. That's not how you tie two things together. Only ignorance and hackery would you to reason that way.

    Yes, it is a transcript. If you weren't such a partsian dunce you would know that there was an interpreter used. That's why it takes 8-10 minutes to read a 30 minute conversation.
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,995
    edited October 2019
    So now a rumor-mongerer that has literally zero 1st hand knowledge of anything is somehow a "whistle-blower", the transcript that proves it is a sack of lies is no longer a transcript, the rumor-mongerer is impartial even though he/she just happens to be in bed with a current Dem 2020 candidate, and this moron who is anonymous is somehow also is worried because he/she is getting "death threats".

    Although the last one may be true...from Hunter and Joe Biden...cause it finished off his already dead campaign...

    And the ICIG didn't investigate anything...Congress is only investigating because the fraud went to Schiff first to get his attorneys to write it up. Congress should not have even heard about it because the DNI and DOJ investigated it and determined it was not credible.

    And HondoBros wonder why we laugh at their stupidity...
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Trump is getting impeached. Keep melting down though.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    Blu82 said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower

    Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.
    It’s a summary at least. Admissions by Daddy. Whistleblower complaint was confirmed. And yes, if there was a 30 minute phone call it is incomplete.
    Even tho I realize you have Daddy issues, I read your post and laughed out loud. I know, it's not good to laugh at the mentally deranged.

    Just what did Trump admit? In the transcript there are 540 words between the discussion of US aid and Trump inquiring about Ukranian corruption. That's not how you tie two things together. Only ignorance and hackery would you to reason that way.

    Yes, it is a transcript. If you weren't such a partsian dunce you would know that there was an interpreter used. That's why it takes 8-10 minutes to read a 30 minute conversation.
    Doesn’t make much difference whether it’s complete. Daddy did what he was accused of and so the whistleblower’s sources were correct. Then Daddy solicited foreign interference to benefit his campaign on the teevee, cuz of course he did.

    But as I said last week, if Daddy wrote out and signed a confession, some of you cocksuckers would still defend him because it wasn’t written in blood.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,091
    HHusky said:

    Blu82 said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower

    Take the meds. They don’t do any good sitting on top of your dresser.
    It’s a summary at least. Admissions by Daddy. Whistleblower complaint was confirmed. And yes, if there was a 30 minute phone call it is incomplete.
    Even tho I realize you have Daddy issues, I read your post and laughed out loud. I know, it's not good to laugh at the mentally deranged.

    Just what did Trump admit? In the transcript there are 540 words between the discussion of US aid and Trump inquiring about Ukranian corruption. That's not how you tie two things together. Only ignorance and hackery would you to reason that way.

    Yes, it is a transcript. If you weren't such a partsian dunce you would know that there was an interpreter used. That's why it takes 8-10 minutes to read a 30 minute conversation.
    Doesn’t make much difference whether it’s complete. Daddy did what he was accused of and so the whistleblower’s sources were correct. Then Daddy solicited foreign interference to benefit his campaign on the teevee, cuz of course he did.

    But as I said last week, if Daddy wrote out and signed a confession, some of you cocksuckers would still defend him because it wasn’t written in blood.
    One thing you know for certain is that O'Keefed, never lies and you can take anything he says to the bank.

    Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.

    Police canceled the game.

    It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626

    Or you could just read the fucking transcript, blob. It’s not that long.
Sign In or Register to comment.