REPORT: Dems Consider Hiding ID of WB From GOP Lawmkers by Holding Testimony in Remote location &...
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
Comments
-
“Feared for his life”?!?
Barbara Hedges is the whistleblower.
-
They are so pathetically dishonest. THey know their idiotic goose steppers on here are dumb enough to swallow this shit, but the rest of the country sees this scam for what it is.
Again, just pathetically obvious. -
What is he accusing the GOP of exactly?DJDuck said:....changing his appearance and voice!
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one. -
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
Exactly. We are supposed to believe a bunch of lying and biased democrats on what they hear from this mystery person? Are you kidding me? No one but a lying lib gets to interview the 3rd hand knowledge democrat donor WB?
This is ridiculous on so many levels. Only Rats could dream up this shit and try to pass it off as legit. -
Ok same question to you. What exactly is he accusing the GOP of?Bendintheriver said:So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
Exactly. We are supposed to believe a bunch of lying and biased democrats on what they hear from this mystery person? Are you kidding me? No one but a lying lib gets to interview the 3rd hand knowledge democrat donor WB?
This is ridiculous on so many levels. Only Rats could dream up this shit and try to pass it off as legit. -
The whistleblower law specifically provides the complainant anonymity.
The IC IG deemed the complaint credible. That’s why Congress is pursuing the issue.
There’s nothing you trumptards can do about this but bitch and whine, which you do daily. You don’t have a clue about what’s happening. -
We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.DJDuck said:....changing his appearance and voice!
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one. -
Study this for a minuteHHusky said:
We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.DJDuck said:....changing his appearance and voice!
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one. -
He released a transcript that confirmed you and you leftist pals were lying. Undettered, you and your fellow libs did what you always do, continue to lie in the hope that the usual suspect will continue to repeat the lies.HHusky said:
We have the right to face our accusers in proceedings against us, not during an investigation or police questioning. Anyway, Daddy released the transcript that confirmed the story and the whistleblower is not a witness to the events in question and so wouldn’t likely be one of Daddy’s accusers at trial.DJDuck said:....changing his appearance and voice!
“The Washington Post reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the discussions, that Democrats are going to go to great lengths to conceal the ‘whistleblower’s’ identity by holding his testimony in a remote location and even changing his physical appearance and voice.
The Democrats also want to bar GOP lawmakers from questioning the whistleblower and only allow staffers to question him outside of the Capitol.“
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/report-dems-consider-hiding-identity-of-whistleblower-from-gop-lawmakers-by-holding-testimony-in-remote-location-changing-his-appearance-voice/
So much for being able to face your accuser. Hell this could be anyone or no one.
Can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want a memorial to become a Daddy Campaign Event? That’s a you issue.
Police canceled the game.
It’s pretty deplorable to politicize a family’s tragedy.
-
H also admitted the whistleblower isn't a whistleblower
