If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.
If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote
What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
You don’t think they’re coming?
Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.
Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.
If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote
What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
You don’t think they’re coming?
Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.
Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
So where are the Articles? What the fuck is the delay? This is SERIOUS
Every other Impeachment began with a full House vote. Is it Law? No. Is it revealing that Pelosi won't do it? Yes
Do something other than bang you gums together spouting bullshit
If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.
If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote
What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
You don’t think they’re coming?
Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.
Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
So where are the Articles? What the fuck is the delay? This is SERIOUS
Every other Impeachment began with a full House vote. Is it Law? No. Is it revealing that Pelosi won't do it? Yes
Do something other than bang you gums together spouting bullshit
TIA
Every other impeachment began with a full house vote? Lou Dobbs tell you that?
If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.
If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote
What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
You don’t think they’re coming?
Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.
Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
So where are the Articles? What the fuck is the delay? This is SERIOUS
Every other Impeachment began with a full House vote. Is it Law? No. Is it revealing that Pelosi won't do it? Yes
Do something other than bang you gums together spouting bullshit
TIA
Every other impeachment began with a full house vote? Lou Dobbs tell you that?
Might want to reconsider before the 15 minute edit window shuts
If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.
If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote
What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
You don’t think they’re coming?
Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.
Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
So where are the Articles? What the fuck is the delay? This is SERIOUS
Every other Impeachment began with a full House vote. Is it Law? No. Is it revealing that Pelosi won't do it? Yes
Do something other than bang you gums together spouting bullshit
TIA
Every other impeachment began with a full house vote? Lou Dobbs tell you that?
Might want to reconsider before the 15 minute edit window shuts
Every other impeachment began with a full house vote? Lou Dobbs tell you that?
Pay attention - I did say that but I was wrong. Only the Nixon and Clinton ones. Not Johnson. At any rate when do we start the hearings.
I said it wasn't law and it isn't. It is precedent since 40 plus years ago.
This has been the subject of much dispute. The House voted to open an inquiry into Nixon and Clinton, but when the House impeached President Andrew Johnson in 1868, it did not.
Pelosi has indicated she doesn’t see such a vote as being necessary. Republicans meanwhile are using the lack of a vote to argue the inquiry isn’t legitimate.
Just because the House voted to open an inquiry in the past doesn’t mean it must always do so, Brookings Fellow Margaret L. Taylor said.
Pay attention - I did say that but I was wrong. Only the Nixon and Clinton ones. Not Johnson. At any rate when do we start the hearings.
I said it wasn't law and it isn't. It is precedent since 40 plus years ago.
This has been the subject of much dispute. The House voted to open an inquiry into Nixon and Clinton, but when the House impeached President Andrew Johnson in 1868, it did not.
Pelosi has indicated she doesn’t see such a vote as being necessary. Republicans meanwhile are using the lack of a vote to argue the inquiry isn’t legitimate.
Just because the House voted to open an inquiry in the past doesn’t mean it must always do so, Brookings Fellow Margaret L. Taylor said.
Same with the president releasing their tax returns.
Pay attention - I did say that but I was wrong. Only the Nixon and Clinton ones. Not Johnson. At any rate when do we start the hearings.
I said it wasn't law and it isn't. It is precedent since 40 plus years ago.
This has been the subject of much dispute. The House voted to open an inquiry into Nixon and Clinton, but when the House impeached President Andrew Johnson in 1868, it did not.
Pelosi has indicated she doesn’t see such a vote as being necessary. Republicans meanwhile are using the lack of a vote to argue the inquiry isn’t legitimate.
Just because the House voted to open an inquiry in the past doesn’t mean it must always do so, Brookings Fellow Margaret L. Taylor said.
Same with the president releasing their tax returns.
Comments
Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
Every other Impeachment began with a full House vote. Is it Law? No. Is it revealing that Pelosi won't do it? Yes
Do something other than bang you gums together spouting bullshit
TIA
I said it wasn't law and it isn't. It is precedent since 40 plus years ago.
This has been the subject of much dispute. The House voted to open an inquiry into Nixon and Clinton, but when the House impeached President Andrew Johnson in 1868, it did not.
Pelosi has indicated she doesn’t see such a vote as being necessary. Republicans meanwhile are using the lack of a vote to argue the inquiry isn’t legitimate.
Just because the House voted to open an inquiry in the past doesn’t mean it must always do so, Brookings Fellow Margaret L. Taylor said.