He endangered national security
Comments
-
Pointing out a lie by lying isn't an argument.Bendintheriver said:
I know hondo. Pointing out your lies and hypocrisy are so inconvenient aren't they?2001400ex said:Can Bob make an argument without pointing at Obama or Biden or Hillary? Again they all were under a republican Congress. And 2/3 were subject of more than one investigation by the house. Either you are fill of shit or the house is incompetent. I side with abundance.
What a fucking tool. -
The party being "extorted" denies even knowing about the "extortion", and other than the word of a proven pathological liar there no evidence of extortion in the transcript.HHusky said:
The party being extorted denies the extortion. Compelling!Bendintheriver said:
So, again, you have proof of this HH? The transcripts said zip and how dare you contradict the President of Ukraine!HHusky said:Using public resources to extort a foreign government into digging up (making up) dirt on your political opponent is impeachable. If you disagree, just say so.
You have to love the desperation in liberals. The President of a country says nothing happened yet they just keep on pushing.
Tough call. -
You're still right and a wonderful person.SFGbob said:
And that's the kind of quality analysis you're just not going to be able to get from just any run of the mill liberal. It takes a Tug leftist to provide you with that kind of insight.Gwad said:Ok whatever you're right were wrong. Go to sleep please.
-
Like I said. Trump could walk into Bob's house and rape his entire family and Bob would swallow a 1000 cocks to defend the President's actions.
-
You call me when my defense of Trump looks anything like the lies and bullshit and cock sucking you did in support of Obama for 8 years Owl.HustlinOwl said:Like I said. Trump could walk into Bob's house and rape his entire family and Bob would swallow a 1000 cocks to defend the President's actions.
I've never lied in order to defend Trump. You can't honestly say the same Owl. -
Investigating corrupt former elected officials - if you disagree just say so.HHusky said:Using public resources to extort a foreign government into digging up (making up) dirt on your political opponent is impeachable. If you disagree, just say so.
-
Fine.PurpleThrobber said:
Investigating corrupt former elected officials - if you disagree just say so.HHusky said:Using public resources to extort a foreign government into digging up (making up) dirt on your political opponent is impeachable. If you disagree, just say so.
Just stop asking the Russians and the Chinese to do it.
Not complicated. -
Whew. Good thing the Biden corruption is with Ukraine.ThomasFremont said:
Fine.PurpleThrobber said:
Investigating corrupt former elected officials - if you disagree just say so.HHusky said:Using public resources to extort a foreign government into digging up (making up) dirt on your political opponent is impeachable. If you disagree, just say so.
Just stop asking the Russians and the Chinese to do it.
Not complicated.
OK!
-
Then why is the president asking China to investigate a political opponent?PurpleThrobber said:
Whew. Good thing the Biden corruption is with Ukraine.ThomasFremont said:
Fine.PurpleThrobber said:
Investigating corrupt former elected officials - if you disagree just say so.HHusky said:Using public resources to extort a foreign government into digging up (making up) dirt on your political opponent is impeachable. If you disagree, just say so.
Just stop asking the Russians and the Chinese to do it.
Not complicated.
OK! -
But asking the Russians and the Ukrainians to dig up political dirt on your opponents is cool.ThomasFremont said:
Fine.PurpleThrobber said:
Investigating corrupt former elected officials - if you disagree just say so.HHusky said:Using public resources to extort a foreign government into digging up (making up) dirt on your political opponent is impeachable. If you disagree, just say so.
Just stop asking the Russians and the Chinese to do it.
Not complicated.
