Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

He endangered national security

2»

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RaceBannon said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    Using public resources to extort a foreign government into digging up (making up) dirt on your political opponent is impeachable. If you disagree, just say so.

    Investigating corrupt former elected officials - if you disagree just say so.
    Fine.

    Just stop asking the Russians and the Chinese to do it.

    Not complicated.
    It was in 2016 when Hillary asked the Ukraine

    So is it wrong or not? Sounds like you only think so if Hillary did it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    ThomasFremont said:

    RaceBannon said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    Using public resources to extort a foreign government into digging up (making up) dirt on your political opponent is impeachable. If you disagree, just say so.

    Investigating corrupt former elected officials - if you disagree just say so.
    Fine.

    Just stop asking the Russians and the Chinese to do it.

    Not complicated.
    It was in 2016 when Hillary asked the Ukraine

    So is it wrong or not? Sounds like you only think so if Hillary did it.
    Sure
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    The Ukraine says Hillary did it and Trump didn't

    Hope this helps
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
    Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote

    What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
    Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote

    What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
    You don’t think they’re coming?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
    Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote

    What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
    You don’t think they’re coming?
    Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
    Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote

    What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
    You don’t think they’re coming?
    Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
    A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.

    Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
    Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote

    What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
    You don’t think they’re coming?
    Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
    A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.

    Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
    So where are the Articles? What the fuck is the delay? This is SERIOUS

    Every other Impeachment began with a full House vote. Is it Law? No. Is it revealing that Pelosi won't do it? Yes

    Do something other than bang you gums together spouting bullshit

    TIA
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
    Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote

    What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
    You don’t think they’re coming?
    Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
    A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.

    Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
    So where are the Articles? What the fuck is the delay? This is SERIOUS

    Every other Impeachment began with a full House vote. Is it Law? No. Is it revealing that Pelosi won't do it? Yes

    Do something other than bang you gums together spouting bullshit

    TIA
    Every other impeachment began with a full house vote? Lou Dobbs tell you that?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
    Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote

    What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
    You don’t think they’re coming?
    Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
    A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.

    Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
    So where are the Articles? What the fuck is the delay? This is SERIOUS

    Every other Impeachment began with a full House vote. Is it Law? No. Is it revealing that Pelosi won't do it? Yes

    Do something other than bang you gums together spouting bullshit

    TIA
    Every other impeachment began with a full house vote? Lou Dobbs tell you that?
    Might want to reconsider before the 15 minute edit window shuts
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    If ever you want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become a political opponent of the President and then no one can investigate you.

    If you ever want complete immunity from unethical and or criminal activity just become President and then no one can indict you.
    So Nadler can't do whatever he wants?
    He can impeach. And then the Manhattan DA can indict. Does that work for you?
    Well lets get those articles of impeachment out and call for a vote

    What the fuck are you waiting for? This is SERIOUS
    You don’t think they’re coming?
    Gosh I hope so. All I hear now is hot air. When is the full House vote to get this started? Why do we have to wait? Trump is guilty, lets roll
    A House vote is required for an impeachment inquiry? I’m sure you can cite that and are not regurgitating trump trash bullshit.

    Here’s your Destiny: it’s rolling baby, it’s rolling!
    So where are the Articles? What the fuck is the delay? This is SERIOUS

    Every other Impeachment began with a full House vote. Is it Law? No. Is it revealing that Pelosi won't do it? Yes

    Do something other than bang you gums together spouting bullshit

    TIA
    Every other impeachment began with a full house vote? Lou Dobbs tell you that?
    Might want to reconsider before the 15 minute edit window shuts
    Every other impeachment began with a full house vote? Lou Dobbs tell you that?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    edited October 2019
    Pay attention - I did say that but I was wrong. Only the Nixon and Clinton ones. Not Johnson. At any rate when do we start the hearings.

    I said it wasn't law and it isn't. It is precedent since 40 plus years ago.

    This has been the subject of much dispute. The House voted to open an inquiry into Nixon and Clinton, but when the House impeached President Andrew Johnson in 1868, it did not.

    Pelosi has indicated she doesn’t see such a vote as being necessary. Republicans meanwhile are using the lack of a vote to argue the inquiry isn’t legitimate.

    Just because the House voted to open an inquiry in the past doesn’t mean it must always do so, Brookings Fellow Margaret L. Taylor said.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    Pay attention - I did say that but I was wrong. Only the Nixon and Clinton ones. Not Johnson. At any rate when do we start the hearings.

    I said it wasn't law and it isn't. It is precedent since 40 plus years ago.

    This has been the subject of much dispute. The House voted to open an inquiry into Nixon and Clinton, but when the House impeached President Andrew Johnson in 1868, it did not.

    Pelosi has indicated she doesn’t see such a vote as being necessary. Republicans meanwhile are using the lack of a vote to argue the inquiry isn’t legitimate.

    Just because the House voted to open an inquiry in the past doesn’t mean it must always do so, Brookings Fellow Margaret L. Taylor said.

    Same with the president releasing their tax returns.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Pay attention - I did say that but I was wrong. Only the Nixon and Clinton ones. Not Johnson. At any rate when do we start the hearings.

    I said it wasn't law and it isn't. It is precedent since 40 plus years ago.

    This has been the subject of much dispute. The House voted to open an inquiry into Nixon and Clinton, but when the House impeached President Andrew Johnson in 1868, it did not.

    Pelosi has indicated she doesn’t see such a vote as being necessary. Republicans meanwhile are using the lack of a vote to argue the inquiry isn’t legitimate.

    Just because the House voted to open an inquiry in the past doesn’t mean it must always do so, Brookings Fellow Margaret L. Taylor said.

    Same with the president releasing their tax returns.
    Gee thanks for nothing as usual
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter